The effects of inbreeding, genetic dissimilarity and phenotype on male reproductive success in a dioecious plant

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 279, Issue 1726, 2011, Pages 91-100

  Austerlitz, Frédéric ^a,g   Gleiser, Gabriela ^b,f   Teixeira, Sara ^c,d   Bernasconi, Giorgina ^b,d,e  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SUD   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEUCHÂTEL   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALGARVE   (Portugal)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^e UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^f LABORATORIO ECOTONO   (Argentina)

^g UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

Author keywords

Fitness; Inbreeding; Plant; Pollen; Relatedness

Indexed keywords

FITNESS; GENE FLOW; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC STRUCTURE; GERMINATION; HERB; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; MALE; MATING BEHAVIOR; PHENOTYPE; POLLEN; POLLINATION; RELATEDNESS; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SEXUAL DIMORPHISM;

EID: 81855193657     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2011.0652     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Bernasconi, G. 2003 Seed paternity in flowering plants: an evolutionary perspective. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 6, 149-158. (doi:10.1078/1433-8319.00075)
2. Marshall, D. L. & Ellstrand, N. C. 1985 Proximal causes of multiple paternity in wild radish, Raphanus sativus. Am. Nat. 126, 596-605. (doi:10.1086/284441)
3. Teixeira, S. & Bernasconi, G. 2007 High prevalence of multiple paternity within fruits in natural populations of Silene latifolia, as revealed by microsatellite DNA analysis. Mol. Ecol. 16, 4370-4379.(doi:10.1111/j.1365-294.X. 2007.03493.x)
4. Bernasconi, G. et al. 2004 Evolutionary ecology of the prezygotic stage. Science 303, 971-975.(doi:10.1126/ science.1092180)
5. Marshall, D. L. and Folsom, M. W. 1991 Mate choice in plants: an anatomical to population perspective. Annu. Rev. Ecol. System. 22, 37-63.(doi:10.1146/annurev.es. 22.110191.000345)
6. Mulcahy, D. L. 1979 The rise of the angiosperms: a genecological factor. Science 206, 20-23. (doi:10.1126/ science.206.4414.20)
7. Van Rossum, F. 2009 Pollen dispersal and genetic variation in an early-successional forest herb in a peri-urban forest. Plant Biol. 11, 725-737. (doi:10.1111/j.1438-8677.2008.00176.x)
8. Harder, L. D. and Barrett, S. C. H. 1996 Pollen dispersal and mating patterns in animal-pollinated plants. In Floral biology: studies on floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants (eds D. G. Lloyd and S. C. H. Barrett), pp. 140-190. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall.
9. Johnson, S. D., Neal, P. R. and Harder, L. D. 2005 Pollen fates and the limits on male reproductive success in an orchid population. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 86, 175-190. (doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00541.x)
10. Skogsmyr, I. and Lankinen, A. 2002 Sexual selection: an evolutionary force in plants? Biol. Rev. Camb Philos. Soc. 77, 537-562. (doi:10.1017/S1464793102005973)
11. Nasrallah, J. B. 2002 Recognition and rejection of self in plant reproduction. Science 296, 305-308. (doi:10.1126/science.296.5566.305)
12. Hauser, T. P. and Siegismund, H. R. 2000 Inbreeding and outbreeding effects on pollen fitness and zygote survival in Silene nutans (Caryophyllaceae). J. Evol. Biol. 13, 446-454. (doi:10.1046/j.1420-91012000.00183.x)
13. Hiscock, S. J. and Tabah, D. A. 2003 The different mechanisms of sporophytic self-incompatibility. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 358, 1037-1045. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2003.1297)
14. Mazer, S. J. and Gorchov, D. L. 1996 Parental effects on progeny phenotype in plants: distinguishing genetic and environmental causes. Evolution 50, 44-53. (doi:10. 2307/2410779)
15. Teixeira, S., Foerster, K. and Bernasconi, G. 2009 Evidence for inbreeding depression and post-pollination selection against inbreeding in the dioecious plant Silene latifolia. Heredity 102, 101-112. (doi:10.1038/hdy.2008.86)
16. Roberts, S. C. and Little, A. C. 2008 Good genes, complementary genes and human mate preferences. Genetica 134, 31-43.(doi:10.1007/s10709-008-9254-x)
17. Mays, H. L. and Hill, G. E. 2004 Choosing mates: good genes versus genes that are a good fit. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 554-559. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.07.018)
18. Johnson, A. M., Chappell, G., Price, A. C., Rodd, F. H., Olendorf, R. and Hughes, K. A. 2010 Inbreeding depression and inbreeding avoidance in a natural population of guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Ethology 116, 448-457 (doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2010.01763.x)
19. Waser, N. M. and Price, M. V. 1989 Optimal outcrossing in Ipomopsis aggregata: seed set and offspring fitness. Evolution 43, 1097-1109. (doi:10.2307/2409589)
20. Waser, N. M. 1993 Population structure, optimal outbreeding, and assortative mating in angiosperms. In The natural history of inbreeding and outbreeding: theoretical and empirical perspectives (ed. N. M. Thornhill), pp. 173-199. Chicago, IL: Universty of Chicago Press.
21. Gerard, P. R., Klein, E. K., Austerlitz, F., Fernandez- Manjarres, J. F. and Frascaria-Lacoste, N. 2006 Assortative mating and differential male mating success in an ash hybrid zone population. BMC Evol. Biol. 6, 96. (doi:10. 1186/1471-2148-6-96)
22. Oddou-Muratorio, S., Klein, E. K. and Austerlitz, F. 2005 Pollen flow in the wildservice tree, Sorbus torminalis (L.) Crantz. II. Pollen dispersal and heterogeneity in mating success inferred from parent-offspring analysis. Mol. Ecol. 14, 4441-4452. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-294.X.2005.02720.x)
23. Meagher, T. R. and Vassiliadis, C. 2003 Spatial geometry determines gene flow in plant populations. In Genes in the environment (eds R. S. Hails, J. E. Beringer and H. C. J. Godfray), pp. 76-90. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
24. Robledo-Arnuncio, J. J. and Austerlitz, F. 2006 Pollen dispersal in spatially aggregated populations. Am. Nat. 168, 500-511. (doi:10.1086/507881)
25. Charlesworth, D. and Willis, J. H. 2009 The genetics of inbreeding depression. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10, 783-796. (doi:10.1038/nrg2664)
26. Stephenson, A. G., Hayes, C. N., Johannsson, M. H. and Winsor, J. A. 2001 The performance of microgametophytes is affected by inbreeding depression and hybrid vigor in the sporophytic generation. Sex. Plant Reprod. 14, 77-83. (doi:10.1007/s004970100081)
27. Busch, J.W. 2005 Inbreeding depression in self-incompatible and self-compatible populations of Leavenworthia alabamica. Heredity 94, 159-165. (doi:10.1038/sj.hdy. 6800584)
28. Johannsson, M. H., Gates, M. J. and Stephenson, A. G. 1998 Inbreeding depression affects pollen performance in Cucurbita texana. J. Evol. Biol. 11, 579-588. (doi:10. 1046/j.1420-9101.1998.11050579.x)
29. Melser, C., Bijleveld, A. and Klinkhamer, P. G. 1999 Lateacting inbreeding depression in both male and female function of Echium vulgare (Boraginaceae). Heredity 83, 162-170. (doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6885680)
30. Meagher, S., Penn, D. J. and Potts, W. K. 2000 Male-male competition magnifies inbreeding depression in wild house mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 3324-3329. (doi:10.1073/pnas.060284797)
31. Michalczyk, L., Martin, O. Y., Millard, A. L., Emerson, B. C. and Gage, M. J. 2010 Inbreeding depresses sperm competitiveness, but not fertilization or mating success in male Tribolium castaneum. Proc. R. Soc. B 277, 3483-3491. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.0514)
32. Slate, J., Kruuk, L. E., Marshall, T. C., Pemberton, J. M. and Clutton-Brock, T. H. 2000 Inbreeding depression influences lifetime breeding success in a wild population of red deer (Cervus elaphus). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267, 1657-1662. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1192)
33. Barluenga, M., Austerlitz, F., Elzinga, J. A., Teixeira, S., Goudet, J. and Bernasconi, G. 2011 Fine-scale spatial genetic structure and gene dispersal in Silene latifolia. Heredity 106, 13-24. (doi:10.1038/hdy.2010.38)
34. Richards, C. M. 2000 Inbreeding depression and genetic rescue in a plant metapopulation. Am. Nat. 155, 383-394. (doi:10.1086/303324)
35. Richards, C. M., Church, S. and McCauley, D. E. 1999 The influence of population size and isolation on gene flow by pollen in Silene alba. Evolution 53, 63-73. (doi:10.2307/2640920)
36. Richards, C. M., Emery, S. N. and McCauley, D. E. 2003 Genetic and demographic dynamics of small populations of Silene latifolia. Heredity 90, 181-186. (doi:10.1038/sj. hdy.6800214)
37. Ingvarsson, P. K. 2001 Restoration of genetic variation lost: the genetic rescue hypothesis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 62-63. (doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(00)02065-6)
38. Tallmon, D. A., Luikart, G. and Waples, R. S. 2004 The alluring simplicity and complex reality of genetic rescue. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 489-496. (doi:10.1016/j.tree. 2004.07.003)
39. Meagher, T. R. 1994 The quantitative genetics of sexual dimorphism in Silene latifolia (Caryophyllaceae). II. Response to sex-specific selection. Evolution 48, 939-951.
40. Shykoff, J. A. and Bucheli, E. 1995 Pollinator visitation patterns, floral rewards and the probability of transmission of Microbotryum violaceum, a venereal disease of plants. J. Ecol. 83, 189-198. (doi:10.2307/2261557)
41. Delph, L. F., Gehring, J. L., Frey, F. M., Arntz, A. M. and Levri, M. 2004 Genetic constraints on floral evolution in a sexually dimorphic plant revealed by artificial selection. Evolution 58, 1936-1946.
42. Steven, J. C., Delph, L. F. and Brodie III, E. D. 2007 Sexual dimorphism in the quantitative-genetic architecture of floral, leaf, and allocation traits in Silene latifolia. Evolution 61, 42-57. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007. 00004.x)
43. Jolivet, C. and Bernasconi, G. 2007 Within/between population crosses reveal genetic basis for siring success in Silene latifolia (Caryophyllaceae). J. Evol. Biol. 20, 1361-1374. (doi:10.1111/j.1420-91012007.01344.x)
44. Wolfe, L. M. 2002 Why alien invaders succeed: support for the escape-from-enemy hypothesis. Am. Nat. 160, 705-711. (doi:10.1086/343872)
45. Westergaard, M. 1958 The mechanism of sex determination in dioecious flowering plants. Adv. Genet. 9, 217-281. (doi:10.1016/S0065-2660(08)60163-7)
46. Young, H. J. 2002 Diurnal and nocturnal pollination of Silene alba (Caryophyllaceae). Am. J. Bot. 89, 433-440. (doi:10.3732/ajb.89.3.433)
47. Brantjes, N. B. M. 1976 Prevention of super parasitation of Melandrium flowers (Caryophyllaceae) by Hadena (Lepidoptera). Oecologia 24, 1-6. (doi:10.1007/ BF00545483)
48. Labouche, A. M. and Bernasconi, G. 2010 Male moths provide mutualistic benefits in the Silene latifolia- Hadena bicruris pollination, seed predation system. Funct. Ecol. 24, 534-544. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435. 2009.01658.x)
49. Teixeira, S. and Bernasconi, G. 2008 Effects of inbred/ outbred crosses on progeny sex ratio in Silene latifolia (Caryophyllaceae). New Phytol. 178, 448-456. (doi:10. 1111/j.1469-81372007.02366.x)
50. Rousset, F. 2008 GENEPOP'007: a complete re-implementation of the GENEPOP software for Windows and Linux. Mol. Ecol. Res. 8, 103-106. (doi:10.1111/j.1471-82862007.01931.x)
51. Marshall, T. C., Slate, J., Kruuk, L. E. and Pemberton, J. M. 1998 Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol. Ecol. 7, 639-655. (doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00374.x)
52. Kalinowski, S. T., Taper, M. L. and Marshall, T. C. 2007 Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol. Ecol. 16, 1099-1106. (doi:10.1111/j. 1365-294X.2007.03089.x)
53. Jamieson, A. and Taylor, S. C. 1997 Comparisons of three probability formulae for parentage exclusion. Anim. Genet. 28, 397-400. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-20521997. 00186.x)
54. Oddou-Muratorio, S., Houot, M. L., Demesure-Musch, B. and Austerlitz, F. 2003 Pollen flow in the wildservice tree, Sorbus torminalis (L.) Crantz. I. Evaluating the paternity analysis procedure in continuous populations. Mol. Ecol. 12, 3427-3439. (doi:10.1046/j.1365-294X. 2003.01989.x)
55. Devlin, B. and Ellstrand, N. C. 1990 The development and application of a refined method for estimating gene flow from angiosperm paternity analysis. Evolution 44, 248-259. (doi:10.2307/2409404)
56. Burczyk, J., Adams, W. T., Moran, G. F. and Griffin, A. R. 2002 Complex patterns of mating revealed in a Eucalyptus regnans seed orchard using allozyme markers and the neighbourhood model. Mol. Ecol. 11, 2379-2391. (doi:10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01603.x)
57. Adams, W. T. and Birkes, D. S. 1991 Estimating mating patterns in forest tree populations. In Biochemical markers in the population genetics of forest trees (eds S. Fineschi, M. E. Mavolti, F. Cannata and H. H. Hattemer), pp. 157-172. The Hague, The Netherlands: Academic Publishing.
58. Smouse, P. E., Meagher, T. R. and Kobak, C. J. 1999 Parentage analysis in Chamaelirium luteum (L.) Gray (Liliaceae): why do some males have higher reproductive contributions? J. Evol. Biol. 12, 1069-1077. (doi:10. 1046/j.1420-91011999.00114.x)
59. Burczyk, J., Adams, W. T., Birkes, D. S. and Chybicki, I. J. 2006 Using genetic markers to directly estimate gene flow and reproductive success parameters in plants on the basis of naturally regenerated seedlings. Genetics 173, 363-372. (doi:10.1534/genetics.105.046805)
60. Clark, J. S. 1998 Why trees migrate so fast: confronting theory with dispersal biology and the paleorecord. Am. Nat. 152, 204-224. (doi:10.1086/286162)
61. Austerlitz, F., Dick, C. W., Dutech, C., Klein, E. K., Oddou-Muratorio, S., Smouse, P. E. and Sork, V. L. 2004 Using genetic markers to estimate the pollen dispersal curve. Mol. Ecol. 13, 937-954. (doi:10.1111/j.1365- 294X.2004.02100.x)
62. Lande, R. and Arnold, S. J. 1983 The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37, 1210- 1226. (doi:10.2307/2408842)
63. Wright, J. W. and Meagher, T. R. 2004 Selection on floral characters in natural Spanish populations of Silene latifolia. J. Evol. Biol. 17, 382-395. (doi:10.1046/j.1420- 9101.2003.00671.x)
64. Kaplan, N. L., Hill, W. G. and Weir, B. S. 1995 Likelihood methods for locating disease genes in non-equilibrium populations. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 56, 18-32.
65. Meagher, T. R. 1992 The quantitative genetics of sexual dimorphism in Silene latifolia (Caryophyllaceae). I. Genetic variation. Evolution 46, 445-457. (doi:10. 2307/2409863)
66. Delph, L. F.,Gehring, J. L.,Arntz, A. M., Levri, M.andFrey, F. M. 2005 Genetic correlations with floral display lead to sexual dimorphism in the cost of reproduction. Am. Nat. 166(Suppl. 4), S31-S41. (doi:10.1086/444597)
67. Delph, L. F., Knapczyc, F. N. and Taylor, D. R. 2002 Among-population variation and correlations in sexually dimorphic traits of Silene latifolia. J. Evol. Biol. 15, 1011-1020. (doi:10.1046/j.1420-91012002.00467.x)
68. Burkhardt, A., Internicola, A. and Bernasconi, G. 2009 Effects of pollination timing on seed paternity and seed mass in Silene latifolia (Caryophyllaceae). Ann. Bot. 104, 767-773. (doi:10.1093/aob/mcp154)
69. Frank, S. A. and Slatkin, M. 1992 Fisher's fundamental theorem of natural selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 7, 92-95 (doi:10.1016/01695347(92)90248-A)
70. Orr, H. A. 2000 Adaptation and the cost of complexity. Evolution 54, 13-20. (doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000. tb00002.x)
71. Otto, S. P. 2004 Two steps forward, one step back: the pleiotropic effects of favoured alleles. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271, 705-714. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2635)
72. Keightley, P. D. and Hill, W. G. 1990 Variation maintained in quantitative traits with mutation selection balance: pleiotropic side-effects on fitness traits. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 242, 95-100. (doi:10.1098/rspb. 1990.0110)
73. Delph, L. F. 2007 The genetic integration of sexually dimorphic traits in the dioecious plant, Silene latifolia. In Sex, size and gender roles. Evolutionary studies of sexual size dimorphism (eds D. J. Farbaim, W. U. Blanckenhorn and T. Szekely), pp. 115-123. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
74. Cox, R. M. and Calsbeek, R. 2009 Sexually antagonistic selection, sexual dimorphism, and the resolution of intralocus sexual conflict. Am. Nat. 173, 176-187. (doi:10. 1086/595841)
75. Delph, L. F., Arntz, A.M., Scotti-Saintagne, C. and Scotti, I. 2010 The genomic architecture of sexual dimorphism in the dioecious plant Silene latifolia. Evolution 64, 2873-2886. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-56462010.01048.x)