Haptic Virtual Fixture for Robotic Cardiac Catheter Navigation

Artificial Organs

Volumn 35, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 1127-1131

  Park, Jun Woo ^a,b   Choi, Jaesoon ^a,b   Park, Yongdoo ^a,b   Sun, Kyung ^a,b,c  

^a Korea Artificial Organ Center   (South Korea)

^b Korea University   (South Korea)

^c Korea University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Forbidden region; Image analysis; Robotic catheter navigation; Virtual fixture

Indexed keywords

BLOOD VESSELS; DIAGNOSIS; EDGE DETECTION; FIXTURES (TOOLING); PHANTOMS; ROBOTICS; ROBOTS;

FORBIDDEN REGION; HAPTICS; IMAGE-ANALYSIS; IMAGING DEVICE; ROBOTIC CATHETER NAVIGATION; VESSEL PHANTOM; VESSEL WALLS; VIRTUAL FIXTURE; VIRTUAL FORCES; X-RAY FLUOROSCOPY;

CATHETERS;

ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL WALL; FORBIDDEN REGION VIRTUAL FIXTURE; HEART CATHETER; HEART CATHETERIZATION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; IN VITRO STUDY; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROBOTICS; VASCULARIZATION;

EID: 81855204966     PISSN: 0160564X     EISSN: 15251594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2011.01373.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Saliba W, Reddy VY, Wazni O, etal. Atrial fibrillation ablation using a robotic catheter remote control system: initial human experience and long-term follow-up results. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:2407-11.
2. Steven D, Servatius H, Rostock T, etal. Reduced fluoroscopy during atrial fibrillation ablation: benefits of robotic guided navigation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2010;21:6-12.
3. Dewire J, Calkins H. State-of-the-art and emerging technologies for atrial fibrillation ablation. Nat Rev Cardiol 2010;7:129-38.
4. Burkhardt JD, Natale A. New technologies in atrial fibrillation ablation. Circulation 2009;120:1533-41.
5. Bunch TJ, Asirvatham SJ, Friedman PA, etal. Outcomes after cardiac perforation during radiofrequency ablation of the atrium. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2005;16:1172-9.
6. Fu Y, Liu H, Huang W, Wang S, Liang Z. Steerable catheters in minimally invasive vascular surgery. Int J Med Robot 2009;5:381-91.
7. Chun KR, Schmidt B, Köktürk B, etal. Catheter ablation-new developments in robotics. Herz 2008;33:586-9.
8. Ernst S. Robotic approach to catheter ablation. Curr Opin Cardiol 2008;23:28-31.
9. Wikipedia. Sensei Robotic Catheter System. [updated 28 March 2011]. Available at: Accessed May 12, 2011.
10. Reddy VY, Neuzil P, Malchano ZJ, etal. View-synchronized robotic image-guided therapy for atrial fibrillation ablation: experimental validation and clinical feasibility. Circulation 2007;115:2705-14.
11. Rosenberg LB. Virtual fixtures: perceptual tools for telerobotic manipulation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium. 1993;76-82.
12. Abbott JJ, Marayong P, Okamura AM. Haptic virtual fixtures for robot-assisted manipulation. Springer Tracts Adv Robot 2007;28:49-64.
13. Li M, Ishii M, Taylor RH. Spatial motion constraints using virtual fixtures generated by anatomy. IEEE T Robot 2007;23:4-19.
14. Li M, Okamura AM. Recognition of operator motions for real-time assistance using virtual fixtures. In Proceedings of the 11th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. 2003;125-31.
15. Bettini A, Marayong P, Lang S, Okamura AM, Hager GD. Vision-assisted control for manipulation using virtual fixtures. IEEE T Robot 2004;20:953-66.
16. Park JW, Choi J, Pak HN, etal. Development of a force-reflecting robotic platform for cardiac catheter navigation. Artif Organs 2010;34:1034-9.
17. Wieczorek M, Salili AR, Kaubisch S, Hoeltgen R. Catheter ablation of non-sustained focal right atrial tachycardia guided by virtual non-contact electrograms. Europace 2011;13(6):876-82.
18. Fronek A, Criqui MH, Denenberg J, Langer RD. Common femoral vein dimensions and hemodynamics including Valsalva response as a function of sex, age, and ethnicity in a population study. J Vasc Surg 2001;33:1050-6.
19. Jayender J, Azizian M, Patel RV. Autonomous image-guided robot-assisted active catheter insertion. IEEE T Robot 2008;24:858-71.