What type of faculty member interacts with what type of firm? Some reasons for the delocalisation of university-industry interaction

Technovation

Volumn 27, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 704-715

  Azagra Caro, Joaquín M ^a  

^a INGENIO CSIC UPV Technical University of Valencia   (Spain)

Author keywords

University industry interaction

Indexed keywords

PERSONNEL; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING;

FACULTY MEMBERS; UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY INTERACTION;

INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT;

EID: 35248863931     PISSN: 01664972     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2007.05.003     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Acosta Ballesteros J., and Modrego Rico A. Public financing of cooperative R&D projects in Spain: the Concerted Projects under the National R&D Plan. Research Policy 30 (2001) 625-641
2. Acs Z.J., Audretsch D.B., and Feldman M.P. Real effects of academic research: comment. American Economic Review 82 1 (1991) 363-367
3. Adeoti J., and Adeoti A. Biotechnology R&D partnership for industrial innovation in Nigeria. Technovation 25 (2005) 349-365
4. Arundel A., and Geuna A. Proximity and the use of public science by innovative European firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 13 6 (2004) 559-580
5. Azagra-Caro J.M. The regional dimension of university-industry interaction. In: Folmer H., and Suriñach J. (Eds). Knowledge Externalities, Innovation Clusters and Regional Development (2007), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham and Northampton, UK (Chapter 9)
6. Azagra-Caro J.M., Archontakis F., Fernández de Lucio I., and Gutiérrez Gracia A. Faculty support for the objectives of university-industry relations versus degree of R&D cooperation: the importance of regional absorptive capacity. Research Policy 35 (2006) 37-55
7. Azagra-Caro, J.M., Aznar-Márquez, J., Blanco, J.M., 2007. Interactive vs. non-interactive knowledge production by faculty members. Applied Economics, forthcoming.
8. Bayona C., García-Marco T., and Huerta E. Firm's motivation for cooperative R&D: an empirical analysis of Spanish firms. Research Policy 30 (2001) 1289-1307
9. Beise M., and Stahl H. Public research and industrial innovations in Germany. Research Policy 28 4 (1999) 397-422
10. Bilimoria D., Perry S.R., Liang X., Stoller E.P., Higgins P., and Taylor C. How do female and male faculty members construct job satisfaction?. Journal of Technology Transfer 31 3 (2006) 355-365
11. Buesa M., Heijs J., Martínez Pellitero M., and Baumert T. Regional systems of innovation and the knowledge production function: the Spanish case. Technovation 26 (2006) 463-472
12. Bush V. Science, the Endless Frontier: A Report to the President (1945), National Science Foundation, Washington, DC (Reprint 1960)
13. Caloghirou, Y., Vonortas, N.S., Tsakanikas, A., 2000. University-industry cooperation in research and development. Organizational Issues in University Technology Transfer, Indianapolis, US, 9-11 June.
14. Cohen W.M., and Levinthal D.A. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35 1 (1990) 128-152
15. D'Este, P., Patel, P., 2005. University-industry linkages in the UK: what are the factors determining the variety of interactions with industry. In: Proceedings of 5th Triple Helix Conference, Turin, Italy, 18-21 May.
16. Escolano Zamorano E. Entre la discriminación y el mérito: Las profesoras en las universidades valencianas (2006), Universitat de València, Valencia
17. Etzkowitz H., and Leydesdorff L. Emergence of a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Science and Public Policy 23 (1996) 279-286
18. Fernández de Lucio I., Gutiérrez Gracia A., Azagra Caro J., and Jiménez Sáez F. Las debilidades y fortalezas del sistema valenciano de innovación. In: Olazarán M., and Gómez Uranga M. (Eds). Sistemas regionales de innovación (2001), Universidad País Vasco
19. Freeman C. Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan (1987), Pinter, London
20. Gibbons M., Limoges C., Nowotny H., Schwartzman S., Scoot P., and Trow M. The New Production of Knowledge (1994), Sage Publications
21. Granovetter, M. S., 1970. Changing Jobs: Channels of Mobility Information in a Suburban Community. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.
22. Granovetter M.S. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78 6 (1973) 1360-1380
23. Griliches Z. Research costs and social returns: hybrid corn and related innovations. Journal of Political Economy 56 (1958) 419-431
24. Hanel P., and St-Pierre M. Industry-university collaboration by Canadian manufacturing firms. Journal of Technology Transfer 31 4 (2006) 485-499
25. Jaffe A.B. Real effects of academic research. American Economic Review 79 5 (1989) 957-970
26. Kline S.J., and Rosenberg N. An overview of innovation. In: Landau R., and Rosenberg N. (Eds). The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth (1986), National Academy Press, Washington 275-306
27. Kotrlick J.W., Bertlett II J.E., Higgins C.C., and Williams H.A. Factors associated with research productivity of agricultural education faculty. Journal of Agricultural Education 43 3 (2002) 1-10
28. Laursen K., and Salter A. Searching low and high: what types of firms use universities as a source of innovation?. Research Policy 33 (2003) 1201-1215
29. Lee Y.S. Technology transfer and the research university: a search for the boundaries of university-industry collaboration. Research Policy 25 (1996) 843-863
30. Lundvall B.A. Innovation as an interactive process: from user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation. In: Dosi G., Freeman C., Nelson R., Silverberg G., and Soete L. (Eds). Technical Change and Economic Theory (1988), Pinter, London
31. Mansfield E. Industrial Research and Technological Innovation-An Econometric Analysis (1968), Norton, New York
32. Mansfield E. Academic research and industrial innovation. Research Policy 20 (1991) 1-12
33. Marques J.P.C., Caraça J.M.G., and Diz H. How can university-industry-government interactions change the innovation scenario in Portugal?-the case of the University of Coimbra. Technovation 26 (2006) 534-542
34. Martinez-Sanchez A., and Pastor-Tejedor A.C. University-industry relationships in peripheral regions: the case of Aragon in Spain. Technovation 15 10 (1995) 613-625
35. Merton R.K. The Matthew effect in science. Science 159 (1968) 56-63
36. Molas-Gallart, J., Salter, A., Patel, P., Scott, A., Duran, X., 2002. Measuring Third Stream Activities. Final Report to the Russell Group to the Russell Group of Universities. SPRU, University of Sussex.
37. Molero J., and Buesa J. Patterns of technological change among Spanish innovative firms: the case of the Madrid region. Research Policy 25 (1996) 647-663
38. Mora-Valentin E.M., Montoro-Sanchez A., and Guerras-Martin L.A. Determining factors in the success of R&D cooperative agreements between firms and research organizations. Research Policy 33 (2004) 17-40
39. Narin F., and Noma E. Is technology becoming science?. Scientometrics 7 3-6 (1985) 369-381
40. Narin F., Hamilton K.S., and Olivastro D. The increasing linkage between US technology and public science. Research Policy 26 3 (1997) 317-330
41. Niosi, J., Bellon, B., 2002. The absorptive capacity of regions. Colloque Economie Mediterranee Monde Arabe, Sousse, 20-21 September.
42. Rasmussen E., Moen Ø., and Guldbransen M. Initiatives to promote commercialization of university knowledge. Technovation 26 (2006) 518-533
43. Sabatier M., Carrere M., and Mangematin V. Profiles of academic activities and careers: does gender matter?. Journal of Technology Transfer 31 3 (2006) 311-324
44. Salter A.J., and Martin B.R. The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review. Research Policy 30 (2001) 509-532
45. Schartinger D., Rammer C., Fischer M.M., and Frölich J. Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: sectoral patterns and determinants. Research Policy 31 (2002) 303-328
46. Scherer F.M. Firm size, market structure, opportunity and the output of patented inventions. American Economic Review 55 (1965) 1097-1125
47. Scott, A., Steyn, G., Geuna, A., Brusoni, S., Steinmueller, E.W., 2002. The economic returns to basic research and the benefits of university-industry relationships: a literature review and update of findings. SPRU: Report for the Office of Science and Technology.
48. Stephan P. The economics of science. Journal of Economic Literature 34 3 (1996) 1199-1235
49. Vedovello C. Science parks and university-industry interaction: geographical proximity between the agents as a driving force. Technovation 17 9 (1997) 491-502
50. Xie Y., and Shauman K.A. Sex differences in research productivity revisited: new evidence about an old puzzle. American Sociological Review 63 (1998) 847-870