New sonographic breast technologies

Seminars in Roentgenology

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 292-301

  Hashimoto, Beverly E ^a  

^a VIRGINIA MASON MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOMATED WHOLE BREAST SONOGRAPHY; B SCAN; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST FIBROADENOMA; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; ELASTOGRAPHY; FUSION IMAGING; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

BREAST DISEASES; BREAST NEOPLASMS; ELASTICITY IMAGING TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 82455219187     PISSN: 0037198X     EISSN: 15584658     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/j.ro.2011.08.001     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Souchon R., Bouchoux G., Maciejko E., et al. Monitoring the formation of thermal lesions with heat-induced echo-strain imaging: A feasibility study. Ultrasound Med Biol 2005, 31:251-259.
2. Souchon R., Rouvière O., Gelet A., et al. Visualisation of HIFU lesions using elastography of the human prostate in vivo: Preliminary results. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003, 29:1007-1015.
3. Bharat S., Techavipoo U., Kiss M.Z., et al. Monitoring stiffness changes in lesions after radiofrequency ablation at different temperatures and durations of ablation. Ultrasound Med Biol 2005, 31:415-422.
4. Lyshchik A., Higashi T., Asato R., et al. Thyroid gland tumor diagnosis at US elastography. Radiology 2005, 237:202-211.
5. Bae U., Dighe M., Dubinsky T., et al. Ultrasound thyroid elastography using carotid artery pulsation: Preliminary study. J Ultrasound Med 2007, 26:797-805.
6. Garra B.S. Imaging and estimation of tissue elasticity by ultrasound. Ultrasound Q 2007, 23:255-268.
7. Hall T.J. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: Topics in US beyond the basics: Elasticity imaging with US. Radiographics 2003, 23:1657-1671.
8. Ophir J., Céspedes I., Ponnekanti H., et al. Elastography: A quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrason Imaging 1991, 13:111-134.
9. Thitaikumar A., Mobbs L.M., Kraemer-Chant C.M., et al. Breast tumor classification using axial shear strain elastography: A feasibility study. Phys Med Biol 2008, 53:4809-4823.
10. Garra B.S., Cespedes E.I., Ophir J., et al. Elastography of breast lesions: Initial clinical results. Radiology 1997, 202:79-86.
11. Hiltawsky K.M., Krüger M., Starke C., et al. Freehand ultrasound elastography of breast lesions: Clinical results. Ultrasound Med Biol 2001, 27:1461-1469.
12. Hall T.J., Zhu Y., Spalding C.S. In vivo real-time freehand palpation imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003, 29:427-435.
13. Itoh A., Ueno E., Tohno E., et al. Breast disease: Clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology 2006, 239:341-350.
14. Sohn Y.M., Kim M.J., Kim E.K., et al. Sonographic elastography combined with conventional sonography: How much is it helpful for diagnostic performance?. J Ultrasound Med 2009, 28:413-420.
15. Scaperrotta G., Ferranti C., Costa C., et al. Role of sonoelastography in non-palpable breast lesions. Eur Radiol 2008, 18:2381-2389.
16. Zhi H., Ou B., Luo B.M., et al. Comparison of ultrasound elastography, mammography, and sonography in the diagnosis of solid breast lesions. J Ultrasound Med 2007, 26:807-815.
17. Thomas A., Fischer T., Frey H., et al. Real-time elastography-An advanced method of ultrasound: First results in 108 patients with breast lesions. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006, 28:335-340.
18. Cho N., Moon W.K., Park J.S., et al. Nonpalpable breast masses: Evaluation by US elastography. Korean J Radiol 2008, 9:111-118.
19. Tohno E., Ueno E. Current improvements in breast ultrasound, with a special focus on elastography. Breast Cancer 2008, 15:200-204.
20. Regner D.M., Hesley G.K., Hangiandreou N.J., et al. Breast lesions: Evaluation with US strain imaging-clinical experience of multiple observers. Radiology 2006, 238:425-437.
21. Burnside E.S., Hall T.J., Sommer A.M., et al. Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses with US strain imaging. Radiology 2007, 245:401-410.
22. Benacerraf B.R., Shipp T.D., Bromley B. How sonographic tomography will change the face of obstetric sonography: a pilot study. J Ultrasound Med 2005, 24:371-378.
23. Downey D.B., Fenster A., Williams J.C. Clinical utility of three-dimensional US. Radiographics 2000, 20:559-571.
24. Cho N., Moon W.K., Cha J.H., et al. Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses: Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional US. Radiology 2006, 240:26-32.
25. Fischer T., Filimonow S., Hamm B., et al. Dignitatsbeurteilung mammasonographischer herdemittels dreidimensionaler Darstellung [Characterization of sonographically detected breast lesions using three-dimensional data sets]. Rofo 2006, 178:1224-1234.
26. Choa K.R., Seo B.K., Lee J.Y., et al. A comparative study of 2D and 3D ultrasonography for evaluation of solid breast masses. Eur J Radiol 2005, 54. 365-337.
27. Rotten D., Levaillant J.M., Constancis E., et al. Three-dimensional imaging of solid breast tumors with ultrasound: Preliminary data and analysis of its possible contribution to the understanding of the standard two-dimensional sonographic images. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1991, 1:384-390.
28. Rotten D., Levaillant J.M., Zerat L. Analysis of normal breast tissue and of solid breast masses using three-dimensional ultrasound mammography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999, 14:114-124.
29. Watermann D.O., Földi M., Hanjalic-Beck A., et al. Three-dimensional ultrasound for the assessment of breast lesions. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005, 25:592-598.
30. Meyberg-Solomayer G.C., Kraemer B., Bergmann A., et al. Does 3-D sonography bring any advantage to noninvasive breast diagnostics?. Ultrasound Med Biol 2004, 30:583-589.
31. Weismann C.F., Datz L. Diagnostic algorithm: How to make use of new 2D, 3D and 4D ultrasound technologies in breast imaging. Eur J Radiol 2007, 64:250-257.
32. Carson P.L., Moskalik A.P., Govil A., et al. The 3D and 2D color flow display of breast masses. Ultrasound Med Biol 1997, 23:837-849.
33. Hochmuth A., Boehm T., Bitzer C., et al. Differentiation of breast masses using 3-D sonographic and echo-enhancer-based evaluation of the vascular pattern: Initial experiences. Ultrasound Med Biol 2002, 28:845-851.
34. Hsiao Y.H., Huang Y.L., Liang W.M., et al. Characterization of benign and malignant solid breast masses: Harmonic versus nonharmonic 3D power Doppler imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 2009, 35:353-359.
35. Rose S.C. Paradigm shifts provided by a new means of seeing the educational value of three-dimensional ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 2001, 20:937-940.
36. Smith W.L., Surry K.J., Mills G.R., et al. Three-dimensional ultrasound-guided core needle breast biopsy. Ultrasound Med Biol 2001, 27:81025-81034. http://www.sciencedirect.com.offcampus.lib.washington.edu/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6TD2-43TFJGN-2&_user=582538&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_acct=C000029718&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=582538&md5=52a55d3a91aad21daad453b301f53525.
37. Weismann C.F., Forstner R., Prokop E., et al. Three-dimensional targeting: A new three-dimensional ultrasound technique to evaluate needle position during breast biopsy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000, 16:359-364.
38. Chaiaie L.D., Terinde R. Three-dimensional ultrasound-validated large-core needle biopsy: Is it a reliable method for the histological assessment of breast lesions?. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004, 23:393-397.
39. Nelson T.R., Pretorius D.H., Riccabona M., et al. Sources and impact of artifacts on clinical three-dimensional ultrasound imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000, 16:374-383.
40. Saslow D., Boetes C., Burke W., et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 2007, 57:75-89.
41. Berg W.A. Tailored supplemental screening for breast cancer: What now and what next?. Am J Roentgenol 2009, 192:390-399.
42. Plevritis S.K., Kurian A.W., Sigal B.M., et al. Cost-effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging. JAMA 2006, 295:2374-2384.
43. Berg W.A. Supplemental screening sonography in dense breasts. Radiol Clin North Am 2004, 42:845-851.
44. Boyd N.F., Guo H., Martin L.J., et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007, 356:227-236.
45. Berg W.A., Blume J.D., Cormack J.B., et al. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA 2008, 299:2151-2163.
46. Corsetti V., Ferrari A., Ghirardi M., et al. Role of ultrasonography in detecting mammographically occult breast carcinoma in women with dense breasts. Radiol Med (Torino) 2006, 111:440-448.
47. Corsetti V., Houssami N., Ferrari A., et al. Breast screening with ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: Evidence on incremental cancer detection and false positives, and associated cost. Eur J Cancer 2008, 44:539-544.
48. Gordon P.B., Goldenberg S.L. Malignant breast masses detected only by ultrasound: A retrospective review. Cancer 1995, 76:626-630.
49. Buchberger W., Niehoff A., Obrist P., et al. Clinically and mammographically occult breast lesions: Detection and classification with high-resolution sonography. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2000, 21:325-336.
50. Kaplan S.S. Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue. Radiology 2001, 221:641-649.
51. Kolb T.M., Lichy J., Newhouse J.H. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: An analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 2002, 225:165-175.
52. Crystal P., Strano S.D., Shcharynski S., et al. Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts. Am J Roentgenol 2003, 181:177-182.
53. Leconte I., Feger C., Galant C., et al. Mammography and subsequent whole-breast sonography of nonpalpable breast cancers: The importance of radiologic breast density. Am J Roentgenol 2003, 180:1675-1679.
54. Berg W.A., Blume J.D., Cormack J.B., et al. Operator dependence of physician-performed whole-breast US: Lesion detection and characterization. Radiology 2006, 241:355-365.
55. Richter K., Heywang-Köbrunner S.H., Winzer K.J., et al. Detection of malignant and benign breast lesions with an automated US system: Results of 120 cases. Radiology 1997, 205:823-830.
56. Wenkel E., Heckmann M., Heinrich M., et al. Automated breast ultrasound: Lesion detection and BI-RADS classification-A pilot study. Rofo 2008, 180:804-808.
57. Ikedo Y., Fukuoka D., Hara T., et al. Development of a fully automatic scheme for detection of masses in whole breast ultrasound images. Med Phys 2007, 34:4378-4388.
58. Lehman C.D., André M.P., Fecht B.A., et al. Through-transmission US applied to breast imaging. Acad Radiol 2000, 7:100-107.
59. Park B.K., Moon W.K., Cha J.H., et al. Diffractive ultrasound in the evaluation of solid breast masses: Preliminary results. Invest Radiol 2005, 40:486-493.
60. Fenster A., Surry K.J., Mills G.R., et al. 3D ultrasound guided breast biopsy system. Ultrasonics 2004, 42:769-774.
61. Piron C.A., Causer P., Jong R., et al. A hybrid breast biopsy system combining ultrasound and MRI. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2003, 22:1100-1110.
62. Tang A.M., Kacher D.F., Lam E.Y., et al. Multi-modal imaging: Simultaneous MRI and ultrasound imaging for carotid arteries visualization. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2007, 2007:2603-2606.
63. Shinoura N., Takahashi M., Yamada R. Delineation of brain tumor margins using intraoperative sononavigation: Implications for tumor resection. J Clin Ultrasound 2006, 34:177-183.
64. Keles G.E., Lamborn K.R., Berger M.S. Coregistration accuracy and detection of brain shift using intraoperative sononavigation during resection of hemispheric tumors. Neurosurgery 2003, 53:556-564.
65. Singh A.K., Kruecker J., Xu S., et al. Initial clinical experience with real-time transrectal ultrasonography-magnetic resonance imaging fusion-guided prostate biopsy. BJU Int 2007, 110:841-845.
66. Ewertsen C., Grossjohann H.S., Nielsen K.R., et al. Biopsy guided by real-time sonography fused with MRI: A phantom study. Am J Roentgenol 2008, 190:1671-1674.
67. Coles C.E., Cash C.J., Treece G.M., et al. High definition three-dimensional ultrasound to localise the tumour bed: A breast radiotherapy planning study. Radiother Oncol 2007, 84:233-241.
68. Berrang T.S., Truong P.T., Popescu C., et al. 3D ultrasound can contribute to planning CT to define the target for partial breast radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009, 73:375-383.
69. Causer P.A., Piron C.A., Jong R.A., et al. Preliminary in vivo validation of a dedicated breast MRI and sonographic coregistration imaging system. Am J Roentgenol 2008, 191:1203-1207.