"Wisdom of crowds" ? A decentralised election forecasting model that uses citizens' local expectations

Electoral Studies

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 771-783

  Murr, Andreas Erwin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

British election; Citizen forecasting; Election forecasting; Expectations model; Wisdom of crowds

Indexed keywords

DECENTRALIZATION; ELECTION; ELECTORAL GEOGRAPHY; FORECASTING METHOD; MODEL; PARTY POLITICS; POLITICAL RELATIONS; VOTING BEHAVIOR;

UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 81555197019     PISSN: 02613794     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2011.07.005     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Asch S.E. Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American 1955, 193:33-35.
2. Bélanger é, Lewis-Beck M.S., Nadeau R. A political economy forecast for the 2005 British general election. British Journal of Politics & International Relations 2005, 7:191-198.
3. National election results 2010 2010, BBC, Available at:. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/election2010/results/.
4. Blais A., Carty R.K. Does proportional representation foster voter turnout?. European Journal of Political Research 1990, 18:167-181.
5. Blais A., Gidengil E., Fournier P., Nevitte N., Hicks B.M. Measuring expectations: comparing alternative approaches. Electoral Studies 2008, 27:337-343.
6. Boland P.J. Majority systems and the Condorcet jury theorem. The Statistician 1989, 38:181-189.
7. Borisyuk R., Galina B., Rallings C., Thrasher M. Forecasting the 2005 general election: a neural network approach. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations 2005, 7:199-209.
8. Before the Vote: Forecasting American National Elections 2000, Sage, Thousand Oaks. J.E. Campbell, J.C. Garand (Eds.).
9. Chamley C. Rational Herds: Economic Models of Social Learning 2004, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
10. Condorcet Marquis de, M.J.A.N.d.C Essai sur l'application de l'analyse a la probabilité des descisions redues a la pluralité de voix 1785, De l'Imprimerie Royale, Paris.
11. Condorcet Marquis de, M.J.A.N.d.C. Essay on the application of probability analyses to decisions returned by a plurality of people. Condorcet: Foundations of Social Choice and Political Theory 1994, 11-36. E. Elgar, Aldershot, (Original work published 1785). I. McLean, F. Hewitt (Eds.).
12. Converse P.E. The nature of belief systems in mass politics. Ideology and Discontent 1964, 206-261. Free Press of Glencoe, London. D.E. Apter (Ed.).
13. Converse P.E. Popular representation and the distribution of information. Information and Democratic Processes 1990, 369-388. University of Illinois Press, Urbana and Chicago. J.A. Ferejohn, J.H. Kuklinski (Eds.).
14. Craft T. Proportional election maps, without Flash. 2010, Available at:. http://timcraft.com/2010/05/09/electionmap.
15. Curtice J., Firth D. Exit polling in a cold climate: the BBC-ITV experience in Britain in 2005. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 2008, 171:509-539.
16. Estlund D.M. Opinion leaders, independence, and Condorcet's jury theorem. Theory and Decision 1994, 36:131-162.
17. Fischhoff B., MacGregor D. Subjective confidence in forecasts. Journal of Forecasting 1982, 1:155-172.
18. Galton F. Vox populi. Nature 1907, 75:450-451.
19. Gelman A., Hill J. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models 2009, Cambridge University Press.
20. Gower J.C. A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics 1971, 27:857-871.
21. Grofman B., Owen G., Feld S.L. Thirteen theorems in search of the truth. Theory and Decision 1983, 15:261-278.
22. 't Hart P. Groupthink in Government: A Study of Small Groups and Policy Failure 1994, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
23. Hastie R., Kameda T. The robust beauty of majority rules in group decisions. Psychological Review 2005, 112:494-508.
24. Hogarth R.M. A note on aggregating opinions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 1978, 21:40-46.
25. Imai K., King G., Lau O. Zelig: Everyone's Statistical Software 2008, Available at:. http://gking.harvard.edu/zelig.
26. Janis I.L. Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes 1982, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
27. Jehn K.A., Northcraft G.B., Neale M.A. Why differences make a difference: a field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly 1999, 44:741-763.
28. King G., Tomz M., Wittenberg J. Making the most of statistical analyses: improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science 2000, 44:341-355.
29. Koriat A., Lichtenstein S., Fischhoff B. Reasons for confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 1980, 6:107-118.
30. Ladha K.K. The Condorcet jury theorem, free speech, and correlated votes. American Journal of Political Science 1992, 36:617-634.
31. Larrick R.P., Soll J.B. Intuitions about combining opinions: misappreciation of the averaging principle. Management Science 2006, 52:111-127.
32. Lewis-Beck M.S. Election forecasting: principles and practice. British Journal of Politics & International Relations 2005, 7:145-164.
33. Lewis-Beck M.S., Skalaban A. Citizen forecasting: can voters see into the future?. British Journal of Political Science 1989, 19:146-153.
34. Lewis-Beck, M.S., Stegmaier, M., 2011. Citizen forecasting: Can UK voters see the future? Electoral Studies 30, 264-268.
35. Lewis-Beck M.S., Tien C. Voters as forecasters: a micromodel of election prediction. International Journal of Forecasting 1999, 15:175-184.
36. List C., Goodin R.E. Epistemic democracy: generalizing the Condorcet jury theorem. Journal of Political Philosophy 2001, 9:277-306.
37. Long Jusko K., Shively W.P. Applying a two-step strategy to the analysis of cross-national public opinion data. Political Analysis 2005, 13:327-344.
38. Luskin R. Explaining political sophistication. Political Behavior 1990, 12:331-361.
39. Meehl P.E. When shall we use our heads instead of the formula?. Journal of Counseling Psychology 1957, 4:268-273.
40. Miller N.R. Information, electorates, and democracy: some extensions and interpretations of the Condorcet jury theorem. Information Pooling and Group Decision Making 1986, 173-192. JAI Press, Greenwich. B. Grofman, G. Owen (Eds.).
41. Mueller D.C. Public Choice II 1989, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
42. Mughan A. General election forecasting in Britain: a comparison of three simple models. Electoral Studies 1987, 6:195-207.
43. Norpoth H. Forecasting British elections: a dynamic perspective. Electoral Studies 2004, 23:297-305.
44. Page B.I., Shapiro R.Y. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences 1992, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
45. Media Guide to the New Parliamentary Constituencies. LGC Elections Centre for BBC, ITN, PA 2007, News and Sky, Plymouth. C. Rallings, M. Thrasher (Eds.).
46. Rossiter D.J., Johnston R.J., Pattie C.J. The Boundary Commissions: Redrawing the UK's Map of Parliamentary Constituencies 1999, Manchester University, Manchester.
47. Sanders D. Government popularity and the next general election. The Political Quarterly 1991, 62:235-261.
48. Sanders D. Popularity function forecasts for the 2005 UK general election. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations 2005, 7:174-190.
49. Shannon C.E., Weaver W. The Mathematical Theory of Communication 1949, University of Illinois Press, Urbana and Chicago.
50. Smith W.D. Range voting 2000, Available at:. http://math.temple.edu/wds/homepage/rangevote.pdf.
51. Surowiecki J. The Wisdom of Crowds. Abacus, London 2004.
52. Tufte E.R. The relationship between seats and votes in two-party systems. The American Political Science Review 1973, 67:540-554.
53. von Hayek F.A. The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review 1945, 35:519-530.
54. Whiteley P.F. Electoral forecasting from poll data: the British case. British Journal of Political Science 1979, 9:219-236.
55. Whiteley P.F. Forecasting seats from votes in British general elections. British Journal of Politics & International Relations 2005, 7:165-173.
56. Whiteley P.F. Evaluating rival forecasting models of the 2005 general election in Britain: an encompassing experiment. Electoral Studies 2008, 27:581-588.
57. Whiteley, P.F., Sanders, D., Stewart, M., Clarke, H., 2011. Aggregate level forecasting of the 2010 general election in Britain: The seats-votes model. Electoral Studies 30, 278-283.