Comparing parentage inference software: Reanalysis of a red deer pedigree

Molecular Ecology

Volumn 19, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1914-1928

  Walling, Craig A ^a   Pemberton, Josephine M ^a   Hadfield, Jarrod D ^a   Kruuk, Loeske E B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cervus; COLONY2; MasterBayes; Maternity; Microsatellite; Parentage analysis; Paternity

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DEER; FEMALE; GENETICS; MALE; PEDIGREE; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION GENETICS;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; DEER; FEMALE; GENETICS, POPULATION; MALE; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; MODELS, GENETIC; PEDIGREE; PHENOTYPE; SOFTWARE;

CERVUS; CERVUS ELAPHUS;

EID: 77951154678     PISSN: 09621083     EISSN: 1365294X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04604.x     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Arnold SJ, Wade MJ (1984) On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: Theory. Evolution, 38, 709 719.
2. Berger-Wolf TY, Sheikh SI, DasGupta B et al. (2007) Reconstructing sibling relationships in wild populations. Bioinformatics, 23, 149 156.
3. Blouin MS (2003) DNA-based methods for pedigree reconstruction and kinship analysis in natural populations. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18, 503 511.
4. Brommer JE, Kirkpatrick M, Qvarnström A, Gustafsson L (2007) The intersexual genetic correlation for lifetime fitness in the wild and its implications for sexual selection. PLoS ONE, 2, e744.
5. Buchanan FC, Crawford AM (1993) Ovine microsatellites at the OarFCB11, OarFCB128, OarFCB193, OarFCB266, and OarFCB304 loci. Animal Genetics, 24, 145.
6. Buchanan FC, Galloway SM, Crawford AM (1994) Ovine microsatellites at the Oarfcb5, Oarfcb19, Oarfcb20, Oarfcb48, Oarfcb129 and Oarfcb226 loci. Animal Genetics, 25, 60.
7. Butler K, Field C, Herbinger CM, Smith BR (2004) Accuracy, efficiency and robustness of four algorithms allowing full sibship reconstruction from DNA marker data. Molecular Ecology, 13, 1589 1600.
8. Charmantier AE, Réale D (2005) How do misassigned paternities affect the estimation of heritability in the wild? Molecular Ecology, 14, 2839 2850.
9. Clutton-Brock TH, Guinness FE, Albon SD (1982) Red Deer: Behaviour and Ecology of Two Sexes. University of Chicago Press
10. Clutton-Brock TH, Rose KE, Guinness FE (1997) Density-related changes in sexual selection in red deer. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 264, 1509 1516.
11. Coltman DW, Smith JA, Bancroft DR et al. (1999) Density-dependent variation in lifetime breeding success and natural and sexual selection in soay rams. The American Naturalist, 154, 730 746.
12. Coltman DW, O'Donoghue P, Hogg JT, Festa-Bianchet M (2005) Selection and Genetic (Co)Variance in Bighorn Sheep. Evolution, 59, 1372 1382.
13. Devlin B, Roeder K, Ellstrand NC (1988) Fractional pater-nity assignmnet - theoretical development and comparison to other methods. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 76, 369 380.
14. Ede AJ, Pierson CA, Crawford AM (1995) Ovine microsatellites at the OarCP9, OarCP16, OarCP20, OarCP21, OarCP23, OarCP26 loci. Animal Genetics, 26, 129 130.
15. Emery AM, Wilson IJ, Craig S, Boyle PR, Noble LR (2001) Assignment of paternity groups without access to parental genotypes: Multiple mating and developmental plasticity in squid. Molecular Ecology, 10, 1265 1278.
16. Georges M, Massey JM (1992) Polymorphic DNA markers in bovidae. World Intellectual Property Organisation
17. de Gortari MJ, Freking BA, Kappes SM et al. (1997) Extensive genomic conservation of cattle microsatellite heterozygosity in sheep. Animal Genetics, 28, 274 290.
18. Guinness FE, Gibson RM, Clutton-Brock TH (1978) Calving times of red deer (Cervus-Elaphus) on Rhum. Journal of Zoology, 185, 105 114.
19. Hadfield JD (2010) MCMC methods for multi-response generalised linear mixed models: The MCMCglmm R package. Journal of Statistical Software, 33, 1 22.
20. Hadfield JD, Richardson DS, Burke T (2006) Towards unbiased parentage assignment: combining genetic, behavioural and spatial data in a Bayesian framework. Molecular Ecology, 15, 3715 3730.
21. Johnson PCD, Hadfield JD, Webster LMI et al. (2009) Bayesian paternity analysis and mating patterns in a parasitic nematode, Trichostrongylus tenuis. Heredity, in press.
22. Jones AG, Ardren WR (2003) Methods of parentage analysis in natural populations. Molecular Ecology, 12, 2511 2523.
23. Jones AG, Small CM, Paczolt KA, Ratterman NL (2010) A practical guide to methods of parentage analysis. Molecular Ecology Resources, 10, 6 30.
24. Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC (2007) Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Molecular Ecology, 16, 1099 1106.
25. Koch M, Hadfield JD, Sefc KM, Sturmbauer C (2008) Pedigree reconstruction in wild cichlid fish populations. Molecular Ecology, 17, 4500 4511.
26. Kokko H, Mackenzie A, Reynolds JD, Lindström J, Sutherland WJ (1999) Measures of inequality are not equal. The American Naturalist, 154, 358 382.
27. Kruuk LEB, Hill WG (2008) Introduction. Evolutionary dynamics of wild populations: the use of long-term pedigree data. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 275, 593 596.
28. Kruuk LEB, Slate J, Pemberton JM et al. (2002) Antler size in red deer: heritability and selection but no evolution. Evolution, 56, 1683 1695.
29. Marshall TC (1998) Inbreeding and fitness in wild ungulates, PhD Dissertation. University of Edinburgh
30. Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LEB, Pemberton JM (1998) Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Molecular Ecology, 7, 639 655.
31. Morrissey MB, Wilson AJ, Pemberton JM, Ferguson MM (2007) A framework for power and sensitivity analyses for quantitative genetic studies of natural populations, and case studies in Soay sheep (Ovis aries). Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 20, 2309 2321.
32. Neff BD, Repka J, Gross MR (2001) A bayesian framework for parentage analysis: the value of genetic and other biological data. Theoretical Population Biology, 59, 315 331.
33. Nielsen R, Mattila DK, Clapham PJ, Palsbøll PJ (2001) Statistical approaches to paternity analysis in natural populations and applications to the north atlantic humpback whale. Genetics, 157, 1673 1682.
34. Pemberton JM (2008) Wild pedigrees: the way forward. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 275, 613 621.
35. Pemberton JM, Albon SD, Guinness FE, Clutton-Brock TH, Berry RJ (1988) Genetic variation and juvenile survival in red deer. Evolution, 42, 921 934.
36. Pemberton JM, Albon SD, Guinness FE, Clutton-Brock TH, Dover GA (1992) Behavioral estimates of male mating success tested By DNA fingerprinting in a polygynous mammal. Behavioral Ecology, 3, 66 75.
37. Pierson CA, Ede AJ, Crawford AM (1994) Ovine microsatellites at the Oarhh30, Oarhh51, Oarvh54, Oarcp88, Oarcp93, Oarcp134 Loci. Animal Genetics, 25, 294 295.
38. R Development Core Team (2009) R: A Language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing
39. Slate J, Marshall T, Pemberton J (2000) A retrospective assessment of the accuracy of the paternity inference program CERVUS. Molecular Ecology, 9, 801 808.
40. Swarbrick PA, Crawford AM (1992) Ovine dinucleotide repeat polymorphism at the Maf109 locus. Animal Genetics, 23, 84 84.
41. Thompson EA (1975) The estimation of pairwise relationship. Annals of Human Genetics, 39, 173 188.
42. Thompson EA (1976) Inference of genealogical structure. Social Science Information, 15, 477 526.
43. Vaiman D, Osta R, Mercier D, Grohs C, Leveziel H (1992) Characterization of 5 new bovine dinucleotide repeats. Animal Genetics, 23, 537 541.
44. Wang J (2004) Sibship reconstruction from genetic data with typing errors. Genetics, 166, 1963 1979.
45. Wang J, Santure AW (2009) Parentage and sibship inference from multilocus genotype data under polygamy. Genetics, 181, 1579 1594.
46. Wilson GA, Strobeck C, Wu L, Coffin JW (1997) Characterization of microsatellite loci in caribou Rangifer tarandus, and their use in other artiodactyls. Molecular Ecology, 6, 697 699.