A tale of two GTPases in cotranslational protein targeting

Protein Science

Volumn 20, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 1790-1795

  Saraogi, Ishu ^a   Akopian, David ^a   Shan, Shu Ou ^a  

^a California Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

GTPases; Molecular recognition and regulation; Protein interaction dynamics; Protein targeting and translocation; Signal recognition particle

Indexed keywords

GUANOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; SIGNAL RECOGNITION PARTICLE;

MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN TARGETING; REVIEW;

GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; GTP PHOSPHOHYDROLASES; GUANOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; HUMANS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; RECEPTORS, CYTOPLASMIC AND NUCLEAR; RECEPTORS, PEPTIDE; SIGNAL RECOGNITION PARTICLE;

EID: 80054725630     PISSN: 09618368     EISSN: 1469896X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pro.729     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Bourne HR, Sanders DA, McCormick F (1991) The GTPase superfamily: conserved structure and molecular mechanism. Nature 349:117-127. (Pubitemid 21912023)
2. Freymann DM, Keenan RJ, Stroud RM, Walter P (1997) Structure of the conserved GTPase domain of the signal recognition particle. Nature 385:361-364. (Pubitemid 27053109)
3. Jagath JR, Rodnina MV, Lentzen G, Wintermeyer W (1998) Interaction of guanine nucleotides with the signal recognition particle from Escherichia coli. Biochemistry 37:15408-15413. (Pubitemid 28516002)
4. Jagath JR, Rodnina MV, Wintermeyer W (2000) Conformational changes in the bacterial SRP receptor Ftsy upon binding of guanine nucleotides and SRP. J Mol Biol 295:745-753.
5. Peluso P, Shan S, Nock S, Herschlag D, Walter P (2001) Role of SRP RNA in the GTPase cycles of Ffh and Ftsy. Biochemistry 40:15224-15233. (Pubitemid 33151937)
6. Powers T, Walter P (1995) Reciprocal stimulation of GTP hydrolysis by two directly interacting GTPases. Science 269:1422-1424.
7. Gasper R, Meyer S, Gotthardt K, Sirajuddin M, Wittinghofer A (2009) It takes two to tango: regulation of G proteins by dimerization. Nature Rev Mol Cell Biol 10:423-429.
8. Pool MR (2005) Signal recognition particles in chloroplasts, bacteria, yeast and mammals. Mol Membr Biol 22:3-15.
9. Miller JD, Bernstein HD, Walter P (1994) Interaction of E. coli fFh/4.5S ribonucleoprotein and Ftsy mimics that of mammalian signal recognition particle and its receptor. Nature 367:657-659. (Pubitemid 24067710)
10. Padmanabhan W, Freymann DM (2001) The conformation of bound GMPPNP suggests a mechanism for gating the active site of the SRP GTPase site. Structure 9:859-863.
11. Reyes CL, Rutenber E, Walter P, Stroud RM (2007) X-ray structures of the signal recognition particle receptor reveal targeting cycle intermediates. PLoS One 2:e607.
12. Estrozi LF, Boehringer D, Shan S, Ban N, Schaffitzel C (2011) Cryo-EM structure of the E. coli translating ribosome in complex with SRP and its receptor. Nat Struct Mol Biol 18:88-90.
13. Zhang X, Kung S, Shan S (2008) Demonstration of a two-step mechanism for assembly of the SRP-SRP receptor complex: implications for the catalytic role of SRP RNA. J Mol Biol 38:1581-593.
14. Zhang X, Lam VQ, Mou Y, Kimura T, Chung J, Chandrasekar S, Winkler J, Mayo S, Shan S (2011) Direct visualization reveals dynamics of a transient intermediate during protein assembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:6450-6455.
15. Egea PF, Shan S, Napetschnig J, Savage DF, Walter P, Stroud RM (2004) Substrate twinning activates the signal recognition particle and its receptor. Nature 427:215-221. (Pubitemid 38112032)
16. Focia PJ, Shepotinovskaya IV, Seidler JA, Freymann DM (2004) Heterodimeric GTPase core of the SRP targeting complex. Science 303:373-377. (Pubitemid 38095777)
17. Shan S, Stroud R, Walter P (2004) Mechanism of association and reciprocal activation of two GTPases. PLoS Biol 2:e320.
18. Zhang X, Schaffitzel C, Ban N, Shan S (2009) Multiple conformational changes in a GTPase complex regulate protein targeting. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:1754-1759.
19. Shen K, Zhang X, Shan S (2011) Synergiestic action between the SRP RNA and translating ribosome allows efficient delivery of correct cargos during cotranslational protein targeting. RNA 17:892-902.
20. Zhang X, Rashid R, Wang K, Shan S (2010) Sequential checkpoints govern fidelity during cotranslational protein targeting. Science 328:757-760.
21. Lam VQ, Akopian D, Rome M, Shen Y, Henningsen D, Shan S (2010) Lipid activation of the SRP receptor provides spatial coordination of protein targeting. J Cell Biol 190:623-635.
22. Shan S, Chandrasekar S, Walter P (2007) Conformational changes in the GTPase modules of SRP and its receptor drive initiation of protein translocation. J Cell Biol 178:611-620. (Pubitemid 47267273)
23. Halic M, Blau M, Becker T, Mielke T, Pool MR, Wild K, Sinning I, Beckmann R (2006) Following the signal sequence from ribosomal tunnel exit to signal recognition particle. Nature 444:507-511. (Pubitemid 44809070)
24. Schaffitzel C, Oswald M, Berger I, Ishikawa T, Abrahams JP, Koerten HK, Koning RI, Ban N (2006) Structure of the E. coli signal recognition particle bound to a translating ribosome. Nature 444:503-506. (Pubitemid 44809069)
25. Attaide SF, Schmitz N, Shenk K, Ke A, Shan S, Doudna A, Ban N (2011) The crystal structure of the signal recognition particle in complex with its receptor. Science 381:881-886.
26. Kaiser CA, Preuss D, Grisafi P, Botstein D (1987) Many random sequences functionally replace the secretion signal sequence of yeast invertase. Science 235:312-317. (Pubitemid 17232556)
27. von Heijne G (1985) Signal sequences: the limits of variation. J Mol Biol 184:99-105.
28. Zheng N, Gierasch LM (1996) Signal sequences: the same yet different. Cell 86:849-852. (Pubitemid 26336788)