The genomic architecture of sexual dimorphism in the dioecious plant silene latifolia

Evolution

Volumn 64, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 2873-2886

  Delph, Lynda F ^a   Arntz, A Michele ^a   Scotti Saintagne, Caroline ^b   Scotti, Ivan ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

Artificial selection; Genetic correlations; Linkage map; Sex specific expression; Sexual conflict

Indexed keywords

DIOECY; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENOME; HERB; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; SELECTION; SEX-RELATED DIFFERENCE; SEXUAL CONFLICT; SEXUAL DIMORPHISM; TRADE-OFF;

ARTICLE; EVOLUTION; FLOWER; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GENOME; HISTOLOGY; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT LEAF; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; SILENE;

BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; FLOWERS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME; PHENOTYPE; PLANT LEAVES; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; SELECTION, GENETIC; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SILENE;

SILENE LATIFOLIA;

EID: 78649247460     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01048.x     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Arntz, A. M., and L. F. Delph. 2001. Pattern and process: evidence for the evolution of photosynthetic traits in natural populations. Oecologia 127:455-467.
2. Baker, H. G. 1948. Stages in invasion and replacement demonstrated by species of Melandrium. J. Ecol. 36:96-119.
3. Beavis, W. D. 1994. The power and deceit of QTL experiments: lessons from comparative QTL studies. Pp. 250-266 in D. B. Wilkinson, ed., Proceedings of the Forty-Ninth Annual Corn and Sorghum Industry Research Conference. American Seed Trade Association, Chicago, IL.
4. Blackburn, K. B. 1923. Sex chromosomes in plants. Nature 112:687-688.
5. Bonduriansky, R., and S. F. Chenoweth. 2009. Intralocus sexual conflict. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24:280-288.
6. Caruso,C.M., H. Maherali, A. Mikulyuk, K. Carlson, and R.B. Jackson. 2005. Genetic variance and covariance for physiological traits in Lobelia: are there constraints on adaptive evolution? Evolution 59:826-837.
7. Chenoweth, S. F., H. D. Rundle, and M. W. Blows. 2008. Genetic constraints and the evolution of display trait sexual dimorphism by natural and sexual selection. Am. Nat. 171:22-34.
8. Cheverud, J. M., and E. Routman. 1993. Quantitative trait loci: individual gene effects on quantitative characters. J. Evol. Biol. 6:463-480.
9. Delcourt, M., M. W. Blows, and H. D. Rundle. 2009. Sexually antagonistic genetic variance for fitness in an ancestral and a novel environment. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 276:2009-2014.
10. Delph, L. F. 2007. The genetic integration of sexually dimorphic traits in the dioecious plant, Silene latifolia. Pp. 115-123 in D. J. Fairbairn, W. U. Blanckenhorn and T. Székely, eds., Sex, size and gender roles. Evolutionary studies of sexual size dimorphism. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
11. Delph, L. F., and D. Bell. 2008. A test of the differential-plasticity hypothesis for variation in the degree of sexual dimorphism in Silene latifolia. Evol. Ecol. Res. 10:61-75.
12. Delph, L. F., F. N. Knapczyk, and D. R. Taylor. 2002. Among-population variation and correlations in sexually dimorphic traits of Silene latifolia. J. Evol. Biol. 15:1011-1020.
13. Delph, L. F., F. M. Frey, J. C. Steven, and J. L. Gehring. 2004a. Investigating the independent evolution of the size of floral parts via G-matrix estimation and artificial selection. Evol. Dev. 6:438-448.
14. Delph, L. F., J. L. Gehring, F. M. Frey, A. M. Arntz, and M. Levri. 2004b. Genetic constraints on floral evolution in a sexually dimorphic plant revealed by artificial selection. Evolution 58:1936-1946.
15. Delph, L. F., J. L. Gehring, A. M. Arntz, M. Levri, and F. M. Frey. 2005. Genetic correlations with floral display lead to sexual dimorphism in the cost of reproduction. Am. Nat. 166:S31-S41.
16. Fairbairn, D. J., W. U. Blanckenhorn, and T. Székely. 2007. Sex, size, and gender roles. Evolutionary studies of sexual size dimorphism. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
17. Gardner, K. M., and R. G. Latta. 2007. Shared quantitative trait loci underlying the genetic correlation between continuous traits. Mol. Ecol. 16:4195-4209.
18. Geber, M. A., T. E. Dawson, and L. F. Delph. 1999. Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
19. Gurganus,M. C., S. V. Nuzhdin, J.W. Leips, and T. F. C. Mackay. 1999. Highresolution mapping of quantitative trait loci for sternopleural bristle number in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 152:1585-1604.
20. Herlihy, C., and L. F. Delph. 2009. Differential response of floral attractiveness and gametophyte production to stress in flower-size selection lines of Silene latifolia (Caryophyllaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 170:1103-1108.
21. Jürgens, A., T. Witt, and G. Gottsberger. 1996. Reproduction and pollination in central European populations of Silene and Saponaria species. Bot. Acta 109:316-324.
22. Kelly, J. K. 2009. Connecting QTLs to the G-matrix of evolutionary quantitative genetics. Evolution 63:813-825.
23. Lande, R. 1980. Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in polygenic characters. Evolution 34:292-305.
24. Lande, R. 1987. Genetic correlations between the sexes in the evolution of sexual dimorphism andmating preferences. Pp. 83-94 in J.W. Bradbury, and M. B. Andersson, eds., Sexual selection: testing the alternatives. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
25. Lardon, A., S. Georgiev, A. Aghmir, G. Le Merrer, and I. Negrutiu. 1999. Sexual dimorphism in white campion: complex control of carpel number is revealed by Y chromosome deletions. Genetics 151:1173-1185.
26. Laurie, C. C., S. D. Chasalow, J. R. LeDeaux, R. McCarroll, D. Bush, B. Hauge, C. Lai, D. Clark, T. R. Rocheford, and J. W. Dudley. 2004. The genetic architecture of response to long-term artificial selection for oil concentration in the maize kernel. Genetics 168:2141-2155.
27. Lebel-Hardenack, S., E. Hauser, T. F. Law, J. Schmid, and S. R. Grant. 2002. Mapping of sex determination loci on the white campion (Silene latifolia) Y chromosome using amplified fragment length polymorphism. Genetics 160:717-725.
28. Lin, Y.-R., K. F. Scherzt, and A. H. Paterson. 1995. Comparative analysis of QTLs affecting plant height andmaturity across the Poaceae, in reference to an interspecific Sorghum population. Genetics 141:391-411.
29. Lovich, J. E., and J.W. Gibbons. 1992. A review of techniques for quantifying sexual size dimorphism. Growth Devel. Ageing 56:269-281.
30. Lynch, M., and B. Walsh. 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
31. McNeill, J. 1978. The biology of Canadian weeds, 25. Silene alba (Miller) Krause. Can. J. Plant Sci. 57:1103-1114.
32. Meagher, T. R. 1994. The quantitative genetics of sexual dimorphism in Silene latifolia (Caryophyllaceae). II. Response to sex-specific selection. Evolution 48:939-951.
33. Nachman, M. W. 2002. Variation in recombination rate across the genome: evidence and implications. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 12:657-663.
34. Nuzhdin, S. V., E. G. Pasyukova, C. L. Dilda, Z. B. Zeng, and T. F. C. Mackay. 1997. Sex-specific quantitative trait loci affecting longevity in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:9734-9739.
35. Poissant, J., A. J. Wilson, and D. W. Coltman. 2010. Sex-specific genetic variance and the evolution of sexual dimorphism: a systematic review of cross-sex genetic correlations. Evolution 64:97-107.
36. Preziosi, R. F., and D. J. Fairbairn. 1996. Sexual size dimorphism and selection in the wild in the waterstrider Aquarius remigis: body size, components of body size and male mating success. J. Evol. Biol. 9:317-336.
37. Price, T. D. 1984. The evolution of sexual dimorphism in Darwin's finches. Am. Nat. 123:500-518.
38. Rice,W. R. 1984. Sex chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38:735-742.
39. Rice, W. R., and A. K. Chippindale. 2002. The evolution of hybrid infertility: perpetual coevolution between gender-specific and sexually antagonistic genes. Genetica 116:179-188.
40. Saintagne, C., C. Bodénès, T. Barreneche, D. Pot, C. Plomion, and A. Kremer. 2004. Distribution of genomic regions differentiating oak species assessed by QTL detection. Heredity 92:20-30.
41. Scotti, I., and L. F. Delph. 2006. Selective trade-offs and sex-chromosome evolution in Silene latifolia. Evolution 60:1793-1800.
42. Steven, J. C., L. F. Delph, and E. D. Brodie III. 2007. Sexual dimorphism in the quantitative-genetic architecture of floral, leaf, and allocation traits in Silene latifolia. Evolution 61:42-57.
43. Westergaard, M. 1948. The relation between chromosome constitution and sex in the offspring of triploid Melandrium. Hereditas 34:255-279.
44. Young, H. J. 2002. Diurnal and nocturnal pollination of Silene latifolia (Caryophyllaceae). Am. J. Bot. 89:433-440.