Differences in technology transfer between science-based and development-based industries: Transfer mechanisms and barriers

Technovation

Volumn 31, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 638-647

  Gilsing, Victor ^a   Bekkers, Rudi ^b   Bodas Freitas, Isabel Maria ^c   Van Der Steen, Marianne ^d  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^c POLITECNICO DI TORINO   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Technology transfer barriers; Technology transfer mechanisms; Universityindustry technology transfer

Indexed keywords

DEGREE OF SIMILARITY; INDUSTRIAL SECTOR; POLICY IMPLICATIONS; TRANSFER MECHANISMS; TRANSFER PROCESS; UNIVERSITYINDUSTRY TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

INDUSTRY; PUBLIC POLICY;

TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

EID: 80255136217     PISSN: 01664972     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2011.06.009     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Arundel, A.; Van de Paal, G.; Soete, L.; 1995. PACE Report: Innovation Strategies of Europes Largest Firms: Results of the PACE Survey for Information Sources, Public Research, Protection of Innovations, and Government Programmes. Final Report, MERIT, University of Limburg, Maastricht.
2. A. Arundel, and A. Geuna Proximity and the use of public science by innovative firms European firms Economics of Innovation and New Technology 13 2004 559 580
3. J.M. Azagra-Caro What type of faculty member interacts with what type of firm? Some reasons for the delocalisation of universityindustry interaction Technovation 27 11 2007 704 715 (Pubitemid 47562573)
4. M. Balconi, and A. Laboranti Universityindustry interactions in applied research: the case of microelectronics Research Policy 35 10 2006 1616 1630 (Pubitemid 44792237)
5. R. Bekkers, and I.M. BodasFreitas Analyzing technology transfer channels between universities and industry: to what degree do sectors also matter? Research Policy 37 10 2008 1837 1853
6. J. Bercovitz, and M. Feldman Entrepreneurial universities and technology transfer: a conceptual framework for understanding knowledge-based economic development Journal of Technology Transfer 31 1 2006 175 188 (Pubitemid 43013233)
7. E.P. Berman Why did universities start patenting? Institution-building and the road to the BayhDole Act Social Studies of Science 38 6 2008 835 871
8. P.C. Boardman Beyond the stars: the impact of affiliation with university biotechnology centers on the industrial involvement of university scientists Technovation 28 5 2008 291 297 (Pubitemid 351434614)
9. P.C. Boardman, and B.L. Ponomariov University researchers working with private companies Technovation 29 2 2009 142 153
10. A. Bonaccorsi, and A. Piccaluga A theoretical framework for the evaluation of universityindustry relationships R&D Management 24 3 1994 229 247
11. S. Breschi, F. Malerba, and L. Orsenigo Technological regimes and Schumpeterian patterns of innovation The Economic Journal 110 463 2000 388 410 (Pubitemid 30309852)
12. R.N.A. Bekkers, V.A. Gilsing, and M. van der Steen Determining factors of the effectiveness of IP-based spin-offs: comparing the Netherlands and the US Journal of Technology Transfer 31 5 2006 545 546
13. M. Calderini, C. Franzoni, and A. Vezzulli If star scientists do not patent: the effect of productivity, basicness and impact on the decision to patent in the academic world Research Policy 36 3 2007 303 319 (Pubitemid 46436099)
14. W.M. Cohen, and D.A. Levinthal Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation Administrative Science Quarterly 35 1 1990 128 152
15. W.M. Cohen, R.R. Nelson, and J.P. Walsh Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D Management Science 48 1 2002 1 23 (Pubitemid 34434352)
16. Coriat, B.; Weinstein, O.; 2001. The Organization of R&D and the Dynamics of Innovation. A Sectoral View. European Sectoral Systems of Innovation (ESSY) Working Paper. 〈http://www.cespri.uni-bocconi.it/essy/wpapers. htm〉.
17. B. Coriat, F. Orsi, and O. Weinstein Does biotech reflect a new science-based innovation regime? Industry and Innovation 10 3 2003 231 253 (Pubitemid 37507381)
18. M. Decter, D. Bennett, and M. Leseure University to business technology transfer - UK and USA comparisons Technovation 27 3 2007 145 155 (Pubitemid 46157044)
19. P. D'Este, and P. Patel Universityindustry linkages in the UK: what are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Research Policy 36 9 2007 1295 1313 (Pubitemid 47615127)
20. D. DiGregorio, and S. Shane Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? Research Policy 32 2 2003 209 227
21. G. Dosi, P. Llerena, and M. SylosLabini The relationship between science, technologies and their industrial exploitation: an illustration through the myths and realities of the so-called 'European Paradox' Research Policy 35 10 2006 1450 1464 (Pubitemid 44792238)
22. European Commission, 2008. The Governance Challenges for Knowledge Policies in the Lisbon Strategy: Between Revolution and Illusion. EUR 23469. European Commission, DG Research, Brussels. 43pp.
23. R. Fontana, A. Geuna, and M. Matt Factors affecting universityindustry R&D projects: the importance of searching, screening and signalling Research Policy 35 2 2006 309 323
24. V.A. Gilsing, E. Burg, and A.G.L. van, Romme Policy principles for the creation and success of corporate and academic spin-offs Technovation 30 1 2010 12 23
25. V.A. Gilsing, and B. Nooteboom Exploration and exploitation in innovation systems: the case of pharmaceutical biotechnology Research Policy 35 1 2006 1 23 (Pubitemid 43184056)
26. P. Giuri, M. Mariani.; S. Brusoni, G. Crespi, D. Francoz, A. Gambardella, W. Garcia-Fontes, A. Geuna, R. Gonzales, D. Harhoff, K. Hoisl, C. Le Bas, A. Luzzi, L. Magazzini, L. Nesta, O. Nomaler, N. Palomeras, P. Patel, M. Romanelli, and B. Verspagen Inventors and invention processes in Europe: results from the PatVal-EU survey Research Policy 36 2007 1107 1127 (Pubitemid 47418982)
27. R. Jensen, J.G. Thursby, and M.C. Thursby The disclosure and licensing of university inventions: the best way we can do with the st we get to work with International Journal of Industrial Organization 21 2003 1271 1300
28. M. Kenney, and R. Florida The organization and geography of Japanese R&D: results from a survey of Japanese electronics and biotechnology firms Research Policy 23 3 1994 305 322
29. M. Kenney, and D. Patton Reconsidering the BayhDole Act and the current university ownership model Research Policy 38 9 2009 1407 1422
30. K. Koumpis, and K. Pavitt Corporate activities in speech recognition and natural language: another 'new science'-based technology International Journal of Innovation Management 3 3 1999 335 366
31. S. Krabel, and P. Mueller What drives scientists to start their own company? An empirical investigation of Max Planck Society scientists Research Policy 38 6 2009 947 956
32. J.L. Lin, S.C. Fang, S.R. Fang, and F.S. Tsai Network embeddedness and technology transfer performance in R&D consortia in Taiwan Technovation 29 11 2009 763 774
33. A.N. Link, J.T. Scott, and D.S. Siegel The economics of intellectual property at universities: an overview of the special issue International Journal of Industrial Organisation 21 2003 1217 1225
34. R.E. Litan, L. Mitchell, and E.J. Reedy Commercializing university innovations: alternative approaches A.B. Jaffe, J. Lerner, S. Stern, Innovation Policy and the Economy vol. 8 2007 University of Chicago Press Chicago 31 58
35. E. Mansfield Basic research and productivity increase in manufacturing The American Economic Review 70 5 1980 863 873
36. O. Marsili The Anatomy and Evolution of Industries: Technical Change and Industrial Dynamics 2001 Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. Cheltenham
37. O. Marsili, and B. Verspagen Technology and dynamics of industrial structures: an empirical mapping of Dutch manufacturing Industrial and Corporate Change 11 4 2002 791 815 (Pubitemid 34990162)
38. F. Martin The economic impact of Canadian university R&D Research Policy 27 7 1998 677 687
39. G.S. McMillan, F. Narin, and D.L. Deeds An analysis of the critical role of public science in innovation: the case of biotechnology Research Policy 29 1 2000 1 8
40. J.S. Metcalfe Technology systems and technology policy in an evolutionary framework Cambridge Journal of Economics 19 1 1995 25 46
41. R.R. Nelson, and S.G. Winter An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change 1982 Harvard University Press Cambridge
42. T. Nikulainen, and C. Palmberg Transferring science-based technologies to industry - does nanotechnology make a difference? Technovation 30 1 2010 3 11
43. H. Nowotny, P. Scott, and M. Gibbons Re-thinking Science. Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty 2001 Polity Press Cambridge
44. OECD Turning science into business Patenting and Licensing at Public Research Organizations 2003 OECD Publications Paris
45. K. Pavitt Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory Research Policy 13 6 1984 343 373
46. M. Peneder The problem of private under-investment in innovation: a policy mind map Technovation 28 8 2008 518 530
47. B. Ponomariov, and P.C. Boardman The effect of informal industry contacts on the time university scientists allocate to collaborative research with industry The Journal of Technology Transfer 33 3 2008 301 313
48. M.E. Porter The Competitive Advantage of Nations 1990 MacMillan Press London
49. E. Rasmussen Government instruments to support the commercialization of university research: lessons from Canada Technovation 28 8 2008 506 517
50. A.J. Salter, and B.R. Martin The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review Research Policy 30 3 2001 509 532 (Pubitemid 33674598)
51. S. Shane Academic entrepreneurship. University spin-offs and wealth creation 2004 Edward Elgar Cheltenham (UK)
52. Swann, G.M.P.; 2002. Innovative Businesses and the Science and Technology Base: An Analysis using CIS3 data Report for the Department of Trade and Industry, DTI, London, UK.
53. D.J. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy Research Policy 15 6 1986 285 305
54. F. Tödtling, and M. Trippl One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach Research Policy 34 8 2005 1203 1219 (Pubitemid 41260492)
55. W. Vanhaverbeke, V. Gilsing, B. Beerkens, and G. Duysters The role of alliance network redundancy in the creation of core and non-core technologies Journal of Management Studies 46 2 2009 215 244
56. R. Welsh, L. Glenna, W. Lacy, and D. Biscotti Close enough but not too far: assessing the effects of universityindustry research relationships and the rise of academic capitalism Research Policy 37 10 2008 1854 1864
57. S. Yusuf Intermediating knowledge exchange between universities and business Research Policy 37 8 2008 1167 1174