Survey article: Citizen panels and the concept of representation

Journal of Political Philosophy

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 203-225

  Brown, Mark B ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645822133     PISSN: 09638016     EISSN: 14679760     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2006.00245.x     Document Type: Review

References (81)

1. Abramson, Jeffrey. 1994. We, the Jury. New York: Basic Books.
2. Andersen, Ida-Elisabeth and Birgit Jæger. 1999. Scenario workshops and consensus conferences: towards more democratic decision-making. Science and Public Policy, 26 (#5): 331-40.
3. Barber, Benjamin R. 1984. Strong Democracy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
4. Bellucci, Sergio et al. 2002. Theoretical perspectives. In Participatory Technology Assessment, ed. Simon Joss and Sergio Bellucci. London: Centre for the Study of Democracy, pp. 13-58.
5. Bohman, James. 1996. Public Deliberation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
6. Burnheim, John. 1985. Is Democracy Possible? Berkeley: University of California Press.
7. Brown, Mark B., Justus Lentsch, and Peter Weingart. Forthcoming. Representation, expertise, and the German parliament: a comparison of three advisory institutions. In Democratization of Expertise? Exploring Novel Forms of Scientific Advice in Political Decision-Making: The 2003 Yearbook of the Sociology of the Sciences, ed. Sabine Maasen and Peter Weingart. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
8. Brutus. 1986. Essay I. Pp. 270-80 in The Anti-Federalist Papers, ed. Ralph Ketchum. New York: Penguin; originally published 1787.
9. Burke, Edmund. 1976. Speech to the electors of Bristol at the conclusion of the poll. Pp.174-6 in Representation, ed. Hanna F. Pitkin. New York: Atherton Press; originally published 1774.
10. Carson, Lyn and Brian Martin. 1999. Random Selection in Politics. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.
11. Carson, Lyn and Brian Martin. 2002. Random selection of citizens for technological decision making. Science and Public Policy, 29 (#2), 105-13.
12. Cohen, Joshua. 1986. An epistemic conception of democracy. Ethics, 97, 26-38.
13. Cohen, Joshua. 1989. Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. Pp. 17-34 in The Good Polity, ed. Alan Hamlin and Philip Pettit. Oxford: Blackwell.
14. Coote, Anna and Jo Lenaghan. 1997. Citizens' Juries: Theory into Practice. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.
15. Connolly, William E. [1974] 1993. The Terms of Political Discourse, 3rd. ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
16. Crosby, Ned. 1995. Citizens juries: one solution for difficult environmental questions. In Renn, Webler and Wiedeman 1995a, pp. 157-87.
17. Dahl, Robert A. 1970. After the Revolution. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
18. Dahl, Robert A. 1989. Democracy and its Critics. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
19. Dewey, John. 1982. Philosophy and democracy. Vol. 11 in The Middle Works, ed. Jo Ann Boydston. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press; originally published 1919.
20. Dienel, Peter. C. 2002. Die Planungszelle: Der Bürger als Chance. 5th edn. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
21. Dienel, Peter C. and Ortwin Renn. 1995. Planning cells: a gate to "fractal mediation." In Renn, Webler and Wiedeman 1995a, pp. 117-40.
22. Dryzek, John S. 2001. Legitimacy and economy in deliberative democracy. Political Theory, 29, 651-69.
23. Dunn, John. 1999. Situating democratic political accountability. Pp. 329-44 in Democracy, Accountabilty, and Representation, ed. Adam Przeworksi, Susan S. Stokes and Bernard Manin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Durant, John. 1995. An experiment in democracy. In Joss and Durant 1995, pp. 75-80.
25. Estland, David. 1997. Beyond fairness and deliberation: the epistemic dimension of democratic authority. Pp. 173-204 in Deliberative Democracy, ed. James Bohman and William Rehg. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
26. Fiorino, Daniel J. 1990. Citizen participation and environmental risk: a survey of institutional mechanisms. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 15 (#2), 226-43.
27. Fishkin, James S. 1991. Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform. New Haven: Yale University Press.
28. Fishkin, James S. 1995. The Voice of the People. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
29. Fishkin, James S. and Robert C. Luskin. 1999a. The quest for deliberative democracy. The Good Society, 9 (#1), 3-9.
30. Fishkin, James S. and Robert C. Luskin. 1999b. Making deliberative democracy work: a reply to Elkin, Lustig, and Sanders. The Good Society, 9 (#1), 22-9.
31. Fixdal, Jon. 1997. Consensus Conferences as "extended peer groups." Science and Public Policy, 24 (#6), 366-76.
32. Gieryn, Thomas F. 1995. Boundaries of science. Pp. 393-443 in Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, ed. Sheila Jasanoff, Gerald E. Markle, James C. Petersen and Trevor Pinch. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
33. Goodin, Robert E. 2003. Reflective Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34. Goodin, Robert E. 2004. Representing diversity. British Journal of Political Science, 34, 453-68.
35. Grundahl, Johs. 1995. The Danish Consensus Conference model. In Joss and Durant 1995, pp. 31-49.
36. Guston, David H. 1999. Evaluating the first U.S. Consensus Conference: the impact of the citizens' panel on telecommunications and the future of democracy. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 24 (#4), 451-82.
37. Gutmann, Amy. 2003. Identity in Democracy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
38. Gutmann, Amy and Dennis Thompson. 1996. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
39. Gutmann, Amy and Dennis Thompson. 1999. Democratic disagreement. Pp. 243-77 in Deliberative Politics, ed. Stephen Macedo. New York: Oxford University Press.
40. Habermas, Jürgen. 1990. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
41. Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms, trans. William Rehg. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
42. Hansen, Mogens Herman. 1991. The Athenian Democracy in the Age of Demosthenes. Oxford: Blackwell.
43. Hardin, Russell. 1997. Deliberation: method, not theory. In Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, ed. James Bohman and William Rehg, pp. 103-119. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
44. Hörning, Georg. 1999. Citizens' panels as a form of deliberative technology assessment. Science and Public Policy, 26 (#5), 351-9.
45. James, Michael Rabinder. 2004. Deliberative Democracy and the Plural Polity. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
46. Jasanoff, Sheila, ed. 2004. States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. London: Routledge.
47. Joss, Simon. 1995. Evaluating Consensus Conferences: necessity or luxury? In Joss and Durant 1995, pp. 89-108.
48. Joss, Simon. 1998. Danish Consensus Conferences as a model of participatory technology assessment: an impact study of Consensus Conferences on Danish Parliament and Danish public debate. Science and Public Policy, 25 (#1), 2-22.
49. Joss, Simon and John Durant, eds. 1995. Public Participation in Science: The Role of Consensus Conferences in Europe. London: Science Museum.
50. Kateb, George. 1992. The moral distinctiveness of representative democracy. Pp. 36-56 in The Inner Ocean. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
51. Latour, Bruno. 2004. Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
52. Leib, Ethan J. 2004. Deliberative Democracy in America: A Proposal for a Popular Branch of Government. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
53. Loomis, C. Douglas. 1996. Radical Democracy. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
54. Madison, James. 1961. Federalist No. 51. Pp. 320-5 in The Federalist Papers, ed. Clinton Rossiter. New York: Penguin; originally published 1787.
55. Manin, Bernard. 1997. The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56. Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. Should blacks represent blacks and women represent women? A contingent 'yes'. Journal of Politics, 61, 628-57.
57. Mansbridge, Jane. 2003. Rethinking representation. American Political Science Review, 97, 515-28.
58. Michelman, Frank I. 1997. How can the people ever make the laws? A critique of deliberative democracy. Pp. 145-71 in Deliberative Democracy, ed. James Bohman and William Rehg. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
59. Parkinson, John. 2003. Legitimacy problems in deliberative democracy. Political Studies, 51, 180-96.
60. Parkinson, John. 2004. Hearing voices: negotiating representation claims in public deliberation. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 6(3): 370-388.
61. Phillips, Anne. 1995. The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
62. Pitkin, Hanna F. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
63. Plotke, David. 1997. Representation is democracy. Constellations, 4, 19-34.
64. Porter, Theodore M. 1995. Trust in Numbers. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
65. Rawls, John. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
66. Renn, Ortwin, Thomas Webler and Peter Wiedemann, eds. 1995a. Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
67. Renn, Ortwin, Thomas Webler and Peter Wiedemann. 1995b. The pursuit of fair and competent citizen participation: evaluating models for environmental discourse. In Renn, Webler and Wiedeman 1995a, pp. 339-67.
68. Rowe, Gene and Lynn J. Frewer. 2000. Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation. Science, Technology & Human Values, 25 (#1), 3-29.
69. Seitz, Brian. 1995. The Trace of Political Representation. Albany: State University of New York Press.
70. Sclove, Richard E. 1996. Town meetings on technology. Technology Review, 99 (#5), 24-31.
71. Schumpeter, J. 1962. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
72. Shapiro, Ian. 2002. Optimal deliberation? Journal of Political Philosophy, 10, 196-211.
73. Smith, G., and S. Stephenson. Forthcoming. The theory and practice of group representation: reflections on the governance of race equality in Birmingham. Public Administration.
74. Smith, Graham, and Corinne Wales. 2000. Citizens' juries and deliberative democracy. Political Studies, 48, 51-65.
75. Stark, Andrew. 2000. What is a balanced committee? Democratic theory, public law, and the question of fair representation on quasi-legislative bodies. In Nomos XXXIX: Ethnicity and Group Rights, ed. Ian Shapiro and Will Kymlicka. New York: New York University Press, pp. 377-420.
76. Tullis, Jeffrey K. 2003. Deliberation between institutions. In Debating Deliberative Democracy, ed. James S. Fishkin and Peter Laslett. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 200-211.
77. Urbinati, Nadia. 2000. Representation as advocacy: a study of democratic deliberation. Political Theory, 28, 758-86.
78. Young, Iris Marion. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
79. Warren, Mark E. 2001. Democracy and Association. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
80. Williams, Melissa S. 1998. Voice, Trust and Memory. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
81. Wynne, Brian. 1996. May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide. In Risk, Environment, and Modernity, ed. Scott Lash, Bronislaw Szerszynski and Brian Wynne. London: Sage, pp. 44-83.