A comparative study of 2D and 3D ultrasonography for evaluation of solid breast masses

European Journal of Radiology

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 365-370

  Kyu, Ran Cho ^a   Bo, Kyoung Seo ^b   June, Young Lee ^c   Pisano, Etta D ^d   Bo, Kyung Je ^a   Ji, Young Lee ^a   Eun, Jeong Choi ^a   Kyoo, Byung Chung ^a   Yu, Whan Oh ^a  

^a Korea University Ansan Hospital   (South Korea)

^b Konkuk University Hospital   (South Korea)

^c Korea University   (South Korea)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast, diagnosis; Breast, US; Ultrasound (US); Ultrasound (US), comparative studies; Ultrasound (US), Technology

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGING TECHNIQUES; RADIOLOGY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TUMORS;

MICROCALCIFICATIONS; RADIOLOGISTS; SOLID BREAST MASSES; TWO-DIMENSIONAL AND THREE-DIMENSIONAL (2D AND 3D) ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

ULTRASONIC APPLICATIONS;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CALCIFICATION; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CLINICAL FEATURE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; OBSERVER VARIATION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; RATING SCALE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOLID TUMOR; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; OBSERVER VARIATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 19344374718     PISSN: 0720048X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.07.006     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Stewart BW, Kleihues P. World cancer report. World Health Organization, 2003.
2. M.B. Laya, E.B. Larson, S.H. Taplin, and E. White Effect of estrogen replacement therapy on the specificity and sensitivity of screening mammography J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 88 1996 643 649
3. H.C. Burrell, D.M. Sibbering, and A.R. Wilson Screening interval breast cancers: mammographic features and prognosis factors Radiology 199 1996 811 817
4. A.B. Hollingsworth, L.D. Taylor, and D.C. Rhodes Establishing a histologic basis for false-negative mammograms Am. J. Surg. 166 1993 643 647
5. P.A. Harper, E. Kelly-Fry, J.S. Noe, R.J. Bies, and V.P. Jackson Ultrasound in the evaluation of solid breast masses Radiology 146 1983 731 736
6. S.H. Heywang, E.R. Lipsit, L.M. Glassman, and M.A. Thomas Specificity of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of benign breast masses J. Ultrasound Med. 3 1984 453 461
7. S.W. Hilton, G.R. Leopold, L.K. Olson, and S.A. Wilson Real-time breast sonography: application in 300 consecutive patients AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 147 1986 479 486
8. B.K. Seo, Y.W. Oh, and H.R. Kim Sonographic evaluation of breast nodules: comparison of conventional, real-time compound, and pulse-inversion harmonic images Korean J. Radiol. 2 2002 38 44
9. T.M. Kolb, J. Lichy, and J.H. Newhouse Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US-diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics Radiology 207 1998 191 199
10. A.T. Stavros, D. Thickman, C.L. Rapp, M.A. Dennis, S.H. Parker, and G.A. Sisney Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions Radiology 196 1995 123 134
11. B.D. Donal, F. Aaron, and C.W. Facqueline Clinical utility of three-D US Radiographics 20 2000 559 571
12. H.J. Lee, B.I. Choi, and J.K. Han Three-D US using the minimum transparent mode in obstructive biliary diseases; early experience J. Ultrasound Med. 21 2002 443 453
13. T.L. Elliot, D.B. Downey, S. Tong, C. McLean, and A. Fenster Accuracy of prostate volume measurements in vitro using three-D ultrasound Acad. Radiol. 3 1996 401 406
14. S. Tong, H.N. Cardinal, D.B. Downey, and A. Fenster Analysis of linear, area, and volume distortion in 3D ultrasound imaging Ultrasound Med. Biol. 24 1998 355 373
15. T. Hata, T. Yonehara, S. Aoki, A. Manabe, K. Hata, and K. Miyazaki Three D sonographic visualization of the fetal face AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 170 1998 481 483
16. I.M.G. Kelly, J.E. Gardener, A.D. Brett, R. Richards, and W.R. Lees Three D US of the fetus Radiology 192 1994 253 259
17. D. Rotten, J.M. Levaillant, and L. Zerat Analysis of normal breast tissue and of solid breast masses using three-dimensional ultrasound mammography Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 14 1999 114 124
18. C.F. Weismann, R. Forstner, E. Prokop, and T. Rettenbacher Three-D targeting: a new three-D ultrasound technique to evaluate needle position during breast biopsy Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 16 2000 359 364
19. A. Fenster, D.B. Downey, and H.N. Cardinal Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging Phys. Med. Biol. 46 2001 67 99
20. G.M. Treece, A.H. Gee, R.W. Prager, C.J. Cash, and L.H. Berman High-definition freehand 3-D ultrasound Ultrasound Med. Biol. 29 2003 529 546
21. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS®)-Ultrasound. 1st ed. Reston, Va: ©American College of Radiology, 2003.
22. B.D. Fornage, J.G. Lorigan, and E. Andry Fibroadenoma of the breast: US appearance Radiology 172 1989 671 675
23. G. Rahbar, A.C. Sie, and G.C. Hansen Benign versus malignant solid breast masses: US differentiation Radiology 213 1999 889 894
24. 3 J. Ultrasound Med. 9 1990 559 568
25. P.M. Jokich, D.L. Monticciolo, and Y.T. Adler Breast ultrasonography Radiol. Clin. North Am. 30 1992 993 1009
26. D.B. Kopans, J.E. Meyer, K.K. Lindfors, and S.S. Bucchianeri Breast sonography to guide cyst aspiration and wire localization of occult solid lesions AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 143 1984 489 492
27. D. Rotten, J.M. Levaillant, E. Constancis, A. Collet Billon, Y. Le Guerinel, and P. Rua Three-dimensional imaging of solid breast tumors with ultrasound: preliminary data and analysis of its possible contribution to the understanding of standard two-dimensional sonographic images Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 1 1991 384 390
28. Weismann CF, Kainberger P, Auer A, Datz L, Hollerweger A, Macheiner P. Documentation of 2D- vs. 3D-sonography of solid breast lesions: observer variability of lesion description and evaluation. European Congress of Radiology 2002 Annual Meeting.