Characterization of sonographically detected breast lesions using three-dimensional data sets;Dignitätsbeurteilung mammasonographischer herde mittels dreidimensionaler darstellung

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 178, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 1224-1234

  Fischer, Thomas ^a   Filimonow, S ^a   Hamm, B ^a   Slowinski, T ^a   Thomas, A ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Breast; Ultrasound; Ultrasound power Doppler

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST ABSCESS; BREAST ADENOMA; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST FIBROADENOMA; BREAST FIBROSIS; BREAST HAMARTOMA; BREAST LESION; BREAST PAPILLOMA; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FIBROCYSTIC BREAST DISEASE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MUCINOUS CARCINOMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; ULTRASOUND; ADULT; AGED; BLOOD VESSEL; BREAST; BREAST DISEASE; BREAST TUMOR; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ECHOGRAPHY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; IMAGE PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDLE BIOPSY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; RISK; ROC CURVE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; VASCULARIZATION;

ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BLOOD VESSELS; BREAST; BREAST DISEASES; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; ODDS RATIO; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 33846950823     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-927061     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Lorenzen J, Wedel AK, Lisboa BW et al. Diagnostische Mammographie und Sonographie: Korrelation von diagnostischer BI-RADS-Einstufung mit dem histologischen und klinischen Endbefund. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2005; 177: 1545-1551
2. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 2002; 225: 165-175
3. Schulz-Wendtland R, Bock K, Aichinger U et al. Ultrasound examination of the breast with 7.5 MHz and 13 MHz-transducers: scope for improving diagnostic accuracy in complementary breast diagnostics? Ultraschall in Med 2005; 26: 209-215
4. Berg WA, Gutierrez L, Ness Aiver MS et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 2004; 233: 830-849
5. Geller BM, Vacek PM, Skelly J et al. The use of additional imaging increased specificity and decreased sensitivity in screening mammography. J Clin Epidermiol 2005; 58: 942-950
6. Fischer T, Filimonow S, Taupitz M et al. Bildqualität und Detektion pathologischer Prozesse im Ultraschallbild: Vergleich von B-Bild-Sonographie mit photopischer Bildgebung und harmonischer Bildgebung einzeln und in Kombination. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2002; 174: 1313-1317
7. Benoit B, Chaoui R. Three-dimensional ultrasound with maximal mode rendering: a novel technique for the diagnosis of bilateral or unilateral absence or hypoplasia of nasal bones in second-trimester screening for Down syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 25: 19-24
8. Kostsianos D, Wirth S, Fischer T et al. 3D ultrasound in the diagnosis of focal breast lesions. Radiologe 2005; 45: 237-244
9. Cho KR, Seo BK, Lee JY et al. A comparative study of 2D and 3D ultrasonography for evaluation of solid breast masses. Eur J Radiol 2005; 54: 365-370
10. Blohmer JU, Bollmann R, Heinrich G et al. Three-dimensional ultrasound study (3D-sonography) for female breast. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 1996; 56: 161-165
11. American College of Radiology (ACR). Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS®) Breast Imaging Atlas. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2003
12. Watermann DO, Foldi M, Hanjalic-Beck A et al. Three-dimensional ultrasound for the assessment of breast lesions. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 25: 592-598
13. Schulz-Wendtland R, Aichinger U, Kramer S et al. Sonographisch gezielte Stanzbiopsie: Wie viele Biopsiezylinder sind notwendig? Fortschr Röntgenstr 2003; 175: 94-98
14. Hong AS, Rosen EL, Soo MS et al. BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative values of sonographic features. AJR 2005; 184: 1260-1265
15. Jung EM, Clevert DA, Lutz R et al. Tissue Harmonic Imaging (THI) zur präoperativen sonographischen Markierung von Mammaherden. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2002; 174: 1121-1125
16. Obenauer S, Hermann KP, Grabbe E. Applications and literature review of the BI-RADS classification. Eur Radiol 2005; 15: 1027-1036
17. Skaane P, Engedal K. Analysis of sonographic features in the differentiation of fibroadenoma and invasive ductal carcinoma. AJR 1998; 170: 191-199
18. Chao TC, Lo YF, Chen SC et al. Prospective sonographic study of 3093 breast tumors. J Ultrasound Med 1999; 18: 363-370
19. Zonderland HM, Hermans J, Coerkamp EG. Ultrasound variables and ther prognostic value in a population of 1103 patients with 272 breast cancers. Eur Radiol 2000; 10: 1562-1568
20. Schelling M, Gnirs J, Braun M et al. Optimized diffential diagnosis of breast lesions by combined B-mode and color Doppler sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997; 10: 48-53
21. Kook SH, Park HW, Lee YR et al. Evaluation of solid breast lesions with power Doppler sonography. J Clin Ultrasound 1999; 27: 231-237
22. Graf O, Helbich TH, Fuchsjager MH et al. Sonographische Verlaufskontrollen bei palpablen soliden, wahrscheinlich gutartigen Brustläsionen (BI-RADSTM Kategorie III). Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 1251-1256
23. Birrenbach S, Miller S, Stern W et al. Klinischer Stellenwert bildgebender Verfahren im ersten Jahr nach brusterhaltender Therapie des Mammakarzinoms. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 1423-1430
24. Graf O, Obermayer M, Scheurecker A et al. Diagnoseform und Tumorstadien von Mammakarzinomen unter Bedingungen des opportunistischen Screenings. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2006; 178: 221-226