AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents: Topics in US - Beyond the Basics: Elasticity Imaging with US

Radiographics

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 1657-1671

  Hall, Timothy J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasms, diagnosis, 00.30; Physics; Ultrasound (us), elastography, 00.12989; Ultrasound (us), tissue characterization, 00.12989

Indexed keywords

ELASTICITY; IMAGING SYSTEM; IN VITRO STUDY; PALPATION; PHYSICS; RESIDENT; REVIEW; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0344824006     PISSN: 02715333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/rg.236035163     Document Type: Review

References (55)

1. Sariego J, Zrada S, Byrd M, Matsumoto T. Breast cancer in young patients. Am J Surg 1995; 170:243-245.
2. Peer PG, Verbeek AL, Ravunac MM, et al. Prognosis of younger and older patients with early breast cancer. Br J Cancer 1996; 73:382-385.
3. McPherson CP, Swenson KK, Jolitz G, Murray CL. Survival among women ages 40-49 years with breast carcinoma according to method of detection. Cancer 1997; 79:1923-1932.
4. Costanza ME, Edmiston KL. Breast cancer screening: early recognition. Compr Ther 1997; 23:7-12.
5. Yang WT, Mok CO, King W, Tang A, Metreweli C. Role of high frequency ultrasonography in the evaluation of palpable breast masses in Chinese women: alternative to mammography? J Ultrasound Med 1996; 15:637-644.
6. Boyd NF, Dite GS, Stone J, et al. Heritability of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002; 347:886-894.
7. Hou MF, Chuang HY, Ou-Yang F, et al. Comparison of breast mammography, sonography and physical examination for screening women at high risk of breast cancer in Taiwan. Ultrasound Med Biol 2002; 28:415-420.
8. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 2002; 225: 165-175.
9. Wang HC, Chen DR, Kao CH, et al. Detecting breast cancer in mammographically dense breasts: comparing technetium-99m tetrofosmin mammoscintigraphy and ultrasonography. Cancer Invest 2002; 20:932-938.
10. Saarenmaa I, Salminen T, Geiger U, et al. The effect of age and density of the breast on the sensitivity of breast cancer diagnostic by mammography and ultrasonography. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2001; 67:117-123.
11. Laya MB, Larson EB, Taplin SH, et al. Effect of estrogen replacement therapy on the specificity and sensitivity of screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 1996; 88:643-649.
12. Gao L, Parker KJ, Lerner RM, Levinson SF. Imaging of the elastic properties of tissue: a review. Ultrasound Med Biol 1996; 22:959-977.
13. Ophir J, Alam SK, Garra B, et al. Elastography: ultrasonic estimation and imaging of the elastic properties of tissues. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 1999; 213:203-233.
14. Tschoegl NW. The phenomenological theory of linear viscoelastic behavior: an introduction. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, 1989.
15. Fung YC. A first course in continuum mechanics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1994.
16. Fung YC. Biomechanics: mechanical properties of living tissues. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, 1993.
17. Krouskop TA, Wheeler TM, Kallel F, Garra BS, Hall T. Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression. Ultrason Imaging 1998; 20:260-274.
18. Wellman PS, Dalton EP, Krag D, et al. Tactile imaging of breast masses: first clinical report. Arch Surg 2001; 136:204-208.
19. Sarvazyan A. Mechanical imaging: a new technology for medical diagnostics. Int J Med Inf 1998; 49:195-216.
20. Dickinson RJ, Hill CR. Measurement of soft tissue motion using correlation between A-scans. Ultrasound Med Biol 1982; 8:263-271.
21. Wilson LS, Robinson DE. Ultrasonic measurement of small displacements and deformations of tissue. Ultrason Imaging 1982; 4:71-82.
22. Krouskop TA, Dougherty DA, Vinson FS. A pulsed Doppler ultrasonic system for making non-invasive measurements of the mechanical properties of soft tissue. J Rehabil Res Dev 1987; 24:1-8.
23. Yamakoshi Y, Sato J, Sato T. Ultrasonic imaging of internal vibration of soft tissue under forced vibration. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 1990; 37:45-53.
24. Lerner RM, Huang SR, Parker KJ. Sonoelasticity images derived from ultrasound signals in mechanically vibrated tissues. Ultrasound Med Biol 1990; 16:231-239.
25. Ophir J, Cespedes EI, Ponnekanti H, et al. Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrason Imaging 1991; 13:111-134.
26. O'Donnell M, Skovoroda A, Shapo B, Emelianov S. Internal displacement and strain imaging using ultrasonic speckle tracking. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 1994; 41:314-325.
27. Chaturvedi P, Insana MF, Hall TJ. 2-D companding for noise reduction in strain imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 1998; 45:179-191.
28. Insana MF, Chaturvedi P, Hall TJ, Bilgen M. 3-D companding using linear arrays for improved strain imaging. In: Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. New York, NY: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 1997; 1435-1438.
29. Zhu Y, Hall TJ. A modified block matching method for real-time freehand strain imaging. Ultrason Imaging 2002; 24:161-176.
30. Bilgen M, Insana MF. Elastostatics of a spherical inclusion in homogeneous biological media. Phys Med Biol 1998; 43:1-20.
31. Bilgen M, Insana MF. Deformation models and correlation analysis in elastography. J Acoust Soc Am 1996; 99:3212-3224.
32. Insana MF, Cook LT, Bilgen M, Chaturvedi P, Zhu Y. Maximum-likelihood approach to strain imaging using ultrasound. J Acoust Soc Am 2000; 107:1421-1434.
33. Garra BS, Cespedes EI, Ophir J, et al. Elastography of breast lesions: initial clinical results. Radiology 1997; 202:79-86.
34. Hall TJ, Zhu Y, Spalding CS. In vivo real-time freehand palpation imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003; 29:427-435.
35. Doyley M, Bamber JC, Fuechsel F, Bush NL. A freehand elastographic imaging approach for clinical breast imaging: system development and performance evaluation. Ultrasound Med Biol 2001; 27:1347-1357.
36. Trahey GE, Allison JW, von Ramm OT. Angle independent ultrasonic detection of blood flow. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1987; 34:965-967.
37. Merritt CR, Forsberg F, Liu J, Kallel F. In vivo elastography in animal models: feasibility studies (abstr). J Ultrasound Med 2002; 21:S98.
38. Lorenz A, Sommerfeld HJ, Garcia-Schurmann M, et al. A new system for the acquisition of ultrasonic multicompression strain images of the human prostate in vivo. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 1999; 46:1147-1154.
39. Dutt V, Kinnick RR, Muthupillai R, Oliphant TE, Ehman RL, Greenleaf JF. Acoustic shear-wave imaging using echo ultrasound compared to magnetic resonance elastography. Ultrasound Med Biol 2000; 26:397-403.
40. Sandrin L, Tanter M, Catheline S, Fink M. Shear modulus imaging with 2-D transient elastography. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2002; 49:426-435.
41. Sandrin L, Tanter M, Gennisson JL, Catheline S, Fink M. Shear elasticity probe for soft tissues with 1-D transient elastography. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2002; 49:436-446.
42. Skovoroda AR, Emelianov SY, O'Donnell M. Tissue elasticity reconstruction based on ultrasonic displacement and strain images. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 1995; 42:747-765.
43. Sumi C, Suzuki A, Nakayama K. Estimation of shear modulus distribution in soft-tissue from strain distribution. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1995; 42:193-202.
44. Kallel F, Bertrand M. Tissue elasticity reconstruction using linear perturbation method. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1996; 15:299-313.
45. Doyley M, Meaney PM, Bamber JC. Evaluation of an iterative reconstruction method for quantitative elastography. Phys Med Biol 2000; 45:1521-1540.
46. Zhu Y, Hall TJ, Jiang J. A finite-element approach for Young's modulus reconstruction. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2003; 22:890-901.
47. Nightingale KR, Palmeri ML, Nightingale RW, Trahey GE. On the feasibility of remote palpation using acoustic radiation force. J Acoust Soc Am 2001; 110:625-634.
48. Fatemi M, Greenleaf JF. Application of radiation force in noncontact measurement of the elastic parameters. Ultrason Imaging 1999; 21:147-154.
49. Tanter M, Bercoff J, Sandrin L, Fink M. Ultrafast compound imaging for 2-D motion vector estimation: application to transient elastography. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2002; 49:1363-1374.
50. Fatemi M, Greenleaf JF. Ultrasound-stimulated vibro-acoustic spectrography. Science 1998; 280:82-85.
51. Fatemi M, Wold LE, Alizad A, Greenleaf JF. Vibro-acoustic tissue mammography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2002; 21:1-8.
52. Chaturvedi P, Insana MF, Hall TJ. Testing the limitations of 2-D companding for strain imaging using phantoms. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 1998; 45:1022-1031.
53. Hein IA, O'Brien WD. Current time-domain methods for assessing tissue motion by analysis from reflected ultrasound echoes: a review. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 1993; 40:84-102.
54. Carter GC. Coherence and time-delay estimation: an applied tutorial for research, development, test, and evaluation engineers. New York, NY: IEEE Press, 1993.
55. Madsen EL, Frank FR, Krouskop TA, et al. Low-contrast spherical lesion phantoms for assessing elastography performance (abstr). Ultrason Imaging 2003; 25:61.