Inbreeding Depression and Inbreeding Avoidance in a Natural Population of Guppies (Poecilia reticulata)

Ethology

Volumn 116, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 448-457

  Johnson, Ashley M ^a   Chappell, Grace ^a   Price, Anna C ^b   Helen Rodd, F ^b   Olendorf, Robert ^a   Hughes, Kimberly A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLOR MORPH; CYPRINID; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FITNESS; GENETIC VARIATION; HETEROZYGOSITY; INBREEDING AVOIDANCE; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; MATING SUCCESS; NATURAL SELECTION; POLYMORPHISM; WILD POPULATION;

CYPRINODONTIFORMES; POECILIA RETICULATA;

EID: 77953173042     PISSN: 01791613     EISSN: 14390310     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2010.01763.x     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Barson N J, Cable J, van Oosterhout C. Population genetic analysis of microsatellite variation of guppies (Poecilia reticulata) in Trinidad and Tobago: evidence for a dynamic source-sink metapopulation structure, founder events and population bottlenecks. J. Evol. Biol. 2009, 22:485-497.
2. Becher S A, Russell S T, Magurran A E. Isolation and characterization of polymorphic microsatellites in the Trinidadian guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Mol. Ecol. Notes 2002, 2:456-458.
3. Berg E C, Eadie J M, Langen T A, Russell A F. Reverse sex-biased philopatry in a cooperative bird: genetic consequences and a social cause. Mol. Ecol. 2009, 18:3486-3499.
4. Bilde A, Maklakov A, Shilling N. Inbreeding avoidance in spiders: evidence for rescue effect in fecundity of female spiders with outbreeding opportunity. J. Evol. Biol. 2007, 20:1237-1242.
5. Bretman A, Newcombe D, Tregenza T. Promiscuous females avoid inbreeding by controlling sperm storage. Mol. Ecol. 2009, 18:3340-3345.
6. Charlesworth B. The evolutionary genetics of life-histories. Evolutionary Ecology 1984, 117-133. Shorrocks B. In, ed, Blackwell, Oxford, pp
7. Coltman D W, Pilkington J G, Smith J A, Pemberton J M. Parasite-mediated selection against inbred Soay sheep in a free-living, island population. Evolution 1999, 53:1259-1267.
8. Eakley A L, Houde A E. Possible role of female discrimination against " redundant" males in the evolution of colour pattern polymorphism in guppies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2004, 271:S299-S301.
9. Endler J A, Houde A E. Geographic-variation in female preferences for male traits in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 1995, 49:456-468.
10. Evans J P, Pilastro A, Ramnarine I W. Sperm transfer through forced matings and its evolutionary implications in natural guppy (Poecilia reticulata) populations. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2003, 78:605-612.
11. Evans J P, Brooks R C, Zajitschek S R K, Griffith S C. Does genetic relatedness of mates influence competitive fertilization success in guppies? Evolution 2008, 62:2929-2935.
12. Farr J A. Role of predation in evolution of social-behavior of natural-populations of guppy, Poecilia reticulata (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Evolution 1975, 29:151-158.
13. Farr J A. Male rarity or novelty, female choice behavior, and sexual selection in guppy, Poecilia reticulata Peters (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Evolution 1977, 31:162-168.
14. Farr J A. Social-behavior patterns as determinants of reproductive success in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata Peters (Pisces, Poeciliidae)-an experimental-study of the effects of intermale competition, female choice, and sexual selection. Behaviour 1980, 74:38-91.
15. Fisher R A. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection 1930, Clarendon Press, Oxford
16. Fromhage L, Kokko H, Reid J M. Evolution of mate choice for genome-wide heterozygosity. Evolution 2009, 63:684-694.
17. Frommen J G, Bakker T C M. Inbreeding avoidance through non-random mating in sticklebacks. Biol. Lett. 2006, 2:232-235.
18. Griffiths S W, Magurran A E. Schooling preferences for familiar fish vary with group size in a wild guppy population. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 1997, 264:547-551.
19. Hain T J A, Neff B D. Multiple paternity and kin recognition mechanisms in a guppy population. Mol. Ecol. 2007, 16:3938-3946.
20. Hampton K J, Hughes K A, Houde A E. The allure of the distinctive: reduced sexual responsiveness of female guppies (Poecilia reticulata) to " redundant" male colour patterns. Ethology 2009, 115:475-481.
21. Hoffman J I, Forcada J, Trathan P N, Amos W. Female fur seals show active choice for males that are heterozygous and unrelated. Nature 2007, 445:912-914.
22. Houle D. Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics 1992, 130:195-204.
23. Hughes K A, Du L, Rodd F H, Reznick D N. Familiarity leads to female mate preference for novel males in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Anim. Behav. 1999, 58:907-916.
24. Jarne P, Charlesworth D. The evolution of the selfing rate in functionally hermaphrodite plants and animals. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1993, 24:441-466.
25. Kalinowski S T, Taper M L, Marshall T C. Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol. Ecol. 2007, 16:1099-1106.
26. Kelley J L, Graves J A, Magurran A E. Familiarity breeds contempt in guppies. Nature 1999, 401:661-662.
27. Kelly C D, Godin J G J, Wright J M. Geographical variation in multiple paternity within natural populations of the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 1999, 266:2403-2408.
28. Lewontin R C. Analysis of variance and analysis of causes. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1974, 26:400-411.
29. Lihoreau M, Zimmer C, Rivault C. Kin recognition and incest avoidance in a group-living insect, Behav. Ecology 2007, 18:880-887.
30. Littell R C. Analysis of unbalanced mixed model data: a case study comparison of ANOVA versus REML. J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat. 2002, 7:472-490.
31. Magurran A E. Evolutionary Ecology: The Trinidadian Guppy 2005, Oxford Univ. Press, New York
32. Magurran A E, Nowak M A. Another battle of the sexes-the consequences of sexual asymmetry in mating costs and predation risk in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 1991, 246:31-38.
33. Magurran A E, Seghers B H. Sexual conflict as a consequence of ecology-evidence from guppy, Poecilia reticulata, populations in Trinidad. Proc. R. Lond. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 1994, 255:31-36.
34. Mariette M, Kelley J L, Brooks R, Evans J P. The effects of inbreeding on male courtship behaviour and coloration in guppies. Ethology 2006, 112:807-814.
35. Marshall T C, Slate J, Kruuk L E B, Pemberton J M. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol. Ecol. 1998, 7:639-655.
36. Nakadate M, Shikano T, Taniguchi N. Inbreeding depression and heterosis in various quantitative traits of the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Aquaculture 2003, 220:219-226.
37. Neff B D, Pitcher T E. Mate choice for non-additive genetic benefits: a resolution to the lek paradox. J. Theor. Biol. 2008, 254:147-155.
38. Neff B D, Pitcher T E, Ramnarine I W. Inter-population variation in multiple paternity and reproductive skew in the guppy. Mol. Ecol. 2008, 17:2975-2984.
39. Olendorf R, Reudi B, Hughes K A. Primers for 12 polymorphic microsatellite DNA loci from the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Mol. Ecol. Notes 2004, 4:668-671.
40. van Oosterhout C, Trigg R E, Carvalho G R, Magurran A E, Hauser L, Shaw P W. Inbreeding depression and genetic load of sexually selected traits: how the guppy lost its spots. J. Evol. Biol. 2003, 16:273-281.
41. van Oosterhout C, Smith A M, Haenfling B, Ramnarine I W, Mohammed R S, Cable J. The guppy as a conservation model: implications of parasitism and inbreeding for reintroduction success. Conserv. Biol. 2007, 21:1573-1583.
42. Parker K M, Hughes K, Kim T J, Hedrick P W. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci from the Gila topminnow (Poeciliopsis o. occidentalis) and their utility in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Mol. Ecol. 1998, 7:361-363.
43. Pilastro A, Gasparini C, Boschetto C, Evans J P. Colorful male guppies do not provide females with fecundity benefits. Behav. Ecol. 2008, 19:374-381.
44. Pitcher T E, Rodd F H, Rowe L. Female choice and the relatedness of mates in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Genetica 2008, 134:137-146.
45. Pusey A, Wolf M. Inbreeding avoidance in animals. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1996, 11:201-206.
46. Queller D C, Goodnight K F. Estimating relatedness using genetic-markers. Evolution 1989, 43:258-275.
47. Raymond M, Rousset F. Genepop (version-1.2) - population-genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J. Hered. 1995, 86:248-249.
48. Reusch T B H, Haberli M A, Aeschlimann P B, Milinski M. Female sticklebacks count alleles in a strategy of sexual selection explaining MHC polymorphism. Nature 2001, 414:300-302.
49. Reznick D N, Butler M J, Rodd F H, Ross P. Life-history evolution in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). 6. Differential mortality as a mechanism for natural selection. Evolution 1996, 50:1651-1660.
50. Shaw P W, Carvalho G R, Magurran A E, Seghers B H. Population differentiation in Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia-reticulata)-patterns and problems. J. Fish Biol. 1991, 39:203-209.
51. Shaw P W, Carvalho G R, Magurran A E, Seghers B H. Factors affecting the distribution of genetic-variability in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. J. Fish Biol. 1994, 45:875-888.
52. Sheridan L, Pomiankowski A. Fluctuating asymmetry, spot asymmetry and inbreeding depression in the sexual coloration of male guppy fish. Heredity 1997, 79:515-523.
53. Tregenza T, Wedell T. Polyandrous females avoid costs of inbreeding. Nature 2002, 415:71-73.
54. Viken A, Fleming I A, Rosenqvist G. Premating avoidance of inbreeding absent in female guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Ethology 2006, 112:716-723.
55. Wang J L. Sibship reconstruction from genetic data with typing errors. Genetics 2004, 166:1963-1979.
56. Zajitschek S R K, Brooks R C. Distinguishing the effects of familiarity, relatedness, and color pattern rarity on attractiveness and measuring their effects on sexual selection in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Am. Nat. 2008, 172:843-854.
57. Zajitschek S R K, Evans J P, Brooks R. Independent effects of familiarity and mating preferences for ornamental traits on mating decisions in guppies. Behav. Ecol. 2006, 17:911-916.
58. Zajitschek S R K, Lindholm A K, Evans J P, Brooks R C. Experimental evidence that high levels of inbreeding depress sperm competitiveness. J. Evol. Biol. 2009, 22:1338-1345.