Docking and 3D-QSAR studies on the Ah receptor binding affinities of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) and dibenzofurans (PCDFs)

Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 478-485

  Li, Fei ^a   Li, Xuehua ^b   Liu, Xiaoli ^a,c   Zhang, Linbao ^a,c   You, Liping ^a,c   Zhao, Jianmin ^a   Wu, Huifeng ^a  

^a YANTAI INSTITUTE OF COASTAL ZONE RESEARCH   (China)

^b DALIAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

Author keywords

Dibenzo p dioxins (PCDDs); Dibenzofurans (PCDFs); Docking; Partial least squares; Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs); QSAR

Indexed keywords

AROMATIC HYDROCARBON RECEPTOR; POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYL; POLYCHLORINATED DIBENZODIOXIN; POLYCHLORINATED DIBENZOFURAN;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; HYDROGEN BOND; HYDROPHOBICITY; LIGAND BINDING; MOLECULAR DOCKING; MOLECULAR IMAGING; MOLECULAR MODEL; MOLECULAR SIZE; POLARIZATION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; RECEPTOR BINDING; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

BENZOFURANS; DIOXINS; HYDROGEN BONDING; HYDROPHOBIC AND HYDROPHILIC INTERACTIONS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; RECEPTORS, ARYL HYDROCARBON;

EID: 80054101103     PISSN: 13826689     EISSN: 18727077     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.etap.2011.09.001     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bandiera S., Sawyer T.W., Campbell M.A., Fujita T., Safe S. Competitive-binding to the cytosolic 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-para-dioxin receptor - effects of structure on the affinities of substituted halogenated biphenyls - a QSAR analysis. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1983, 32:3803-3813.
2. Chen J.W., Harner T., Ding G.H., Quan X., Schramm K.W., Kettrup A. Universal predictive models on octanol-air partition coefficients at different temperatures for persistent organic pollutants. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2004, 23:2309-2317.
3. Chovancova J., Kocan A., Jursa S. PCDDs, PCDFs and dioxin-like PCBs in food of animal origin (Slovakia). Chemosphere 2005, 61:1305-1311.
4. Denison M.S., Pandini A., Nagy S.R., Baldwin E.P., Bonati L. Ligand binding and activation of the Ah receptor. Chem-Biol. Interact. 2002, 141:3-24.
5. Domingo J.L., Bocio A. Levels of PCDD/PCDFs and PCBs in edible marine species and human intake: a literature review. Environ. Int. 2007, 33:397-405.
6. European Commission Enterprise & Industry Directorate General and Environment Directorate General. REACH in brief Available online at:. http://ecb.jrc.it/REACH/.
7. Eriksson L., Jaworska J., Worth A.P., Cronin M.T.D., McDowell R.M., Gramatica P. Methods for reliability and uncertainty assessment and for applicability evaluations of classification-and regression-based QSARs. Environ. Health Perspect. 2003, 111:1361-1375.
8. Giesy J.P., Hilscherova K., Jones P.D., Kannan K., Machala M. Cell bioassays for detection of aryl hydrocarbon (AhR) and estrogen receptor (ER) mediated activity in environmental samples. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2002, 45:3-16.
9. Golbraikh A., Tropsha A. Beware of q2!. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 2002, 20:269-276.
10. Hilscherova K., Machala M., Kannan K., Blankenship A.L., Giesy J.P. Cell bioassays for detection of aryl hydrocarbon (AhR) and estrogen receptor (ER) mediated activity in environmental samples. Environ. Sci. Pollut. R. 2000, 7:159-171.
11. Landers J.P., Bunce N.J. The Ah receptor and the mechanism of dioxin toxicity. Biochem. J. 1991, 276:273-287.
12. Li F., Li X.H., Shao J.P., Chi P., Chen J.W., Wang Z.J. Estrogenic activity of anthraquinone derivatives: in vitro and in silico studies. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2010, 23:1349-1355.
13. Li F., Xie Q., Li X.H., Li N., Chi P., Chen J.W., Wang Z.J., Hao C. Hormone activity of hydroxylated polybrominated diphenyl ethers on human thyroid receptor-beta: in vitro and in silico investigations. Environ. Health Perspect. 2010, 118:602-606.
14. Lucier G.W., Portier C.J., Gallo M.A. Receptor mechanisms and dose-response models for the effects of dioxins. Environ. Health Perspect. 1993, 101:36-44.
15. Mandal P.K. Dioxin: a review of its environmental effects and its aryl hydrocarbon receptor biology. J. Comp. Physiol. B: Biochem. Syst. Environ. Physiol. 2005, 175:221-230.
16. Mauri A., Consonni V., Pavan M., Todeschini R. Dragon software: an easy approach to molecular descriptor calculations. Match-Commun. Math. Co. 2006, 56:237-248.
17. Nebert D.W., Puga A., Vasiliou V. Role of the Ah receptor and the dioxin-inducible [Ah] gene battery in toxicity, cancer, and signal-transduction. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1993, 685:624-640.
18. Nie M.H., Blankenship A.L., Giesy J.P. Interactions between aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) and hypoxia signaling pathways. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2001, 10:17-27.
19. Niu J.F., Long X.X., Shi S.Q. Quantitative structure-activity relationships for prediction of the toxicity of hydroxylated and quinoid PCB metabolites. J. Mol. Model. 2007, 13:163-169.
20. OECD Guidance document on the validation of (Quantitative) Structure-Activity Relationships [(Q)SARs] Models. Available online at:. http://appli1.oecd.org/olis/2007doc.nsf/linkto/env-jm-mono(2007)2.
21. Ohura T., Morita M., Kuruto-Niwa R., Amagai T., Sakakibara H., Shimoi K. Differential action of chlorinated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on aryl hydrocarbon receptor-mediated signaling in breast cancer cells. Environ. Toxicol. 2010, 25:180-187.
22. Okey A.B., Riddick D.S., Harper P.A. The Ah receptor - mediator of the toxicity of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and related-compounds. Toxicol. Lett. 1994, 70:1-22.
23. Olivero-Verbel J., Vivas-Reyes R., Pacheco-Londono L., Johnson-Restrepo B., Kannan K. Discriminant analysis for activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor by polychlorinated naphthalenes. J. Mol. Struc.-Theochem. 2004, 678:157-161.
24. Pandini A., Denison M.S., Song Y.J., Soshilov A.A., Bonati L. Structural and functional characterization of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligand binding domain by homology modeling and mutational analysis. Biochemistry 2007, 46:696-708.
25. Poland A., Knutson J.C. 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-para-dioxin and related halogenated aromatic-hydrocarbons - examination of the mechanism of toxicity. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. 1982, 22:517-554.
26. Procopio M., Lahm A., Tramontano A., Bonati L., Pitea D. A model for recognition of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins by the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Eur. J. Biochem. 2002, 269:13-18.
27. Safe S. Polychlorinated-biphenyls (PCBs), dibenzo-para-dioxins (PCDDs), dibenzofurans (PCDFs), and related-compounds - environmental and mechanistic considerations which support the development of toxic equivalency factors (TEFs). Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 1990, 21:51-88.
28. Schüürmann G., Ebert R.U., Chen J.W., Wang B., Kuhne R. External validation and prediction employing the predictive squared correlation coefficient - test set activity mean vs training set activity mean. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2008, 48:2140-2145.
29. So S.S., Karplus M. Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationships from molecular similarity matrices and genetic neural networks. 2. Applications. J. Med. Chem. 1997, 40:4360-4371.
30. Todeschini R., Consonni V. Handbook of Molecular Descriptors 2000, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany.
31. Tuppurainen K., Ruuskanen J. Electronic eigenvalue (EEVA): a new QSAR/QSPR descriptor for electronic substituent effects based on molecular orbital energies. A QSAR approach to the Ah receptor binding affinity of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) and dibenzofurans (PCDFs). Chemosphere 2000, 41:843-848.
32. Villeneuve D.L., Khim J.S., Kannan K., Giesy J.P. Relative potencies of individual polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons to induce dioxinlike and estrogenic responses in three cell lines. Environ. Toxicol. 2002, 17:128-137.
33. Wagener M., Sadowski J., Gasteiger J. Autocorrelation of molecular-surface properties for modeling corticosteroid-binding globulin and cytosolic Ah receptor activity by neural networks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117:7769-7775.
34. Waller C.L., Mckinney J.D. Comparative molecular-field analysis of polyhalogenated dibenzo-p-dioxins, dibenzofurans, and biphenyls. J. Med. Chem. 1992, 35:3660-3666.
35. Wang Y., Chen J.W., Lin J., Wang Z., Bian H.T., Cai X.Y., Hao C. Combined experimental and theoretical study on photoinduced toxicity of an anthraquinone dye intermediate to Daphnia magna. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2009, 28:846-852.
36. Wang Y., Chen J.W., Ge L.K., Wang D.G., Cai X.Y., Huang L.P., Hao C. Experimental and theoretical studies on the photoinduced acute toxicity of a series of anthraquinone derivatives towards the water flea (Daphnia magna). Dyes Pigments 2009, 83:276-280.
37. Wold S., Sjostrom M., Eriksson L. PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. 2001, 58:109-130.
38. Zhang S.Y., Chen J.W., Qiao X.L., Ge L.k., Cai X.Y., Na G.S. Quantum chemical investigation and experimental verification on the aquatic photochemistry of the sunscreen 2-phenylbenzimidazole-5-sulfonic acid. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 2010:7484-7490.
39. Zhao Y.Y., Tao F.M., Zeng E.Y. Theoretical study of the quantitative structure-activity relationships for the toxicity of dibenzo-p-dioxins. Chemosphere 2008, 73:86-91.