The problem of private under-investment in innovation: A policy mind map

Technovation

Volumn 28, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 518-530

  Peneder, Michael ^a  

^a AUSTRIAN INSTITUTE OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH WIFO   (Austria)

Author keywords

Corporate finance; Fiscal incentives; Innovation policy; Technological change; Venture capital

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER NETWORKS; FINANCE; INNOVATION; INVESTMENTS; MAPS; PAPER; TECHNOLOGY;

(OTDR) TECHNOLOGY; (R ,S ,S) POLICY; APPROPRIABILITY; CAPITAL MARKETS; CORPORATE FINANCE; ELSEVIER (CO); EXTERNAL SOURCES; INNOVATION POLICIES; MIND MAPS; MUTUAL AWARENESS; POLICY MAKERS;

PUBLIC POLICY;

FINANCE; INCENTIVES; INNOVATION; MARKETING; PAPER; PROBLEM SOLVING; RESTRAINTS; TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 45649085427     PISSN: 01664972     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2008.02.006     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Arrow K.J. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In: Nelson R.R. (Ed). The Rate and Direction of Incentive Activity (1962), Princeton University Press, Princeton
2. Baygan, G., 2003. Venture capital policy review: United Kingdom. STI Working Paper 2003/1. OECD, Paris [see also the reviews for Korea (WP 2003/2); Israel (WP 2003/3); Canada (WP 2003/4); Denmark (WP 2003/10), Sweden (WP 2003/11); United States (WP 2003/12); Norway (WP 2003/17); Spain (WP 2003/18); and Portugal (WP 2003/19)].
3. Berger A.N., and Udell G.F. The economics of small business finance: the roles of private equity and debt markets in the financial growth cycle. Journal of Banking and Finance 22 (1998) 613-673
4. Bloom N., Griffith R., and Van Reenen J. Do R&D tax credits work? Evidence from a panel of countries 1979-97. Journal of Public Economics 85 1 (2002) 1-31
5. Blundell, R., Costa Dias, M., 2002. Alternative approaches to evaluation in empirical microeconomics. CeMMAP Working Paper CWP 10/02.
6. Boskaya, A., van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B., 2004. Who funds technology-based small firms? Evidence from Belgium. Working Paper WP-CEB 04/027. Université Libre de Bruxelles, Solvay Business School, Centre Emile Bernheim (CEB).
7. Bottazzi L., and Da Rin M. Venture capital in Europe and the financing of innovative companies, European venture capital. Economic Policy 17 (2002) 229-270
8. Carpenter R.E., and Petersen B.C. Capital market imperfections, high-tech investment, and new equity financing. The Economic Journal 112 (2002) 54-72
9. Chang P.-L., and Shih H.-L. The innovation systems of Taiwan and China: a comparative analysis. Technovation 24 7 (2004) 529-539
10. David P.A., Hall B.H., and Toole A.A. Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy 29 (2000) 497-529
11. Durao D., Saramento M., Varela V., and Maltez L. Virtual and real-estate science and technology parks: a case study of Taguspark. Technovation 25 3 (2005) 237-244
12. Edquist C. Systems of innovation; perspectives and challenges. In: Fagerberg J., et al. (Ed). The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (2005), Oxford University Press, Oxford Kapitel 7
13. Engel, D., 2003. Höheres Beschäftigungswachstum durch Venture Capital? Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 223/1. Lucius & Lucius, Stuttgart, pp. 1-22.
14. Engel D., and Keilbach M. Firm level implications of early stage Venture Capital investment-an empirical investigation. Journal of Empirical Finance 14 (2007) 150-167
15. European Commission. Raising EU R&D intensity. Improving the effectiveness of the mix of public support mechanisms for private sector research and development (2003), European Communities, Luxembourg
16. European Commission. Innovation in Europe: data 1998-2001 (2004), European Communities, Luxembourg
17. European Commission, 2006. European Competitiveness Report 2006, Luxembourg.
18. Fahrenkrog, G., Polt, W., Rojo, J. Tübke, A., Zinoecker, K. (Eds.), 2002. RTD evaluation toolbox-assessing the socio-economic impacts of RTD-policies. IPTS Technical Report Series, Sevilla.
19. Falk, R., 2005. Behavioural additionality effects of R&D subsidies: empirical evidence from Austria. Paper presented at the 32nd Conference of the European Association of Research in Industrial Economics (EARIE), 1-4 September 2005, Porto.
20. Georghiou, L., 2005. Behavioural additionality. Presentation at the OECD Workshop on 'Measuring the Behavioural Additionality Effects of Government Financing of Business R&D: Lessons from Country Studies', Vienna, 31 January-1 February, 2005 see 〈http://www.oecd.org/document/0/0,2340,en_2649_34273_34538432_1_1_1_1,00.html〉.
21. Geroski P. Markets for technology: knowledge, innovation and appropriability. In: Stoneman P. (Ed). Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change (1995), Basil Blackwell, Oxford 90-131
22. Gompers P., and Lerner J. The venture capital cycle (1999), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
23. Granstrand O. Innovation and intellectual property rights. In: Fagerberg J., et al. (Ed). The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (2005), Oxford University Press, Oxford Kapitel 10
24. Guellec D., and van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie B. The impact of public R&D expenditure on business R&D. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 12 3 (2003) 225-243
25. Guellec D., and van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie B. From R&D to productivity growth: do the institutional settings and the source of funds of R&D matter?. Oxford Bulleting of Economics and Statistics 66 3 (2004) 353-378
26. Hall B.H. The financing of research and development. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 18 1 (2002) 35-51
27. Hall B.H., and Van Reenen J. How effective are fiscal incentives for R&D? A review of the evidence. Research Policy 29 (2000) 449-469
28. Harhoff, D., Licht, G., Altmann, G., Kurz, S., 2001. Innovationswege im Maschinenbau. Ergebnisse einer Befragung mittelständischer Unternehmen. Impuls-Stiftung für den Maschinenbau, den Anlagenbau und die Informationstechnik, Frankfurt am Main.
29. Heckman J.J., LaLonde R.J., and Smith J.A. The economics and econometrics of active labor market programs. In: Ashenfelter A., and Card D. (Eds). Handbook of Labor Economics vol. 3 (1999), Elsevier 1865-2097
30. Hogan T., and Hutson E. Capital structure in new technology-based firms: evidence from the Irish software sector. Global Finance Journal 15 3 (2005) 369-387
31. Hölzl W. Convergence of financial systems: towards an evolutionary perspective. Journal of Institutional Economics 2 1 (2006) 67-90
32. Hutschenreiter G. Tax incentives for research and development. Austrian Economic Quarterly 2 (2002) 74-85
33. In: Hyytinen A.A., and Pajarinen M. (Eds). Financial Systems and Firm Performance. Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives (2003), Taloustieto, Helsinki
34. Leyden D.P., Link A.N., and Bozeman B. The effects of governmental financing on firms' R&D activities: a theoretical and empirical investigation. Technovation 9 7 (1989) 561-575
35. Lundvall B.E., and Borras S. Science, technology and innovation policy. In: Fagerberg J., et al. (Ed). The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (2005), Oxford University Press, Oxford Kapitel 22
36. Marsh D. Does New Zealand have an innovation system for biotechnology?. Technovation 23 2 (2003) 103-112
37. Mowery D. The practice of technology policy. In: Stoneman P. (Ed). Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change (1995), Basil Blackwell, Oxford 513-557
38. Myers S.C. Capital structure. Journal of Economic Perspectives 15 (2001) 81-102
39. Nelson R.R. The simple economics of basic scientific research. Journal of Political Economy 49 (1959) 297-306
40. OECD. Tax incentives for research and development: trends and issues (2003), OECD, Paris
41. OECD. Synthesis report: Venture Capital trends and policies (2003), OECD, Paris
42. O'Sullivan M. Finance and innovation. In: Fagerberg J., et al. (Ed). The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (2005), Oxford University Press, Oxford Kapitel 9
43. Peneder M. Entrepreneurial Competition and Industrial Location (2001), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
44. Peneder M. The impact of venture capital on innovation behaviour and firm growth (2008), mimeo
45. Perez C. Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital. The Dynamics of Bubbles and Golden Ages (2003), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK
46. Romain, A., van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B., 2003. The determinants of venture capital: a panel data analysis of 16 OECD countries. IIR Working Paper WP#03-25. Institute of Innovation Research, Hitotsubashi University, Tokyo.
47. Romain, A., van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B., 2004. The economic impact of venture capital. Discussion Paper No. 18/2004, Deutsche Bundesbank, Frankfurt am Main.
48. Stiglitz J.E., and Weiss A. Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information. American Economic Review 71 3 (1981) 383-410
49. Warda, J., 2001. Measuring the value of R&D tax treatment in OECD countries. STI Review No. 27. OECD, Paris
50. Ylä-Anttila P., and Palmberg C. Economic and industrial policy transformations in Finland. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade 7 3 (2007) 169-187