University to business technology transfer-UK and USA comparisons

Technovation

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 145-155

  Decter, Moira ^a   Bennett, David ^b   Leseure, Michel ^c  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b ASTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c AL AKHAWAYN UNIVERSITY   (Morocco)

Author keywords

Commercialisation; Technology transfer; UK; University research; USA

Indexed keywords

MOTIVATION; PUBLIC POLICY; SURVEYS;

COMMERCIALIZATION; TRANSFER TECHNOLOGY; UNIVERSITY RESEARCH;

TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

EID: 33846497489     PISSN: 01664972     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2006.02.001     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. AUTM, 2000. Surveys-Bayh-Dole Act, November 13, Association of University Technology Managers Website, www. autm.net, site accessed May 2002
2. Brody, R.J., 1996. Effective partnering: a report to congress on federal technology partnerships. Office of Technology Policy, US Department of Commerce, Washington, DC.
3. Brown, G., 2000. Meeting the productivity challenge (Budget 2000). http://www.scotland.gov.uk/budget2000/fsbr/chap3.htm, UK-Treasury
4. Cardozo, R., 2001. Improving the odds of transfer of university technology to the marketplace. In: The 10th International Conference on Management of Technology, IAMOT, 19-22 March, Lausanne, Switzerland (on CD Reference 006RC).
5. Cohen W.M., and Levinthal D.A. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35 1 (1990) 128-152
6. Czinkota M., Ronkainen I., and Moffett M. International Business. sixth ed (2002), Harcourt College Publishers, Orlando
7. Debackere K., Clarysse B., and Rappa M. Autonomy in the industrial laboratory: the dilemma revisited. The Journal of High Technology Management Research 7 1 (1996) 61-78
8. Decter, M.H., Bennett, D.J., 2003. Factors influencing the success of university to business technology transfer-A UK and USA Comparative Study. In: Hosni Y., Khalil T., Morel-Guimaraes, L. (Eds.), From Information to Knowledge to Competencies: Key Success Factors for Innovation and Sustainable Development. Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Management of Technology, ENSGSI/IAMOT, Nancy, France.
9. DTI, 2000. Excellence and opportunity: a science and innovation policy for the 21st century. Command Paper 4814, The Science and Innovation White Paper, 26 July, Department of Trade and Industry, London.
10. DTI, 2001. Science and Innovation Strategy 2001. Department of Trade and Industry, London.
11. Hayton, J.C., George. G., Zahra, S.A., 2002. National culture and entrepreneurship: a review of behavioural research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Summer.
12. Hofstede G. The cultural relativity of organizational practices and theories. In: Wilson D.C., and Rosenfeld R.H. (Eds). Managing Organisations (1997), McGraw-Hill, London 392-405
13. Lambert, R., 2003. Lambert review of business-industry collaboration. Final Report, 2003 December, HMSO, ISBN 0-947819-76-2.
14. Lawton Smith, H., Glasson, J., Simmie, J., Chadwick, A., Clark, G., 2003. Enterprising Oxford: the growth of the Oxfordshire high-tech economy. Oxfordshire Economic Observatory.
15. Leonard-Barton, D., 1990. The inter-organizational environment: point-to-point versus diffusion. In: Williams, F., Gibson, D. (Eds.), Technology Transfer: A Communication Perspective. Sage Publications Ltd., Thousand Oaks, CA.
16. Levin, I.P., 1999. Relating Statistics and Experimental Design. Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA.
17. Lockett A., Murray G., and Wright M. Do UK venture capitalists still have a bias against investment in new technology firms. Research Policy 31 6 (2002) 1009-1030
18. Mann, C., Stewart, F., 2000. Internet Communication and Qualitative Research. A Handbook for Researching Online. Sage Publications Ltd, London.
19. Mansfield E. Academic research and industrial innovation: an update of empirical findings. Research Policy 26 (1998) 773-776
20. Markham, S., Kingon, A., Zapata, M., Baumer, D., 1999. A methodology to find assess and commercialize technologies, civilization, modern technology and sustainable development. In: The Eighth International Conference on Management of Technology, IAMOT, 15-17 March, Cairo.
21. Millar, J., Senker, J., 2000. International approaches to research policy and funding: university research policy in different national contexts. Final Report prepared for the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE), Science Policy Research Unit, Sussex University, UK.
22. Mowery D., Nelson R., Sampat B., and Ziedonis A. The growth of patenting and licensing by US universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980. Research Policy 30 (2001) 99-119
23. Mowery, D., 2005. The Bayh-Dole Act and high-technology entrepreneurship in US universities: chicken, egg, or something else? Colloquium on Entrepreneurship Education and Technology Transfer, University of Arizona, 21-22 January.
24. P.L. 96-517, 1980. Public Law 96-517, USA Government Patent and Trademark Act Amendments of 1980, 12 December (Also known as the Bayh-Dole Act).
25. Salter, A., D'Este, P., Pavitt, K., Scott, A., Martin, B., Geuna, A., Nightingale, P., Patel, P., 2000. Talent, Not Technology: The Impact of Publicly Funded Research on Innovation in the UK. Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex, UK.
26. Tidd J., Bessant J., and Pavitt K. Managing Innovation-Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change. second ed (2001), Wiley, Chichester
27. Thursby, J., Thursby, M., 2004. Are faculty critical? their role in university-industry licensing. Contemporary Economic Policy, 22 April, vol. 2, ABI/INFORM Global
28. Willey, T.F., 1999. Technology Transfer and Licensing Activities of ARCH Development Corporation and the Impact of Federal R&D Technology Transfer Programs on Universities and Small Business, US Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, Hearing on Federal R&D Technology Transfer Programs, 15 April 1999. The Journal of the Association of University Technology Managers XI.
29. Wittamore, K., Bahns, R., Brown, A., Carter, P., Clements, G., Young, C., 1998. International technology transfer-a developing empirical model, management of technology, sustainable development and eco-efficiency. In: The Seventh International Conference on Management of Technology, 16-20 February, Orlando (on CD).