The Fip35 WW domain folds with structural and mechanistic heterogeneity in molecular dynamics simulations

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 96, Issue 8, 2009, Pages

  Ensign, Daniel L ^a   Pande, Vijay S ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN; PROTEIN FIP35; SOLVENT; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; BETA SHEET; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER MODEL; COMPUTER SYSTEM; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN MOTIF; SIMULATION; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; BAYES THEOREM; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; KINETICS; LETTER; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; STATISTICAL MODEL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VISCOSITY;

BAYES THEOREM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; KINETICS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; SOLVENTS; VISCOSITY;

EID: 67649412164     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: 15420086     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.01.024     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Liu, F., D. G. Du, A. A. Fuller, J. E. Davoren, P. Wipf, et al.. 2008. An experimental survey of the transition between two-state and downhill protein folding scenarios. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 105:2369-2374.
2. Borrell, B. 2008. Power Play. Nature. 451:240-243.
3. Hess, B., C. Kutzner, D. van der Spoel, and E. Lindahl. 2008. GROMACS 4: Algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 4:435-447.
4. Freddolino, P. L., F. Liu, M. Gruebele, and K. Schulten. 2008. Ten-microsecond molecular dynamics simulation of a fast-folding WW domain. Biophys. J. 94:L75-L77.
5. Shirts, M., and V. S. Pande. 2000. Computing - Screen savers of the world unite! Science. 290:1903-1904.
6. Friedrichs, M. S., P. Eastman, V. Vaidyanathan, M. Houston, S. Legrand, A. L. Beberg, D. L. Ensign, C. M. Bruns, and V. S. Pande. 2009. Accelerating molecular dynamic simulation on graphics processing units. J. Comp. Chem. 30:864-872.
7. Onufriev, A., D. Bashford, and D. A. Case. 2004. Exploring protein native states and large-scale conformational changes with a modified generalized born model. Proteins. 55:383-394.
8. van Gunsteren, W. F., and H. J. C. Berendsen. 1988. A leap-frog algorithm for stochastic dynamics. Mol. Simul. 1:173-185.
9. Rhee, Y. M., and V. S. Pande. 2008. Solvent viscosity dependence of the protein folding dynamics. J. Phys. Chem. B. 112:6221-6227.
10. Kabsch, W., and C. Sander. 1983. Dictionary of protein secondary structure - pattern-recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers. 22:2577-2637.
11. Zagrovic, B., and V. Pande. 2003. Solvent viscosity dependence of the folding rate of a small protein: Distributed computing study. J. Comput. Chem. 24:1432-1436.