Xbp1-mediated histone H4 deacetylation contributes to DNA double-strand break repair in yeast

Cell Research

Volumn 21, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 1619-1633

  Tao, Ran ^a   Chen, Hua ^a   Gao, Chan ^a   Xue, Peng ^b   Yang, Fuquan ^b   Han, Jing Dong J ^c,d   Zhou, Bing ^a   Chen, Ye Guang ^a  

^a TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b INSTITUTE OF BIOPHYSICS   (China)

^c INSTITUTE OF GENETICS AND DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY   (China)

^d MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE   (Germany)

Author keywords

DNA repair; double strand break; H4 acetylation; Xbp1; yeast

Indexed keywords

CYCLIN DEPENDENT KINASE 1; HISTONE; HISTONE DEACETYLASE; REPRESSOR PROTEIN; RPD3 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; XBP1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE;

ACETYLATION; ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; DNA END JOINING REPAIR; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; METABOLISM; PHOSPHORYLATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; UPREGULATION;

ACETYLATION; CDC2 PROTEIN KINASE; CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINTS; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA END-JOINING REPAIR; HISTONE DEACETYLASES; HISTONES; PHOSPHORYLATION; REPRESSOR PROTEINS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; UP-REGULATION;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCETALES;

EID: 80555126851     PISSN: 10010602     EISSN: 17487838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/cr.2011.58     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Su TT. Cellular responses to DNA damage: One signal, multiple choices. Annu Rev Genet 2006; 40:187-208.
2. Weinert TA, Hartwell LH. The Rad9 gene controls the cell cycle response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 1988; 241:317-322.
3. Harrison JC, Haber JE. Surviving the breakup: The DNA damage checkpoint. Annu Rev Genet 2006; 40:209-235.
4. Lisby M, Barlow JH, Burgess RC, Rothstein R. Choreography of the DNA damage response: Spatiotemporal relationships among checkpoint and repair proteins. Cell 2004; 118:699-713.
5. Melo J, Toczyski D. A unified view of the DNA-damage checkpoint. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2002; 14:237-245.
6. Downs JA, Allard S, Jobin-Robitaille O, et al. Binding of chromatin-modifying activities to phosphorylated histone H2A at DNA damage sites. Mol Cell 2004; 16:979-990.
7. Emili A. MEC1-dependent phosphorylation of Rad9p in response to DNA damage. Mol Cell 1998; 2:183-189.
8. Rogakou EP, Pilch DR, Orr AH, Ivanova VS, Bonner WM. DNA double-stranded breaks induce histone H2AX phosphorylation on serine 139. J Biol Chem 1998; 273:5858-5868.
9. Gilbert CS, Green CM, Lowndes NF. Budding yeast Rad9 is an ATP-dependent Rad53 activating machine. Mol Cell 2001; 8:129-136.
10. Shroff R, Arbel-Eden A, Pilch D, et al. Distribution and dynamics of chromatin modification induced by a defined DNA double-strand break. Curr Biol 2004; 14:1703-1711.
11. Daley JM, Palmbos PL, Wu DL, Wilson TE. Nonhomologous end joining in yeast. Annu Rev Genet 2005; 39:431-451.
12. Kurdistani SK, Grunstein M. Histone acetylation and deacetylation in yeast. Nat Rev Mol Cell Bio 2003; 4:276-284.
13. Peterson CL, Laniel MA. Histones and histone modifications. Curr Biol 2004; 14:R546-R551.
14. Roth SY, Denu JM, Allis CD. Histone acetyltransferases. Annu Rev Biochem 2001; 70:81-120.
15. Yang XJ, Seto E. The Rpd3/Hda1 family of lysine deacetylases: From bacteria and yeast to mice and men. Nat Rev Mol Cell Bio 2008; 9:206-218.
16. Qin S, Parthun MR. Histone H3 and the histone acetyltransferase Hat1p contribute to DNA double-strand break repair. Mol Cell Biol 2002; 22:8353-8365.
17. Haber JE. Transpositions and translocations induced by sitespecific double-strand breaks in budding yeast. DNA Repair 2006; 5:998-1009.
18. Jensen R, Sprague GF, Herskowitz I. Regulation of yeast mating-type interconversion: Feedback control of HO gene expression by the mating-type locus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1983; 80:3035-3039.
19. Kostriken R, Strathern JN, Klar AJ, Hicks JB, Heffron F. A site-specific endonuclease essential for mating-type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 1983; 35:167-174.
20. Strathern JN, Klar AJ, Hicks JB, et al. Homothallic switching of yeast mating type cassettes is initiated by a double-stranded cut in the MAT locus. Cell 1982; 31:183-192.
21. Bird AW, Yu DY, Pray-Grant MG, et al. Acetylation of histone H4 by Esa1 is required for DNA double-strand break repair. Nature 2002; 419:411-415.
22. Jazayeri A, McAinsh AD, Jackson SP. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sin3p facilitates DNA double-strand break repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101:1644-1649.
23. Tamburini BA, Tyler JK. Localized histone acetylation and deacetylation triggered by the homologous recombination pathway of double-strand DNA repair. Mol Cell Biol 2005; 25:4903-4913.
24. Chen CC, Carson JJ, Feser J, et al. Acetylated lysine 56 on histone H3 drives chromatin assembly after repair and signals for the completion of repair. Cell 2008; 134:231-243.
25. Miller KM, Tjeertes JV, Coates J, et al. Human HDAC1 and HDAC2 function in the DNA-damage response to promote DNA nonhomologous end-joining. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2010; 17:1144-1151.
26. Mai B, Breeden L. Xbp1, a stress-induced transcriptional repressor of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Swi4/Mbp1 family. Mol Cell Biol 1997; 17:6491-6501.
27. Mai B, Breeden L. CLN1 and its repression by Xbp1 are important for efficient sporulation in budding yeast. Mol Cell Biol 2000; 20:478-487.
28. Miled C, Mann C, Faye G. Xbp1-mediated repression of CLB gene expression contributes to the modifications of yeast cell morphology and cell cycle seen during nitrogen-limited growth. Mol Cell Biol 2001; 21:3714-3724.
29. Ubersax JA, Woodbury EL, Quang PN, et al. Targets of the cyclin-dependent kinase Cdk1. Nature 2003; 425:859-864.
30. Maas NL, Miller KM, DeFazio LG, Toczyski DP. Cell cycle and checkpoint regulation of histone H3K56 acetylation by Hst3 and Hst4. Mol Cell 2006; 23:109-119.
31. Kupiec M, Simchen G. Regulation of the RAD6 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in the mitotic cell cycle and in meiosis. Mol Gen Genet 1986; 203:538-543.
32. Schwartz JL. Monofunctional alkylating agent-induced Sphase- dependent DNA damage. Mutat Res 1989; 216:111-118.
33. Merrill BJ, Holm C. A requirement for recombinational repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is caused by DNA replication defects of mec1 mutants. Genetics 1999; 153:595-605.
34. Friedberg EC, Walker GC, Siede W. DNA Repair and Mutagenesis. Washington DC: ASM Press, 1995.
35. San Filippo J, Sung P, Klein H. Mechanism of eukaryotic homologous recombination. Annu Rev Biochem 2008; 77:229-257.
36. Yano KI, Morotomi-Yano K, Wang SY, et al. Ku recruits XLF to DNA double-strand breaks. EMBO Rep 2008; 9:91-96.
37. Lai JS, Herr W. Ethidium-bromide provides a simple tool for identifying genuine DNA-independent protein associations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992; 89:6958-6962.
38. Rundlett SE, Carmen AA, Kobayashi R, et al. HDA1 and RPD3 are members of distinct yeast histone deacetylase complexes that regulate silencing and transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996; 93:14503-14508.
39. Moore JK, Haber JE. Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double- strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 1996; 16:2164-2173.
40. Lin YY, Qi Y, Lu JY, et al. A comprehensive synthetic genetic interaction network governing yeast histone acetylation and deacetylation. Genes Dev 2008; 22:2062-2074.
41. Boulton SJ, Jackson SP. Identification of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ku80 homologue: Roles in DNA double strand break rejoining and in telomeric maintenance. Nucleic Acids Res 1996; 24:4639-4648.
42. Schar P, Herrmann G, Daly G, Lindahl T. A newly identified DNA ligase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae involved in RAD52- independent repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Genes Dev 1997; 11:1912-1924.
43. van Attikum H, Gasser SM. ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling and DNA double-strand break repair. Cell Cycle 2005; 4:1011-1014.
44. Tsukuda T, Fleming AB, Nickoloff JA, Osley MA. Chromatin remodelling at a DNA double-strand break site in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 2005; 438:379-383.
45. Linger JG, Tyler JK. Chromatin disassembly and reassembly during DNA repair. Mutat Res 2007; 618:52-64.
46. Verma R, Annan RS, Huddleston MJ, et al. Phosphorylation of Sic1p by G(1) Cdk required for its degradation and entry into S phase. Science 1997; 278:455-460.
47. Moore CW. Internucleosomal cleavage and chromosomal degradation by bleomycin and phleomycin in yeast. Cancer Res 1988; 48:6837-6843.
48. Zhao XL, Muller EGD, Rothstein R. A suppressor of two essential checkpoint genes identifies a novel protein that nega tively affects dNTP pools. Mol Cell 1998; 2:329-340.
49. Groth A, Rocha W, Verreault A, Almouzni G. Chromatin challenges during DNA replication and repair. Cell 2007; 128:721-733.
50. Osley MA, Tsukuda T, Nickoloff JA. ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling factors and DNA damage repair. Mutat Res 2007; 618:65-80.
51. Burke D, Dawson D, Stearns T. Methods in Yeast genetics. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2000.
52. Bahler J, Wu JQ, Longtine MS, et al. Heterologous modules for efficient and versatile PCR-based gene targeting in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Yeast 1998; 14:943-951.
53. Puig O, Caspary F, Rigaut G, et al. The tandem affinity purification (TAP) method: A general procedure of protein complex purification. Methods 2001; 24:218-229.
54. Rigaut G, Shevchenko A, Rutz B, et al. A generic protein purification method for protein complex characterization and proteome exploration. Nat Biotechnol 1999; 17:1030-1032.
55. Pellicioli A, Lucca C, Liberi G, et al. Activation of Rad53 kinase in response to DNA damage and its effect in modulating phosphorylation of the lagging strand DNA polymerase. EMBO J 1999; 18:6561-6572.
56. van Attikum H, Fritsch O, Hohn B, Gasser SM. Recruitment of the INO80 complex by H2A phosphorylation links ATPdependent chromatin remodeling with DNA double-strand break repair. Cell 2004; 119:777-788.
57. Morrison AJ, Highland J, Krogan NJ, et al. INO80 and gamma- H2AX interaction links ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling to DNA damage repair. Cell 2004; 119:767-775.
58. Booth C, Griffith E, Brady G, Lydall D. Quantitative amplification of single-stranded DNA (QAOS) demonstrates that cdc13-1 mutants generate ssDNA in a telomere to centromere direction. Nucleic Acids Res 2001; 29:4414-4422.