Factors behind organizational learning from benchmarking: Experiences from Norwegian municipal benchmarking networks

Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 297-320

  Askim, Jostein ^a   Johnsen, Age ^b   Christophersen, Knut Andreas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^b OSLO METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 40849135776     PISSN: 10531858     EISSN: 14779803     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mum012     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Agranoff, Robert, and Michael McGuire. 2001. The big questions of public network management research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 11:295-326.
2. Ammons, David N., Charles Coe, and Michael Lombarde. 2001. Performance-comparison projects in local government: Participants' perspectives. Public Administration Review 61:100-15.
3. Askim, Jostein. 2004. Benchmarking in local government service delivery: Window-dressing or a potent driver for improvement? Evidence from Norway. In Leistungsmessung und - vergleich in Politik und Verwaltung, ed. S. Kuhlmann, J. Bogumil, and H. Wollmann, 277-302. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag.
4. Baldersheim, Harald, and Jean-Pascal Daloz. 2002. Comparing France and Norway: Why? How? Towards a contextual analysis. In Political leadership in a global age: The experiences of France and Norway, ed. H. Baldersheim, and J. P. Daloz, 1-16. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
5. Barzelay, Michael. Forthcoming. Learning from second-hand experience: Case study methodology for extrapolation-oriented research. Governance.
6. Behn, Robert D. 2003. Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures. Public Administration Review 63:588-606.
7. Berry, Frances S. 1994. Innovation in public management: The adoption of strategic planning. Public Administration Review 54:322-30.
8. Bogt, Henk J. ter. 2003. Performance evaluation styles in governmental organizations: How do professional managers facilitate politicians' work? Management Accounting Research 14:311-32.
9. Bouckaert, Geert. 1996. Measurement of public sector performance: Some European perspectives. In Organizational performance and management in the public sector, ed. A. Halachmi and G. Bouchaert, 223-37. London: Quorum Books.
10. Bretschneider, Stuart, Wilpen L. Gorr, Gloria Grizzle, and Earle Klay. 1989. Political and organizational influences on the accuracy of forecasting state government revenues. International Journal of Forecasting 5:307-19.
11. Brundney, Jeff, Sergio Fernandez, Jay Eungha Ryu, and Deil S. Wright. 2005. Exploring and explaining contracting out: Patterns among the American states. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15:393-419.
12. Brunsson, Nils. 1989. The organization of hypocrisy. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons.
13. Camp, Robert C. 1989. Benchmarking: The search for industry best practices that lead to superior performance. Milwaukee, WI: ASQC Quality Press.
14. _. 1995. Business process benchmarking. Milwaukee, WI: ASQC Quality Press.
15. Carson, Paula P., Patricia A. Lanier, Kerry D. Carson, and Brandi N. Guidry. 2000. Clearing a path through the management fashion jungle: Some preliminary trailblazing. Academy of Management Journal 43:1143-58.
16. Cohen, Wesley M., and Daniel A. Levinthal. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35:128-52.
17. Dekker, Sander, and Dan Hansen. 2004. Learning under pressure: The effects of politicization on organizational learning in public bureaucracies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14:211-30.
18. Downs, Anthony. 1957. An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper Collins.
19. Fedor, Donald B., Charles K. Parsons, and Christina E. Shalley. 1996. Organizational comparison processes: Investigating the adoption and impact of benchmarking-related activities. Journal of Quality Management 1:161-92.
20. Feldman, Martha S., and James G. March. 1981. Information in organizations as signal and symbol. Administrative Science Quarterly 26:171-86.
21. Fiol, C. Marlene, and Marjorie A. Lyles. 1985. Organizational learning. Academy of Management Review 19:803-13.
22. FoIz, David F. 2004. Service quality and benchmarking the performance of municipal services. Public Administration Review 64:209-20.
23. Greve, Henrich R. 2003. Organizational learning from performance feedback: A behavioral perspective on innovation and change. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
24. Granlie, Tore. 1998. Dremmen om en konkurransetilpasset stat. Ytre fristilling som styringspolitisk redskap, 1945-1995. In Ein stat? Fristillingas fire ansikt, ed. T. Granlie and P. Selle, 66-106. Oslo, Norway: Samlaget.
25. Hartley, Jean, and Maria Allison. 2002. Good, better, best? Inter-organizational learning in a network of local authorities. Public Management Review 4:101-18.
26. Helden, G. Jan van, and Åge Johnsen. 2002. A comparative analysis of the development of performance-based management systems in Dutch and Norwegian local government. International Public Management Journal 5:75-95.
27. Hood, Christopher. 1995. The new public management in the 1980s: Variations on a theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society 20:93-109.
28. Hox, Joop. 2002. Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. Huber, George P. 1991. Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science 2:88-115.
30. Jacobsen, Dag I. 2006. The relationship between politics and administration: The importance of contingency factors, formal structure, demography, and time. Governance 19:303-23.
31. Johansson, Staffan. 1995. Verksamhetsbedömming i mjuka organisasjoner. Om kommunala ledares verksamhetsinformation och forsök att finna mått på effektivitet inom social service. [Performance assessment in soft organisations]. Stockholm, Sweden: CEFOS.
32. Johnsen, Åge. 1999. Performance measurement in local government: Organisational control in political institutions. PhD thesis, Bergen: Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration.
33. _. 2005. What does 25 years of experience tell us about the state of performance measurement in public management and policy? Public Money and Management 25:9-17.
34. Kaplan, Robert S., and David P. Norton. 1996. The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
35. Levitt, Barbara, and James G. March. 1988. Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology 14:319-40.
36. Macintosh, Norman B. 1985. The social software of accounting and information systems. London: John Wiley and Sons.
37. _. 1994. Management accounting and control systems. New York: Chichester.
38. Mausolff, Christopher. 1999. Organizational learning in response to performance monitoring: A study of four employment programs. PhD diss., Univ. Pittsburgh.
39. Mayston, David J. 1985. Non-profit performance indicators in the public sector. Financial Accountability and Management 1:51-74.
40. Meyer, John W., and Brian Rowan. 1977. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83:340-63.
41. Moynihan, Donald P. 2005a. Goal-based learning and the future of performance management. Public Administration Review 65:203-16.
42. _. 2005b. Why and how do state governments adopt and implement "Managing for Results" reforms? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15:219-43.
43. Nicholson-Crotty, Sean, Nick A. Theobald, and Jill Nicholson-Crotty. 2006. Disparate measures: Public managers and performance-measurement strategies. Public Administration Review 66:101-13.
44. Pollitt, Christopher. 2006. Performance information for democracy-the missing link? Evaluation 12:38-55.
45. Pollitt, Christopher, and Geert Bouckaert. 2004. Public management reform: A comparative analysis, 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press.
46. Simon, Herbert A. 1937. Comparative statistics and the measurement of efficiency. National Municipal Review 26:524-27.
47. Sørensen, Rune, and Ann-Helén Bay. 2002. Competitive tendering in the welfare state: Perceptions and preferences among local politicians. Scandinavian Political Studies 25:357-84.
48. Thompson, James D. 1967. Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
49. Wholey, Joseph S. 1983. Evaluation and effective public management. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
50. Williams, Daniel W. 2003. Measuring government in the early 20th century. Public Administration Review 63:643-59.
51. Wilson, James Q. 2000. Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it, 2nd ed. New York: Basic Books.
52. Wolman, Harold, and Ed Page. 2002. Policy transfer among local governments: An information-theory approach. Governance 15:477-501.
53. Zairi, Mohamed, and Paul Leonard. 1994. Practical benchmarking: The complete guide. London: Chapman and Hall.