Technological regimes and schumpeterian patterns of innovation

Economic Journal

Volumn 110, Issue 463, 2000, Pages 388-410

  Breschi, Stefano ^a   Malerba, Franco ^b   Orsenigo, Luigi ^c  

^a Libero Istituto Universitario Carlo Cattaneo (LIUC)   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRESCIA   (Italy)

^c BOCCONI UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPETITIVENESS; INNOVATION; LEARNING; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 0034024395     PISSN: 00130133     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1468-0297.00530     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Acs, Z. J. and Audretsch, D. B. (1988). 'Innovation in large and small firms: an empirical analysis.' American Economic Review, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 678-690.
2. Arundel, A., van de Paal, G. and Soete, L. (1995). 'Innovation strategies of Europe's largest industrial firms: results of the PACE survey for information sources, public research, protection of innovations and government programmes.' Report for the SPRINT Programme, DG XIII EC, MERIT Institute, University of Limburg.
3. Audretsch, D. B. (1995). Innovation and Industry Evolution. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
4. Breschi, S. and Malerba, F. (1997). 'Sectoral innovation systems: technological regimes, Schumpeterian dynamics and spatial boundaries'. In (C. Edquist, ed.) Systems of Innovation. Technologies, Institutions and Organisation, pp. 130-56. London: Cassell.
5. Christensen, C. M. and Rosenbloom, R. (1995). 'Explaining the attacker's advantage: technological paradigms, organisational dynamism and the value network.' Research Policy, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 233-57.
6. Cohen, W. M. (1995). 'Empirical studies of innovative activities.' In (P. Stoneman, ed.) Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change, pp. 182-264, Oxford: Blackwell.
7. Cohen, W. M. and Levin, R. C. (1989). 'Empirical studies of innovation and market structure.' In (R. Schmalensee and R. Willig, eds.) Handbook of Industrial Organisation, pp. 1059-107, Amsterdam: North Holland.
8. Cohen, W. M., Levin, R. C. and Mowery, D. C. (1987). 'Firm size and R&D intensity: a re-examination.' Journal of Industrial Economics, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 543-65.
9. Cohen, W.M. and Levinthal, D.A. (1989). 'Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D.' ECOMOMIC JOURNAL, vol. 99 (September), pp. 569-96.
10. Dasgupta, P. and Stiglitz, J. (1980). 'Industrial structure and the nature of innovative activity.' ECONOMIC JOURNAL, vol. 90, (June), pp. 266-93.
11. Dosi, G. (1982). 'Technological paradigms and technological trajectories, a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change.' Research Policy, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 147-62.
12. Dosi, G. (1988). 'The microeconomic sources and effects of innovation.' Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 1120-71.
13. Dosi, G., Marsili, O., Orsenigo, L. and Salvatore, R. (1995). 'Technological regime, selection and market structure.' Small Business Economics, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 411-36.
14. Gilbert, R. and Newbery, D. (1982). 'Preemptive patenting and the persistence of monopoly.' American Economic Review, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 514-26.
15. Gort, M. and Klepper, S. (1982). 'Time paths in the diffusion of product innovations.' ECONOMIC JOURNAL, vol. 92, (September), pp. 630-53.
16. Griliches, Z. (1990). 'Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey.' Journal of Economic Literature vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 1661-707.
17. Henderson, R. and Clark, K. (1990). 'Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms.' Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 35, (March), pp. 9-30
18. Iwai, K. (1984a). 'Schumpeterian dynamics part I: an evolutionary model of selection and imitation.' Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organisation, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 159-90.
19. Iwai, K. (1984b). 'Schumpeterian dynamics part II: technological progress, firm growth and economic selection.' Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organisation, vol. 5, no. 3-4, pp. 321-51.
20. Jovanovic, B. (1982). 'Selection and evolution of industry.' Econometrica, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 649-70.
21. Jovanovic, B. and Lach, S. (1988). 'Entry, exit and diffusion with learning-by-doing.' American Economic Review, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 690-9.
22. Kamien, M. I. and Schwartz, N. L. (1982). Market Structure and Innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Klepper, S. (1996). 'Entry, exit, growth and innovation over the product life cycle.' American Economic Review, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 562-83.
24. Klevorick, A. K., Levin, R. C., Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. (1995). 'On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities.' Research Policy, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 185-205.
25. Levin, R. C. (1988). 'Appropriability, R&D spending and technological performance.' American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 424-8.
26. Levin, R. C., Cohen, W. M. and Mowery, D. C. (1985). 'R&D, appropriability, opportunity, and market structure: New evidence on some Schumpeterian hypotheses.' American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 20-4.
27. Levin, R. C., Klevorick, A. K., Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. (1987). 'Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development.' Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 3, pp. 783-820.
28. Levin, R. C. and Reiss, P. C. (1988). 'Cost-reducing and demand creating R&D with spillovers.' Rand Journal of Economics, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 538-56.
29. Malerba, F. and Orsenigo, L. (1990). 'Technological regimes and patterns of innovation: a theoretical and empirical investigation of the Italian case'. In (A. Heertje and M. Perlman, eds.) Evolving Technologies and Market Structure, pp. 283-306, Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.
30. Lundvall, B. A. (1993). National Systems of Innovation. London: Pinter.
31. Malerba, F. and Orsenigo, L. (1993). 'Technological regimes and firm behaviour.' Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 45-71.
32. Malerba, F. and Orsenigo, L. (1994). 'Schumpeterian patterns of innovation.' Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 47-66.
33. Malerba, F. and Orsenigo, L. (1996). 'Schumpeterian patterns of innovation are technology specific.' Research Policy, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 451-78.
34. Malerba, F. and Orsenigo, L. (1999). 'Technological entry, exit and survival.' Research Policy, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 645-60.
35. Nelson, R. R. (1993). National Innovation Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36. Nelson, R. R. (1995). 'Recent evolutionary thinking about economic change.' Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 33, (March), pp. 48-90.
37. Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge (Mass.): The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
38. Pavitt, K. (1984). 'Sectoral patterns of innovation: towards a taxonomy and a theory.' Research Policy vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 343-73.
39. Pavitt, K., Robson, M. and Townsend, J. (1987). 'The size distribution of innovating firms in the UK: 1945-83.' Journal ofIndustrial Economics, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 297-316.
40. Rosenberg, N. (1982). Inside the Black Box. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Rosenberg, N. (1990). 'Why do firms do basic research (with their own money)?.' Research Policy, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 165-74.
42. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard Economic Studies.
43. Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers.
44. Teece, D. J. (1986). 'Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy.' Research Policy, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 286-305.
45. Utterback, J. M. and Abernathy, W. J. (1975). 'A dynamic model of product and process innovation.' Omega, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 639-56.
46. Winter, S. G. (1984). 'Schumpeterian competition in alternative technological regimes.' Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, vol. 5, (September-December), pp. 287-320.
47. Winter, S. G. (1987). 'Knowledge and competence as strategic assets'. In (D. J. Teece, ed.) The Competitive Challenge: Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal, pp. 159-84, Cambridge Mass.: Ballinger.
48. World Intellectual Property Organization (1994). International Patent Classification (6th Edition), Geneve.