Three force fields views of the 3 10 helix

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 101, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 1766-1771

  Patapati, Kalliopi K ^a   Glykos, Nicholas M ^a  

^a DEMOCRITUS UNIVERSITY OF THRACE   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PEPTIDE; PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL PHENOMENA; CHEMISTRY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE;

HYDROPHOBIC AND HYDROPHILIC INTERACTIONS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; PEPTIDES; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS;

EID: 80053373102     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: 15420086     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.08.044     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. C. Simmerling, B. Strockbine, and A.E. Roitberg All-atom structure prediction and folding simulations of a stable protein J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124 2002 11258 11259
2. P.L. Freddolino, and F. Liu K. Schulten Ten-microsecond molecular dynamics simulation of a fast-folding WW domain Biophys. J. 94 2008 L75 L77
3. D.L. Ensign, and V.S. Pande The Fip35 WW domain folds with structural and mechanistic heterogeneity in molecular dynamics simulations Biophys. J. 96 2009 L53 L55
4. J. Mittal, and R.B. Best Tackling force-field bias in protein folding simulations: folding of Villin HP35 and Pin WW domains in explicit water Biophys. J. 99 2010 L26 L28
5. D.E. Shaw, and P. Maragakis W. Wriggers Atomic-level characterization of the structural dynamics of proteins Science 330 2010 341 346
6. P.L. Freddolino, and S. Park K. Schulten Force field bias in protein folding simulations Biophys. J. 96 2009 3772 3780
7. R.B. Best, and J. Mittal Free-energy landscape of the GB1 hairpin in all-atom explicit solvent simulations with different force fields: similarities and differences Proteins 79 2011 1318 1328
8. S.J. Demarest, Y. Hua, and D.P. Raleigh Local interactions drive the formation of nonnative structure in the denatured state of human α-lactalbumin: a high resolution structural characterization of a peptide model in aqueous solution Biochemistry 38 1999 7380 7387
9. M. Araki, and A. Tamura Transformation of an α-helix peptide into a β-hairpin induced by addition of a fragment results in creation of a coexisting state Proteins 66 2007 860 868
10. A.D. MacKerell Jr., and D. Bashford M. Karplus All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins J. Phys. Chem. B 102 1998 3586 3616 (Pubitemid 128576688)
11. A.D. MacKerell Jr., M. Feig, and C.L. Brooks 3rd Extending the treatment of backbone energetics in protein force fields: limitations of gas-phase quantum mechanics in reproducing protein conformational distributions in molecular dynamics simulations J. Comput. Chem. 25 2004 1400 1415
12. W.L. Jorgensen, D.S. Maxwell, and J. Tirado-Rives Development and testing of the OPLS all-atom force field on conformational energetics and properties of organic liquids J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118 1996 11225 11236 (Pubitemid 26399746)
13. V. Hornak, and R. Abel C. Simmerling Comparison of multiple AMBER force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters Proteins 65 2006 712 725 (Pubitemid 44583220)
14. L. Wickstrom, A. Okur, and C. Simmerling Evaluating the performance of the ff99SB force field based on NMR scalar coupling data Biophys. J. 97 2009 853 856
15. K.K. Patapati, and N.M. Glykos Order through disorder: hyper-mobile C-terminal residues stabilize the folded state of a helical peptide. A molecular dynamics study PLoS ONE 5 2010 e15290
16. L. Kale, and R. Skeel K. Schulten NAMD2: greater scalability for parallel molecular dynamics J. Comput. Phys. 151 1999 283 312
17. W. Humphrey, A. Dalke, and K. Schulten VMD: visual molecular dynamics J. Mol. Graph. 14 1996 33 38 27-28 (Pubitemid 26152973)
18. D.A. Case, and T.E. Cheatham 3rd R.J. Woods The AMBER biomolecular simulation programs J. Comput. Chem. 26 2005 1668 1688 (Pubitemid 43076180)
19. N.M. Glykos Software news and updates. CARMA: a molecular dynamics analysis program J. Comput. Chem. 27 2006 1765 1768 (Pubitemid 44476671)
20. T. Ichiye, and M. Karplus Collective motions in proteins: a covariance analysis of atomic fluctuations in molecular dynamics and normal mode simulations Proteins 11 1991 205 217
21. A. Amadei, A.B.M. Linssen, and H.J.C. Berendsen Essential dynamics of proteins Proteins 17 1993 412 425 (Pubitemid 23358549)
22. Y. Mu, P.H. Nguyen, and G. Stock Energy landscape of a small peptide revealed by dihedral angle principal component analysis Proteins 58 2005 45 52 (Pubitemid 39665615)
23. A. Altis, and P.H. Nguyen G. Stock Dihedral angle principal component analysis of molecular dynamics simulations J. Chem. Phys. 126 2007 244111
24. D. Frishman, and P. Argos Knowledge-based protein secondary structure assignment Proteins 23 1995 566 579 (Pubitemid 26009520)
25. W. Kabsch, and C. Sander Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features Biopolymers 22 1983 2577 2637
26. R.A. Sayle, and E.J. Milner-White RASMOL: biomolecular graphics for all Trends Biochem. Sci. 20 1995 374 376
27. G.E. Crooks, and G. Hon S.E. Brenner WebLogo: a sequence logo generator Genome Res. 14 2004 1188 1190 (Pubitemid 38811555)
28. B. Zagrovic, and W.F. van Gunsteren Comparing atomistic simulation data with the NMR experiment: how much can NOEs actually tell us? Proteins 63 2006 210 218
29. D. Matthes, and B.L. de Groot Secondary structure propensities in peptide folding simulations: a systematic comparison of molecular mechanics interaction schemes Biophys. J. 97 2009 599 608