Inbreeding depression in red deer calves

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Walling, Craig A ^a   Nussey, Daniel H ^a   Morris, Alison ^a   Clutton Brock, Tim H ^b   Kruuk, Loeske E B ^a   Pemberton, Josephine M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEER; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FITNESS; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; JUVENILE; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; MAMMAL; SURVIVAL; WILD POPULATION;

CERVUS ELAPHUS; MAMMALIA;

AGE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIRTH WEIGHT; DEER; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; GENETICS; INBREEDING; MALE; NEWBORN; PEDIGREE; PHYSIOLOGY; SURVIVAL;

AGE FACTORS; ANIMALS; ANIMALS, NEWBORN; BIRTH WEIGHT; DEER; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; INBREEDING; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PEDIGREE; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 80054991863     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712148     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-318     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. The genetic basis of inbreeding depression. Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D, Genetics Research 1999 74 03 329 340 10.1017/S0016672399004152 (Pubitemid 30076811)
2. Inbreeding Depression and its Evolutionary Consequences. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B, Annu Rev Ecol Syst 1987 18 1 237 268 10.1146/annurev.es.18. 110187.001321
3. Inbreeding depression in the wild. Crnokrak P, Roff DA, Heredity 1999 83 3 260 270 10.1038/sj.hdy.6885530 10504423 (Pubitemid 29498795)
4. Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Keller LF, Waller DM, TREE 2002 17 5 230 241 (Pubitemid 34270584)
5. The need for a better understanding of inbreeding effects on population growth. Keller LF, Biebach I, Hoeck PEA, Anim Conserv 2007 10 3 286 287 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2007.00133.x (Pubitemid 47248445)
6. Captivity masks inbreeding effects on male mating success in butterflies. Joron M, Brakefield PM, Nature 2003 424 6945 191 194 10.1038/nature01713 12853956 (Pubitemid 36858685)
7. The Environmental Dependence of Inbreeding Depression in a Wild Bird Population. Szulkin M, Sheldon BC, PLoS ONE 2007 2 10 7.
8. Inbreeding depression in benign and stressful environments. Armbruster P, Reed DH, Heredity 2005 95 3 235 242 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800721 16077737 (Pubitemid 43093238)
9. Is inbreeding depression more severe in a stressful environment? Miller PS, Zoo Biol 1994 13 3 195 208 10.1002/zoo.1430130302
10. A test of evolutionary theories of aging. Hughes KA, Alipaz JA, Drnevich JM, Reynolds RM, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002 99 22 14286 14291 10.1073/pnas.222326199 12386342 (Pubitemid 35257664)
11. Quantitative genetic tests of recent senescence theory: age-specific mortality and male fertility in Drosophila melanogaster. Snoke MS, Promislow DEL, Heredity 2003 91 6 546 556 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800353 13130305 (Pubitemid 38012606)
12. Testing evolutionary models of senescence in a natural population: age and inbreeding effects on fitness components in song sparrows. Keller LF, Reid JM, Arcese P, Proc R Soc B 2008 275 1635 597 604 10.1098/rspb.2007.0961 18211879 (Pubitemid 351198038)
13. Les mathématiques de l'hérédité Malécot G, Paris: Masson 1948
14. Microsatellite measures of inbreeding: A meta-analysis. Coltman DW, Slate J, Evolution 2003 57 5 971 983 12836816 (Pubitemid 36726555)
15. Heterozygosity-fitness correlations: new perspectives on old problems. David P, Heredity 1998 80 5 531 537 10.1046/j.1365-2540.1998.00393.x 9650277 (Pubitemid 28276295)
16. A quantitative review of heterozygosity-fitness correlations in animal populations. Chapman JR, Nakagawa S, Coltman DW, Slate J, Sheldon BC, Mol Ecol 2009 18 13 2746 2765 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04247.x 19500255
17. Understanding the relationship between the inbreeding coefficient and multilocus heterozygosity: theoretical expectations and empirical data. Slate J, David P, Dodds KG, Veenvliet BA, Glass BC, Broad TE, McEwan JC, Heredity 2004 93 3 255 265 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800485 15254488 (Pubitemid 39147529)
18. Does heterozygosity estimate inbreeding in real populations? Balloux F, Amos W, Coulson T, Mol Ecol 2004 13 10 3021 3031 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02318. x 15367117 (Pubitemid 39290228)
19. Measuring inbreeding depression in the wild: the old ways are the best. Pemberton J, TREE 2004 19 12 613 615 16701322 (Pubitemid 39471289)
20. Heterozygosity-fitness correlations: A time for reappraisal. Szulkin M, Bierne N, David P, Evolution 2010 64 5 1202 1217 20148954
21. Environment-dependent inbreeding depression: its ecological and evolutionary significance. Cheptou P-O, Donohue K, New Phytol 2011 189 2 395 407 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03541.x 21091479
22. Inbreeding depression increases with environmental stress: An experimental study and meta-alalysis. Fox CW, Reed DH, Evolution 2011 65 1 246 258 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01108.x 20731715
23. Interplay between habitat fragmentation and climate change: inbreeding affects the response to thermal stress in Drosophila melanogaster. Joubert D, Bijlsma R, Clim Res 2010 43 1-2 57 70
24. Genotypic-environmental interactions for various temperatures in Drosophila melanogaster. Parsons PA, Genetics 1959 44 6 1325 1333 17247896
25. Components of fitness. Thoday JM, Symposia of the society for experimental biology 1953 7 96 113
26. Extreme temperatures increase the deleterious consequences of inbreeding under laboratory and semi-natural conditions. Kristensen TN, Barker JSF, Pedersen KS, Loeschcke V, Proc R Soc B 2008 275 1646 2055 2061 10.1098/rspb.2008.0426 18522910 (Pubitemid 351989781)
27. Female sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus use self-reference to optimize MHC allele number during mate selection. Aeschlimann PB, Häberli MA, Reusch TBH, Boehm T, Milinski M, Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2003 54 2 119 126 (Pubitemid 36844447)
28. Relative Fitness of Selfed and Outcrossed Progeny in a Self-Compatible, Protandrous Species, Sabatia angularis L. (Gentianaceae): A Comparison in Three Environments. Dudash MR, Evolution 1990 44 5 1129 1139 10.2307/2409277
29. Effect of Environment on the Magnitude of Inbreeding Depression in Seed Germination in a Partially Self-Fertile Perennial Herb (Blandfordia grandiflora, Liliaceae). Ramsey M, Vaughton G, Int J Plant Sci 1998 159 1 98 104 10.1086/297525 (Pubitemid 28209396)
30. Effects of competition on lifetime estimates of inbreeding depression in the outcrossing plant Crepis sancta (Asteraceae). Cheptou, Imbert, Lepart, Escarre, J Evol Biol 2000 13 3 522 531 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2000.00175.x (Pubitemid 30300920)
31. Age-specific inbreeding depression and components of genetic variance in relation to the evolution of senescence. Charlesworth B, Hughes KA, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996 93 12 6140 6145 10.1073/pnas.93.12.6140 8650233 (Pubitemid 26190817)
32. What can genetic variation tell us about the evolution of senescence? Moorad JA, Promislow DEL, Proc R Soc B 2009 276 1665 2271 2278 10.1098/rspb.2009.0183 19324735
33. Inbreeding Depression and Male Survivorship in Drosophila: Implications for Senescence Theory. Swindell WR, Bouzat JL, Genetics 2006 172 1 317 327 16204222 (Pubitemid 43345494)
34. The Genetic Architecture of Life Span and Mortality Rates: Gender and Species Differences in Inbreeding Load of Two Seed-Feeding Beetles. Fox CW, Scheibly KL, Wallin WG, Hitchcock LJ, Stillwell RC, Smith BP, Genetics 2006 174 2 763 773 10.1534/genetics.106.060392 16888331 (Pubitemid 44656465)
35. Age specificity of inbreeding depression during a life cycle of Callosobruchus chinensis (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Tanaka Y, Res Popul Ecol 1990 32 2 329 335 10.1007/BF02512567
36. Inbreeding and Its Fitness Effects in an Insular Population of Song Sparrows (Melospiza melodia). Keller LF, Evolution 1998 52 1 240 250 10.2307/2410939 (Pubitemid 28195162)
37. Selection against inbred song sparrows during a natural population bottleneck. Keller LF, Arcese P, Smith JNM, Hochachka WM, Stearns SC, Nature 1994 372 6504 356 357 10.1038/372356a0 7969492 (Pubitemid 24363435)
38. Interactive effects of environmental stress and inbreeding on reproductive traits in a wild bird population. Marr AB, Arcese P, Hochachka WM, Reid JM, Keller LF, J Anim Ecol 2006 75 6 1406 1415 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006. 01165.x 17032373 (Pubitemid 44556462)
39. Environmental Conditions Affect the Magnitude of Inbreeding Depression in Survival of Darwin's Finches. Keller LF, Grant PR, Grant BR, Petren K, Evolution 2002 56 6 1229 1239 12144022 (Pubitemid 34792117)
40. Severe inbreeding depression in collared flycatchers (Ficedula albicollis). Kruuk LEB, Sheldon BC, Merila J, Proc R Soc B 2002 269 1500 1581 1589 10.1098/rspb.2002.2049 12184828
41. Evidence for a genetic basis of aging in two wild vertebrate populations. Wilson AJ, Nussey DH, Pemberton JM, Pilkington JG, Morris A, Pelletier F, Clutton-Brock TH, Kruuk LEB, Curr Biol 2007 17 24 2136 2142 10.1016/j.cub.2007. 11.043 18083516 (Pubitemid 50013974)
42. Estimating individual contributions to population growth: evolutionary fitness in ecological time. Coulson T, Benton TG, Lundberg P, Dall SRX, Kendall BE, Gaillard J-M, Proc R Soc B 2006 273 1586 547 555 10.1098/rspb.2005.3357 16537125 (Pubitemid 46768058)
43. Selection on mothers and offspring: Whose phenotype is it and does it matter? Wilson AJ, Pilkington JG, Pemberton JM, Coltman DW, Overall ADJ, Byrne KA, Kruuk LEB, Evolution 2005 59 2 451 463 15807429 (Pubitemid 40356056)
44. Inter- and intrasexual variation in aging patterns across reproductive traits in a wild red deer population. Nussey DH, Kruuk LEB, Morris A, Pemberton JM, Clutton-Brock TH, Am Nat 2009 174 3 342 357 10.1086/603615 19653847
45. Age and reproduction in birds - hypotheses and tests. Forslund P, Pärt T, TREE 1995 10 9 374 378 21237076
46. Age-Specific Reproductive Performance in Red-Billed Choughs Pyrrhocorax pyrrhocorax: Patterns and Processes in a Natural Population. Reid JM, Bignal EM, Bignal S, McCracken DI, Monaghan P, J Anim Ecol 2003 72 5 765 776 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00750.x (Pubitemid 37065132)
47. Microsatellites reveal heterosis in red deer. Coulson TN, Pemberton JM, Albon SD, Beaumont M, Marshall TC, Slate J, Guinness FE, Clutton-Brock TH, Proc R Soc B 1998 265 1395 489 495 10.1098/rspb.1998.0321 9569667 (Pubitemid 28140303)
48. Comparing molecular measures for detecting inbreeding depression. Slate J, Pemberton JM, J Evol Biol 2002 15 1 20 31 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2002.00373.x (Pubitemid 34175817)
49. Microsatellite loci reveal sex-dependent responses to inbreeding and outbreeding in red deer calves. Coulson T, Albon S, Slate J, Pemberton J, Evolution 1999 53 6 1951 1960 10.2307/2640453 (Pubitemid 30044825)
50. Inbreeding depression influences lifetime breeding success in a wild population of red deer (Cervus elaphus). Slate J, Kruuk LEB, Marshall TC, Pemberton JM, Clutton-Brock TH, Proc R Soc B 2000 267 1453 1657 1662 10.1098/rspb.2000.1192 11467429
51. Comparing parentage inference software: re-analysis of a red deer pedigree. Walling CA, Pemberton JM, Hadfield JD, Kruuk LEB, Mol Ecol 2010 19 1914 1928 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04604.x 20345675
52. Interactions Between Population-Density And Maternal Characteristics Affecting Fecundity And Juvenile Survival In Red Deer. Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Guinness FE, J Anim Ecol 1987 56 3 857 871 10.2307/4953
53. Red Deer: Behaviour and Ecology of Two Sexes. Clutton-Brock TH, Guinness FE, Albon SD, Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1982
54. Early Development And Population Dynamics In Red Deer.2. Density-Independent Effects And Cohort Variation. Albon SD, Clutton-Brock TH, Guinness FE, J Anim Ecol 1987 56 1 69 81 10.2307/4800
55. Estimating selection on neonatal traits in red deer using elasticity path analysis. Coulson T, Kruuk LEB, Tavecchia G, Pemberton JM, Clutton-Brock TH, Evolution 2003 57 12 2879 2892 14761065 (Pubitemid 38078367)
56. Comparative ungulate dynamics: the devil is in the detail. Clutton-Brock TH, Coulson T, Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B-Biol Sci 2002 357 1425 1285 1298 10.1098/rstb.2002.1128
57. An estimate of the multigenerational damage in man from data on consanguineous marriages. Morton NE, Crow JF, Muller HJ, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1956 11 856 863
58. Estimates of Lethal Equivalents and the Cost of Inbreeding in Mammals. Ralls K, Ballou JD, Templeton A, Conserv Biol 1988 2 2 185 193 10.1111/j.1523-1739.1988.tb00169.x
59. Estimating the prevalence of inbreeding from incomplete pedigrees. Marshall TC, Coltman DW, Pemberton JM, Slate J, Spalton JA, Guinness FE, Smith JA, Pilkington JG, Clutton-Brock TH, Proc R Soc B 2002 269 1500 1533 1539 10.1098/rspb.2002.2035 12184822
60. Intrinsic Parent-Offspring Correlation in Inbreeding Level in a Song Sparrow (Melospiza melodia) Population Open to Immigration. Reid JM, Arcese P, Keller LF, Am Nat 2006 168 1 1 13 10.1086/504852 (Pubitemid 44100593)
61. Early Development And Population Dynamics In Red Deer.1. Density-Dependent Effects On Juvenile Survival. Clutton-Brock TH, Major M, Albon SD, Guinness FE, J Anim Ecol 1987 56 1 53 67 10.2307/4799
62. Sex-differential effects of inbreeding on overwinter survival, birth date and mass of bighorn lambs. Rioux-Paquette E, Festa-Bianchet M, Coltman DW, J Evol Biol 2010 24 1 121 131 21044200
63. On the correlation between heterozygosity and fitness in natural populations. Hansson B, Westerberg L, Mol Ecol 2002 11 12 2467 2474 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01644.x 12453232 (Pubitemid 35436669)
64. The effect of drought stress on inbreeding depression in four populations of the Mediterranean outcrossing plant Crepis sancta (Asteraceae). Cheptou P-O, Berger A, Blanchard A, Collin C, Escarre J, Heredity 2000 85 3 294 302 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00759.x 11012734
65. Calving Times Of Red Deer (Cervus-Elaphus) On Rhum. Guinness FE, Gibson RM, Clutton-Brock TH, J Zool 1978 185 MAY 105 114
66. Gestation length variation in a wild ungulate. Clements MN, Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Pemberton JM, Kruuk LEB, Funct Ecol 2011 25 3 691 703 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01812.x
67. Early determinants of lifetime reproductive success differ between the sexes in red deer. Kruuk LEB, Clutton-Brock TH, Rose KE, Guinness FE, Proc R Soc B 1999 266 1429 1655 1661 10.1098/rspb.1999.0828 10501037 (Pubitemid 29417770)
68. How to separate genetic and environmental causes of similarity between relatives. Kruuk LEB, Hadfield JD, J Evol Biol 2007 20 1890 1903 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01377.x 17714306 (Pubitemid 47262852)
69. Inbreeding Depression in the Speke's Gazelle Captive Breeding Program. Kalinowski ST, Hedrick PW, Miller PS, Conserv Biol 2000 14 5 1375 1384 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98209.x
70. Genetic rescue and inbreeding depression in Mexican wolves. Fredrickson RJ, Siminski P, Woolf M, Hedrick PW, Proc R Soc B 2007 274 1623 2365 2371 10.1098/rspb.2007.0785 17609180 (Pubitemid 47372892)
71. Severe inbreeding depression in a wild wolf Canis lupus population. Liberg O, Andrén H, Pedersen H-C, Sand H, Sejberg D, Wabakken P, kesson M, Bensch S, Biol Lett 2005 1 1 17 20 10.1098/rsbl.2004.0266 17148117 (Pubitemid 41529973)
72. Reconciling the analysis of IBD and IBS in complex trait studies. Powell JE, Visscher PM, Goddard ME, Nat Rev Genet 2010 11 11 800 805 10.1038/nrg2865 20877324
73. On the use of large marker panels to estimate inbreeding and relatedness: empirical and simulation studies of a pedigreed zebra finch population typed at 771 SNPs. Santure AW, Stapley J, Ball AD, Birkhead TR, Burke T, Slate J, Mol Ecol 2010 19 7 1439 1451 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04554.x 20149098
74. Quantification of Inbreeding Due to Distant Ancestors and its Detection Using Dense SNP Data. Keller MC, Visscher PM, Goddard ME, Genetics 2011 189 237 249 10.1534/genetics.111.130922 21705750
75. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LEB, Pemberton JM, Mol Ecol 1998 7 5 639 655 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00374.x 9633105 (Pubitemid 28235973)
76. A retrospective assessment of the accuracy of the paternity inference program CERVUS. Slate J, Marshall T, Pemberton J, Mol Ecol 2000 9 6 801 808 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.00930.x 10849296 (Pubitemid 30354655)
77. Genetic Variation And Juvenile Survival In Red Deer. Pemberton JM, Albon SD, Guinness FE, Clutton-Brock TH, Berry RJ, Evolution 1988 42 5 921 934 10.2307/2408908 (Pubitemid 19325442)
78. Towards unbiased parentage assignment: combining genetic, behavioural and spatial data in a Bayesian framework. Hadfield JD, Richardson DS, Burke T, Mol Ecol 2006 15 12 3715 3730 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03050.x 17032269 (Pubitemid 44564280)
79. Parentage and Sibship Inference From Multilocus Genotype Data Under Polygamy. Wang J, Santure AW, Genetics 2009 181 4 1579 1594 10.1534/genetics. 108.100214 19221199
80. Antler size in red deer: Heritability and selection but no evolution. Kruuk LEB, Slate J, Pemberton JM, Brotherstone S, Guinness FE, Clutton-Brock TH, Evolution 2002 56 8 1683 1695 12353761
81. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Lynch A, Walsh B, Sunderland, MA 01375 U.S.A: Sinauer Associates Inc 1998
82. Coefficients of inbreeding and relationship. Wright S, Am Nat 1922 56 330 338 10.1086/279872
83. Population substructure, local density, and calf winter survival in red deer (Cervus elaphus). Coulson T, Albon S, Guinness F, Pemberton J, CluttonBrock T, Ecology 1997 78 3 852 863
84. Advancing breeding phenology in response to environmental change in a wild red deer population. Moyes K, Nussey DH, Clements MN, Guinness FE, Morris A, Morris S, Pemberton JM, Kruuk LEB, Clutton-Brock TH, Global Change Biol 2011 17 2455 2469 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02382.x
85. The costs of reproduction to red deer hinds. Clutton-Brock TH, Guinness FE, Albon SD, J Anim Ecol 1983 52 2 367 383 10.2307/4560 (Pubitemid 14273637)
86. The rate of senescence in maternal performance increases with early-life fecundity in red deer. Nussey DH, Kruuk LEB, Donald A, Fowlie M, Clutton-Brock TH, Ecol Lett 2006 9 12 1342 1350 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00989.x 17118008 (Pubitemid 44789726)
87. Inbreeding depression in conservation biology. Kalinowski ST, Hedrick PW, Annu Rev Ecol Syst 2000 31 139 162 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.139 (Pubitemid 32122398)
88. ASReml User Guide Release 3.0. Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ, Cullis BR, Thompson R, Hemel Hempstead, HP1 1ES, UK VSN International Ltd 2009 http://www.vsni.co.uk