Supporting virtual collaborative learning using collaboration scripts and content schemes

Techniques for Fostering Collaboration in Online Learning Communities: Theoretical and Practical Perspectives

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 15-32

  Kopp, Birgitta ^a   Mandl, Heinz ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 81755167201     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-61692-898-8.ch002     Document Type: Chapter

References (80)

1. Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In Pearson, P. D. (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 255-291). New York: Longman.
2. Andriessen, J., Baker, M., & Suthers, D. (2003). Argumentation, computer support, and the educational context of confronting cognition. In Andriessen, J., Baker, M., & Suthers, D. (Eds.), Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computersupported collaborative learning environments (pp. 1-25). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
3. Aronson, E., Blaney, N., Stephan, C., Sikes, J., & Snapp, M. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
4. Baker, M., & Lund, K. (1997). Prompting reflective interactions in a CSCL environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 13(3), 175-193. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2729.1997.00019.x
5. Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: An experimental and social study. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6. Brewer, W. F., & Nakamura, G. V. (1984). The nature and functions of schemas. Center for the Study of Reading, Technical Report Bo. 325. In Wyer, R. S., & Krull, T. K. (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 119-160). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Brooks, L. W., & Dansereau, D. F. (1983). Effects of structural schema training and text organization on expository prose processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(6), 811-820. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.75.6.811
8. Butera, F., & Buchs, C. (2005). Reasoning together: From focusing to decentering. In Girotto, V., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (Eds.), The shape of reason (pp. 193-203). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
9. Clark, H. H., & Carlson, T. B. (1982). Speech acts and hearer's beliefs. In Smith, N. V. (Ed.), Mutual knowledge (pp. 1-36). New York, NY: Academic Press.
10. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (2000). Adventures in anchored instruction: Lessons from beyond the ivory tower. In Glaser, R. (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology: Educational design and cognitive science (pp. 35-99). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1-35.
12. Dansereau, D. F. (1988). Cooperative learning strategies. In Weinstein, C. E., Goetz, E. T., & Alexander, P. A. (Eds.), Learning and study strategies: Issues in assessment, instruction, and evaluation (pp. 103-120). New York: Academic Press.
13. De Corte, E. (2003). Designing learning environments. In Verschaffel, L., Entwistle, N., & Merrienboer, J. J. G. v. (Eds.), Powerful learning environments: Unravelling basic components and dimensions (pp. 21-33). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Pergamon.
14. De Jong, T., & Ferguson-Hessler, M. G. M. (1996). Types and qualities of knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 31(2), 105-113. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3102_2
15. Dennis, A. R., & Valacich, J. S. (1999). Rethinking media richness: towards a theory of media synchronicity. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences (pp. 1-10). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Press
16. Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by 'collaborative learning. In Dillenbourg, P. (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1-19). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
17. Doise, W., & Mugny, G. (1984). Social Processes in Children's Learning. Cambridge, UK: University Press.
18. Dweck, C. S., & Elliot, E. S. (1983). Achievement motivation. In Mussen, P., & Hetherington, E. M. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (pp. 643-691). New York: Wiley.
19. Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. (2001). A 2x2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501-519. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.501
20. Ellis, C. A., Gibbs, S. J., & Rein, G. L. (1991). Groupware: Some issues and experiences. Communications of the ACM, 34(1), 35-58. doi:10.1145/99977.99987
21. Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2006). Conceptual and socio-cognitive support for collaborative learning in videoconferencing environ-ments. Computers & Education, 47(3), 298-315. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2004.11.001
22. Ertl, B., Kopp, B., & Mandl, H. (2007). Supporting collaborative learning in videoconferencing using collaboration scripts and content schemes. In Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Mandl, H., & Haake, J. M. (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported communication of knowledge - cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (pp. 213-236). Berlin Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
23. Ertl, B., Reiserer, M., & Mandl, H. (2002). Kooperatives Lernen in Videokonferenzen. Unter-richstwissenschaft, 30(4), 339-356.
24. Fischer, F., Bruhn, J., Gräsel, C., & Mandl, H. (2000). Kooperatives Lernen mit Videokonferenzen: Gemeinsame Wissenskonstruktion und individueller Lernerfolg. Kognitionswissenschaft, 9(1), 5-16. doi:10.1007/s001970000028
25. Fischer, F., Bruhn, J., Gräsel, C., & Mandl, H. (2002). Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools. Learning and Instruction, 12(2), 213-232. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00005-6
26. Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Mandl, H., & Haake, J. M. (2007). Scripting computer-supported communication of knowledge-Cognitive, computational, and educational perspectives. New York: Springer.
27. Friedman, L. B., & McCullough, J. (1992). Computer conferencing as a support mechanism for teacher-researches in rural high school. In Waggoner, M. D. (Ed.), Empowerment networks: Computer conferencing in education (pp. 139-156). Englwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
28. Gunawardena, D. N., & Zittle, F. (1997). Social presence as predictor of satisfaction within a computer mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8-25. doi:10.1080/08923649709526970
29. Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Pintrich, P. R., & Elliot, A. J., Thrash, Tm. M. (2002). Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and Illuminating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 638-645. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.638
30. Härder, J. (2003). Wissenskommunikation mit Desktop-Videokonferenzsystemen: Strukturier-ungsangebote für den Wissensaustausch und gemeinsame Inferenzen. Unpublished dissertation, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität, Freiburg, Germany.
31. Hertz-Lazarowitz, R., Kirkus, V. B., & Miller, N. (1992). Implications of current research on cooperative interaction for classroom application. In Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (Ed.), Interaction in cooperative groups: The theoretical anatomy of group learning (pp. 253-280). New York: Cambridge University Press.
32. Hinsz, V. B., Tindale, R. S., & Vollrath, D. A. (1997). The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psychological Bulletin, 121(1), 43-64. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.43
33. Hollingshead, A. B. (1996). Information suppression and status persistence in group decision making. The effects of communication media. Human Communication Research, 23(2), 193-219. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1996.tb00392.x
34. Hron, A., Hesse, F.-W., Reinhard, P., & Picard, E. (1997). Strukturierte Kooperation beim com-puterunterstützten kollaborativen Lernen. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 25(1), 56-69.
35. Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63-85. doi:10.1007/BF02300500
36. Kerr, N. L., & Bruun, S. (1983). The dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free rider effects. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(1), 78-94. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.78
37. King, A. (2007). Scripting collaborative learning processes: a cognitive perspective. In Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Mandl, H., & Haake, J. M. (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported communication of knowledge - cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (pp. 13-37). Berlin Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
38. Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Hesse, F. W. (2006). Collaboration scripts - A conceptual analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 18(2), 159-185. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9007-2
39. Kolodner, J. L. (2007). The roles of scripts in promoting collaborative discourse in learning by design. In Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Mandl, H., & Haake, J. M. (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported communication of knowledge - cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (pp. 237-262). Berlin Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
40. Kopp, B., Ertl, B., & Mandl, H. (2006). Wissens-schema und Skript - Förderung der Anwendung von Theoriewissen auf die Aufgabenbearbeitung in Videokonferenzen. Zeitschrift für Entwicklung-spsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 38(3), 132-138. doi:10.1026/0049-8637.38.3.132
41. Kopp, B., & Mandl, H. (2006). Gemeinsame Wissenskonstruktion. In Bierhoff, H.-W., & Frey, D. (Eds.), Handbuch der Sozialpsychologie und Kommunikationspsychologie (pp. 504-509). Göt-tingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
42. Kopp, B., & Mandl, H. (2007). Fostering Argumentation with Script and Content Scheme in Videoconferencing. In: C. Chinn, G. Erkens, & S. Puntambekar (Eds.), Proceedings of Mice, Minds and Society - The Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, 8 (pp. 382-392), New Jersey: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
43. Kopp, B., & Mandl, H. (2008). Collaborative online learning: A heterogeneous phenomenon. Paper presented at the Conference on Knowledge Construction in E-Learning Context. (pp. 23-29). Aachen University: Sun SITE Central Europe, RWTH. Retrieved April, 13, 2010, from http://ftp.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Publications/CEUR-WS/Vol-398/S1_KoppEtAl.pdf
44. Kopp, B., Schnurer, K., & Mandl, H. (2009). Collaborative learning in virtual seminars: Analyzing learning processes and learning outcomes. In C. O'Malley, D. Suthers, P. Reimann & A. Dimitra-copoulou (Eds.), Proceedings of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Practices - CSCL 2009 Conference. (pp. 151-160). New Jersey: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
45. Krauss, R. M., & Fussell, S. R. (1990). Mutual knowledge and communicative effectiveness. In Galegher, J., Kraut, R. E., & Egido, C. (Eds.), Intellectual teamwork: Social and technological foundations of cooperative work (pp. 111-145). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
46. Kreijins, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(3), 335-353. doi:10.1016/ S0747-5632(02)00057-2
47. Lambiotte, J. G., Skaggs, L. P., & Dansereau, D. F. (1993). Learning from lectures: effects of knowl-edge maps and cooperative review strategies. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 7(6), 483-497. doi:10.1002/acp.2350070604
48. Latané, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Per-sonality and Social Psychology, 37(6), 822-832. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.6.822
49. Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., Spence, J. C., Poulsen, C., Chambers, B., & d'Apollonia, S. (1996). Within-Class Grouping: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 423-458.
50. McGrath, J. E. (1990). Time matters in groups. In Galegher, J., Kraut, R. E., & Egido, C. (Eds.), Intellectual teamwork: Social and technological foundations of cooperative work (pp. 23-61). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
51. Moreland, R. L. (2000). Transactive memory: learning who knows what in work groups and organizations. In Thompson, L., Messik, D., & Levine, J. (Eds.), Shared Cognition in Organizations: The Management of Knowledge (pp. 3-31). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
52. Moscovici, S. (1980). Toward a theory of conversion behavior. In L. Berkowitz /Ed.) [New York: Academic Press]. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 209-239. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60133-1
53. Nemeth, C. J. (1986). Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychological Review, 93(11), 23-32. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.93.1.23
54. O'Donnell, A. M., & Dansereau, D. F. (2000). Interactive effects of prior knowledge and ma-terial format on cooperative teaching. Journal of Experimental Education, 68(2), 101-118. doi:10.1080/00220970009598497
55. O'Donnell, A. M., & King, A. (Eds.). (1999). Cognitive perspectives on peer learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
56. Paechter, M. (2003). Wissenskommunikation, Kooperation und Lernen in virtuellen Gruppen. Lengerich. Germany: Pabst Publisher.
57. Quiamzade, A., & Mugny, G. (2001). Social influence dynamics in aptitude tasks. Social Psychology of Education, 4, 311-334. doi:10.1023/A:1011388821962
58. Reiserer, M. (2002). Peer-Teaching in Videokonferenzen. Effekte niedrig- und hochstrukturierter Kooperationsskripte auf Lernprozess und Lernerfolg. Unpublished Dissertation, Ludwig-Maximil-ians-Universität München, München, Germany.
59. Reiserer, M., Ertl, B., & Mandl, H. (2002). Fostering collaborative knowledge construction in desktop videoconferencing. Effects of content schemes and cooperation scripts in peer-teaching settings. In Stahl, G. (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community - CSCL 2002 (pp. 379-388). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
60. Rummel, N., Ertl, B., Härder, J., & Spada, H. (2003). Supporting collaborative learning and problem-solving in desktop-videoconferencing settings. International Journal of Educational Policy, Research, and Practice, 4(1), 83-115.
61. Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2005). Learning to collaborate: An instructional approach to promoting collaborative problem solving in computer-mediated settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 201-241. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1402_2
62. Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2007). Can people learn computer-mediated collaboration by following a script? In Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Mandl, H., & Haake, J. M. (Eds.), Scripting Computer--Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 39-55). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-36949-5_3
63. Salomon, G. (1992). Effects with and of computers and the study of computer-based learning environments. In De Corte, E., Linn, M. C., Mandl, H., & Verschaffel, L. (Eds.), Computer-based learning environments and problem solving (pp. 249-263). Berlin Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
64. Salomon, G., & Globerson, T. (1989). When teams do not function the way they ought to. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 89-99. doi:10.1016/0883-0355(89)90018-9
65. Salomon, G., & Perkins, D. N. (1998). Individual and social aspects of learning. Review of Research in Education, 23(1), 1-24. doi:10.3102/0091732X023001001
66. Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
67. Schwarz, B. B., Neuman, Y., & Biezuner, S. (2000). Two wrongs may make a right: If they argue together! Cognition and Instruction, 18(4), 461-494. doi:10.1207/S1532690XCI1804_2
68. Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(6), 1467-1478. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.6.1467
69. Stegmann, K. (2008). Argumentative Knowledge Construction. Analysing and Facilitating Discursive Processes, Cognitive Processes, and Knowledge Acquisition During Collaborative Argumentation in Online Discussions. Dissertation, Ludwig-Maximilians-University.
70. Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2004). Scripting argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported learning environments. In Proceedings of the EARLI SIG 2004. (pp. 320-330). Retrieved April, 13, 2010, from http://www.iwm-kmrc.de/workshops/SIM2004/?go=prog
71. Suthers, D. (2001). Towards a systematic study of representational guidance for collaborative learning discourse. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 7(3), 254-277.
72. Suthers, D., & Hundhausen, C. D. (2001). Learning by constructing collaborative representations: An empirical comparison of three alternatives. In P. Dillenbourg, A. Eurelings, & K. Hakkarainen (Eds.), Proceedings of the First European Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (euroCSCL) (pp. 577-584). Maastricht, The Netherlands: McLuhan Institute.
73. Tomasetto, C., Mucchi-Faina, A., Alparone, F. R., & Pagliaro, S. (2009). Differential effects of majority and minority influence on argumentation strategies. Social Influence, 4(1), 33-45. doi:10.1080/15534510802257510
74. Van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., & Henkemans, F. S. (1996). Fundamentals of argumentation theory - A handbook of historical backgrounds and contemporary developments. Mahawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
75. Wegner, D. M., Giuliano, T., & Hertel, P. T. (1985). Cognitive interdependence in close relationships. In Ickes, W. J. (Ed.), Compatible and incompatible relationships (pp. 253-276). New York: Springer.
76. Weinberger, A. (2003). Scripts for computersupported collaborative learning. Dissertation, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Germany. Retrieved April, 13, 2010 from http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/19/01/71/PDF/Weinberger_2003.pdf
77. Weinberger, A., Reiserer, M., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2003). Facilitating collaborative knowledge construction in computer-mediated learning with structuring tools. In Bromme, R., Hesse, F., & Spada, H. (Eds.), Barriers and biases in net based communication. Norwell: Kluwer.
78. Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2007). Scripting argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported learning environments. In Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Mandl, H., & Haake, J. M. (Eds.), Scripting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 191-211). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-36949-5_12
79. Wittenbaum, G. M., & Stasser, G. (1996). Management of information in small groups. In Nye, J. L., & Brower, A. M. (Eds.), What's social about social cognition? Research on socially shared cognition in small groups (pp. 3-28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
80. Zhang, J., & Norman, D. A. (1994). Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. Cognitive Science, 18(1), 87-122. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1801_3