The evolution of benchmarking in UK local authorities

Benchmarking: An International Journal

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 429-449

  Bowerman, Mary ^a   Francis, Graham ^b   Ball, Amanda ^c   Fry, Jackie ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b OPEN UNIVERSITY BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Benchmarking; Local government; Performance measurement; Value

Indexed keywords

PERFORMANCE; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

PUBLIC SECTOR;

BENCHMARKING;

EID: 0242301609     PISSN: 14635771     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/14635770210451455     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Abrahamson, E. (1996), “Management fashion”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 254–85.
2. Alexander, A. (1998), “MIDS Public Sector Best Value Programme”, unpublished research report, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow.
3. Ball, A., Bowerman, M. and Hawksworth, S. (2000), “Benchmarking in local government under a central government agenda”, Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 20–34.
4. Ball, A., Broadbent, J. and Moore, C. (2001), The Experience of Implementing Best Value, Working Paper, Royal Holloway, University of London, London.
5. Balm, G.J. (1992), Benchmarking: A Practitioners Guide for Becoming and Staying Best of the Best, QPMA Press, Shaumburg, IL.
6. Bendell, T., Boulter, L. and Goodstadt, P. (1998), Benchmarking for Competitive Advantage, 2nd ed., Pitman, London.
7. Bovaird, T. (1999), Achieving Best Value through Competition, Benchmarking and Performance Networks, Warwick Best Value Series, Paper 6, Local Government Centre, Warwick Business School, Coventry.
8. Bowerman, M. (1996), “The rise and fall of value for money auditing”, in Lapsley, I. and Falconer, M. (Eds), Accounting and Performance Measurement – Issues in the Private and Public Sectors, Paul Chapman Publishing, London, pp. 193–212.
9. Bowerman, M. and Ball, A. (2000), “Great expectations: benchmarking for best value2”, Public Money and Management, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 21–6.
10. Bowerman, M. and Ball, A. (2001), Authorities on Benchmarking? The State of Benchmarking in the UK Local Government Sector, CIMA, London.
11. Bowerman, M., Ball, A. and Francis, G.A.J. (2001), “Benchmarking as a tool for the modernisation of local government”, Financial Accountability and Management, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 321–9.
12. Bowerman, M., Raby, H. and Humphrey, C. (2000), “In search of the Audit Society: some evidence from health care, police and schools”, The International Journal of Auditing, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 71–100.
13. Burchell, S., Clubb, C., Hopwood, A. and Hughes, J. (1980), “The roles of accounting in organisations and society”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 5–27.
14. Cabinet Office (1999), available at: www.open.gov.uk/co/quality/guid_ind.htm.
15. Camp, R. (1989), “Benchmarking: the search for best practices that lead to superior performance, part I”, Quality Progress, pp. 61–8.
16. Camp, R.C. (1995), Business Process Benchmarking: Finding and Implementing Best Practices, ASQC Quality Press, Milwaukee, WI.
17. CIPFA (1996), CIPFA Benchmarking to Improve Performance, CIPFA, London.
18. Coopers & Lybrand (1994), Survey of Benchmarking in the UK, Coopers & Lybrand and CBI National Manufacturing Council, London.
19. Cowper, J. and Samuels, M. (1996), “Performance benchmarking in the public sector: the United Kingdom experience”, in Trosa, S. (Ed.), Benchmarking, Evaluation and Strategic Management in the Public Sector, OECD, Oxford.
20. Cox, A. and Thompson, I. (1998), “On the appropriateness of benchmarking”, Journal of General Management, Vol. 23, pp. 1–20.
21. Dahlberg, L.I. and Isaksson, L. (1996), “The implementation of benchmarking from a Swedish perspective”, in Trosa, S. (Ed.), Benchmarking, Evaluation and Strategic Management in the Public Sector, OECD, Oxford.
22. Davis, P. (1998), “The burgeoning of benchmarking in British local government – the value of learning by looking, in the public services”, Benchmarking for Quality Management and Technology, Vol. 5, pp. 260–70.
23. Department of Health (1997), The New NHS Modern, Dependable, Cm3807, Department of Health, HMSO, London.
24. DETR (1997), Criteria for Project Selection, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, London.
25. DETR (1998a), Modernising Local Government: Improving Local Services through Best Value, Green Paper Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, London.
26. DETR (1998b), Modern Local Government: in Touch with the People, White Paper, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, London, 30 July.
27. DfEE (1997), “Primary performance tables: biggest public information campaign since Second World War”, press release, Department for Education and Employment, London, 11 March.
28. Dorsch, J., Mahmoud, M. and Yasin, A. (1998), “Framework for benchmarking in the public sector. Literature review and directions for future research”, International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 11 No. 2/3, pp. 91–115.
29. Dorset Health Authority (1998), available at: www.dorset.swest.nhs.uk/nhsbench.html.
30. Dunleavy, P. and Hood, C. (1994), “From old public administration to new public management”, Public Money and Management, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 9–16.
31. Elnathan, D., Lin, T.W. and Young, S.M. (1996), “Benchmarking and management accounting: a framework for research”, Journal of Management Accounting Research, Vol. 8, pp. 37–54.
32. Foot, J. (1998), How to Do Benchmarking: A Practitioners Guide, Inter Authorities Group, Epsom.
33. Francis, G.A.J., Hinton, C.M., Holloway, J.A. and Mayle, D. (1998), “Management accountants as best practice benchmarkers”, paper presented at British Accounting Association Conference, Manchester, 1-3 April.
34. Geddes, M. and Martin, S. (2000), “The policy and politics of best value: currents, crosscurrents and undercurrents in the new regime”, Policy and Politics, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 379–95.
35. Glynn, J.J. and Murphy, M.P. (1996), “Public management: failing accountabilities and failing performance review”, International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 9 No. 5/6, pp. 125–37.
36. Henkel, M. (1991), Government, Evaluation and Change, Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London.
37. Hinton, M., Francis, G. and Holloway, J. (2000), “Best practice benchmarking in the UK”, Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 52–61.
38. Holloway, J.A., Francis, G.A.J. and Hinton, C.M. (1999b), “A vehicle for change: a case study of performance improvement in the new public sector”, International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 351–65.
39. Holloway, J.A., Francis, G.A.J., Hinton, C.M. and Mayle, D. (1998), “best practice benchmarking: delivering the goods?”, Total Quality Management, Vol. 9 No. 4/5, pp. 121–5.
40. Holloway, J.A., Hinton, C.M., Francis, G.A.J. and Mayle, D. (1999a), Identifying Best Practice in Benchmarking, Research Monograph CIMA, London.
41. House of Commons Select Committee on Environment (1998), Transport and Regional Affairs Eleventh Report Implementation of the Best Value Framework, House of Commons Select Committee on Environment, London.
42. Humphrey, C., Miller, P. and Scapens, R.W. (1993), “Accountability and accountable management in the UK public sector”, Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 6, pp. 7–29.
43. Humphrey, C., Miller, P. and Smith, H. (1998), “Financial management in the UK public sector: ambiguities, paradoxes and limits”, in Olson, O., Guthrie, J. and Humphrey, C. (Eds), Global Warning! Debating International Developments in New Public Management Financial Management, Cappelen Akademisk Forlag AS, Oslo.
44. Layfield, F. (1976), Local Government Finance: Report of the Committee of Enquiry, HMSO, London.
45. Leibfried, K.H.J. and McNair, C.J. (1992), Benchmarking: A Tool for Continuous Improvement, Harper Business, New York, NY.
46. LGMB (1996), Promoting Better Practice, LGMB, London.
47. LGMB (1997), Benchmarking: Measuring up to the Best, Management Briefing No. 1, LGMB, London.
48. LGMB (1998), Quality, Competition, Benchmarking – Best Value Pilot Bids, LGMB, London.
49. Metcalfe, L. (1998), “Accountability and effectiveness – designing the rules of the accounting game”, keynote paper, Accounting for New Public Management, the European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management International Conference, Venice, 17-19 September.
50. Meyer, W.M. and Gupta, V. (1994), “The performance paradox”, Research in Organisational Behavior, Vol. 16, pp. 309–69.
51. National Audit Office (1999), The PFI Contract for the New Dartford and Gravesham Hospital, HC 423 1998/99, National Audit Office, London, 19 May.
52. NHS Executive (1998), The New NHS Modern. Dependable: A National Framework for Assessing Performance, NHS Executive, London.
53. PSBS (2001), “Benchmarking and modernising government”, available at: www.benchmarking.gov.uk/about_bench/bench_modgov.asp.
54. QAAHE (2000), available at: www.qaa.ac.uk/benchmark/index.htm.
55. Radford, M. (1991), “Auditing for change: local government and the Audit Commission”, The Modern Law Review, Vol. 54 No. 6, pp. 912–32.
56. Samuels, M. (1998), Towards Best Practice: An Evaluation of the First Two Years of the Public Sector Benchmarking Project, 1996-98, Cabinet Office, London.
57. Spendolini, M.J. (1992), The Benchmarking Book, American Management Association, New York, NY.
58. Stephens, A. and Bowerman, M. (1997), “Benchmarking for best value in local authorities”, Management Accounting (CIMA), November, pp. 76–7.
59. Trosa, S. and Williams, S. (1996), Benchmarking in Pubblic Sector Performance Management, Performance Measurement in Government, Occasional Paper No. 9, OECD, Paris.
60. Watson, G.H. (1993), Strategic Benchmarking, Wiley, New York, NY.
61. Wolfram Cox, J.R., Mann, L. and Samson, D. (1997), “Benchmarking as a mixed metaphor: disentangling assumptions of competition and collaboration”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 34, pp. 285–314.