Efficient characterization of high-dimensional parameter spaces for systems biology

BMC Systems Biology

Volumn 5, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Zamora Sillero, Elías ^a,b,c   Hafner, Marc ^a,c,d   Ibig, Ariane ^b,c   Stelling, Joerg ^b,c   Wagner, Andreas ^a,c,e,f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c SWISS INSTITUTE OF BIOINFORMATICS   (Switzerland)

^d EPFL   (Switzerland)

^e SANTA FE INSTITUTE   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BIOCHEMISTRY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGICAL RHYTHM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; METHODOLOGY; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PHYSIOLOGY; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

ALGORITHMS; BIOCHEMICAL PROCESSES; BIOLOGICAL CLOCKS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

EID: 80052867973     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17520509     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1752-0509-5-142     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Ideker T, Galitski T, Hood L. A new approach to decoding life: Systems biology. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 2001, 2:343-372. 10.1146/annurev.genom.2.1.343, 11701654.
2. Palsson B. Systems biology: Properties of Reconstructed Networks 2006, New York: Cambridge University Press.
3. Goodsell D. Our Molecular Nature: The Body's Motors, Machines and Messages 1963, New York: Copernicus.
4. Goodsel D. The Machinery of Life 1993, New York: Springer-Verlag.
5. Stelling J, Sauer U, Szallasi Z, Doyle FJ, Doyle J. Robustness of cellular functions. Cell 2004, 118:675-685. 10.1016/j.cell.2004.09.008, 15369668.
6. Chaves M, Sengupta A, Sontag E. Geometry and topology of parameter space: investigating measures of robustness in regulatory networks. J Math Biol 2009, 59:315-358. 10.1007/s00285-008-0230-y, 3034167, 18987858.
7. Dayarian A, Chaves M, Sontag E, Sengupta A. Shape, Size, and Robustness: Feasible Regions in the Parameter Space of Biochemical Networks. PLoS Comp Biol 2009, 5:e1000256.
8. Moronashi M, Winn A, Borisuk M, Bolouri H, Doyle J, Kitano H. Robustness as a Measure of Plausibility in Models of Biochemical Networks. J theor Biol 2002, 216:19-30. 10.1006/jtbi.2002.2537, 12076125.
9. Wagner A. Robustness and Evolvability in Living Systems 2005, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
10. Gonze D, Halloy J, Goldbeter A. Robustness of circadian rhythms with respect to molecular noise. PNAS 2002, 99:673-678. 10.1073/pnas.022628299, 117364, 11792856.
11. Gonze D, Goldbeter A. Circadian rhythms and molecular noise. Chaos 2006, 16:26110.
12. Zak DE, Stelling J, Doyle FJ. Sensitivity analysis of oscillatory (bio)chemical systems. Computers and Chemical Engineering 2005, 29:663-673.
13. Leloup JC, Goldbeter A. Chaos and biorhythmicity in a model for circadian oscillations of the per and tim proteins in drosophilia. J theor Biol 1999, 198:445-459. 10.1006/jtbi.1999.0924, 10366496.
14. Ma L, Iglesias PA. Quantifying robustness of biochemical network models. BMC Bioinformatics 2002, 3:38. 10.1186/1471-2105-3-38, 139978, 12482327.
15. Leloup JC, Goldbeter A. Modeling the mammalian circadian clock: Sensitivity analysis and multiplicity of oscillatory mechanisms. J theor Biol 2004, 230:541-562. 10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.04.040, 15363675.
16. Battotokh D, Tyson JJ. Bifurcation analysis of a model of the budding yeast cell cycle. Chaos 2004, 14:653-661. 10.1063/1.1780011, 15446975.
17. Stelling J, Gilles ED, Doyle FJ. Robustness properties of circadian clock architectures. PNAS 2004, 101:13210-13215. 10.1073/pnas.0401463101, 516549, 15340155.
18. Tsumotoa K, Yoshinaga T, Iida H, Kawakami H, Aihara K. Bifurcations in a mathematical model for circadian oscillations of clock genes. J theor Biol 2006, 239:101-122. 10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.07.017, 16143345.
19. Saithong T, Painter KJ, Millar AJ. Consistent Robustness Analysis (CRA) Identifies Biologically Relevant Properties of Regulatory Network Models. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e15589. 10.1371/journal.pone.0015589, 3002950, 21179566.
20. Hafner M, Koeppl H, Hasler M, Wagner A. "Glocal" Robustness Analysis and Model Discrimination for Circadian Oscillators. PLoS Comput Biol 2009, 5:e1000534. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000534, 2758577, 19834597.
21. Barkai N, Leibler S. Robustness in simple biochemical networks. Nature 1997, 387:913-917. 10.1038/43199, 9202124.
22. von Dassow G, Meir E, Munro EM, Odell GM. The segment polarity network is a robust developmental module. Nature 2000, 406:188-192. 10.1038/35018085, 10910359.
23. Blüthgen N, Herzel H. How robust are switches in intracellular signaling cascades?. J theor Biol 2003, 225:293-300. 10.1016/S0022-5193(03)00247-9, 14604583.
24. Wagner A. Cicuit topology and the evolution of robustness in two-gene circadian oscillators. PNAS 2005, 102:11775-11780. 10.1073/pnas.0501094102, 1183445, 16087882.
25. Zhang J, Yuan Z, Xiong H, Zhou T. Architecture-Dependent Robustness and Bistability in a Class of Genetic Circuits. Biophysical Journal 2010, 99:1034-1042. 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.05.036, 2920723, 20712986.
26. Powell W. Approximate Dynamic Programming: Solving the Curses of Dimensionality 2007, Hoboken: Wiley.
27. Tyson JJ, Chen KC, Novak B. Sniffers, buzzers, toggles and blinkers: dynamics of regulatory and signaling pathways in the cell. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2003, 5:221-231.
28. Novak B, Tyson JJ. Design principles of biochemical oscillators. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2008, 9:981-991. 10.1038/nrm2530, 2796343, 18971947.
29. Cheng P, Yang Y, Liu Y. Interlocked feedback loops contribute to the robustness of the Neurospora circadian clock. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001, 98:7408-7413. 10.1073/pnas.121170298, 34682, 11416214.
30. Tsai T, Choi YS, Ma W, Pomerening JR, Tang C, Jr JEF. Robust, Tunable Biological Oscillations from Interlinked Positive and Negative Feedback Loops. Science 2008, 321:126-129. 10.1126/science.1156951, 2728800, 18599789.
31. Saithong T, Painter KJ, Millar AJ. The Contributions of Interlocking Loops and Extensive Nonlinearity of Circadian Clock Models. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e13867. 10.1371/journal.pone.0013867, 2994703, 21152419.
32. Trane C. Robustness Analysis of Intracellular Oscillators with Application to the Circadian Clock. PhD thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Automatic Control Lab 2009,
33. Metropolis N, Rosenbluth AW, Rosenbluth MN, Teller AH, Teller E. Equation of state calculation by fast computing machines. J Chem Phys 1953, 21:1087-1092.
34. Landau L, Lifshitz E. Fisica Estadistica 1969, Barcelona: Reverte.
35. Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt C, Vecchi M. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 1983, 220:671-680. 10.1126/science.220.4598.671, 17813860.
36. Newman JEM, Barkema GT. Monte Carlo Methods in Statistical Physics 1999, New York: Oxford University Press.
37. Battogtokh D, Asch DK, Case ME, Arnold J, Schüttler HB. An ensemble method for identifying regulatory circuits with special reference to the qa gene cluster of Neurospora crassa. PNAS 2002, 99:16904-16909. 10.1073/pnas.262658899, 139242, 12477937.
38. Yu Y, Dong W, Altimus C, Tang X, Griffith J, Morello M, Dudek L, Arnold J, Schüttler HB. A genetic network for the clock of Neurospora crassa. PNAS 2007, 10:2809-2814.
39. Dong W, Tang X, Yu Y, Nilsen R, Kim R, Griffith J, Arnold J, Schüttler HB. Systems Biology of the Clock in Neurospora crassa. PLoS ONE 2008, 3:e3105. 10.1371/journal.pone.0003105, 2518617, 18769678.
40. Brown KS, Sethna JP. Statistical mechanical approaches to models with many poorly known parameters. Phys Rev E 2003, 68:021904.
41. Brown KS, Hill CC, Calero GA, Myers CR, Lee KH, Sethna JP, Cerione RA. The statistical mechanics of complex signaling networks: nerve growth factor signaling. Phys Biol 2004, 1:184-195. 10.1088/1478-3967/1/3/006, 16204838.
42. Ingber L. Adaptive simulated annealing (ASA): Lessons learned. Control and Cybernetics 1996, 25:33-54.
43. Ashyraliyev M, Fomekong-Nanfack Y, Kaandorp J. Systems biology: Parameter estimation for biochemical models. FEBS Journal 2009, 276:886-902. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06844.x, 19215296.
44. Marinari E, Parisi G. Simulated tempering: A new Monte Carlo scheme. Europhysics Letters 1992, 19:451-458.
45. Geyer C, Thompson E. Annealing Markov chain Monte Carlo with applications to ancestral inference. J Amer Statistical Assoc 1995, 90:909-920.
46. Andrieu C, Thoms J. A tutorial on adaptive MCMC. Stat Comput 2008, 18:343-373.
47. Khachiyan L. Rounding of polytopes in the real number model of computation. Mathematics of Operations Research 1996, 21:307-320.
48. Schwaab M, Biscaia EC, Monteiro J, Pinto J. Nonlinear parameter estimation through particle swarm optimization. Chem Eng Sci 2008, 63:1542-1552.
49. Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WS, Flannery BP. Numerical Recipes in C 1992, New York: Cambridge University Press.
50. Eissing T, Allgöwer F, Bullinger E. Robustness properties of apoptosis models with respect to parameter variations and intrinsic noise. IEE Proc-Syst Biol 2005, 152:221-228.
51. Hafner M, Koeppl H, Wagner A. Evolution of feedback loops in oscillatory systems. Third International Conference on Fundations of Systems Biology in Enginnering, (arXiv.1003.1231v1 [q-bio.QM]) 2009,
52. Hodgkin AL, Huxley F. A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J Physiol 1952, 117:500-544. 1392413, 12991237.
53. Meyer T, Stryer L. Molecular model for receptor-stimulated calcium spiking. PNAS 1988, 85:5051-5055. 10.1073/pnas.85.14.5051, 281685, 2455890.
54. Pomenenring JR, Sontag ED, Ferrell JE. Building a cell cycle oscillator: hysteresis and bistability in the activation of Cdc2. Nat Cell Biol 2003, 5:346-351. 10.1038/ncb954, 12629549.
55. Vilar J, Kueh H, Barkai N, Lieber S. Mechanism of noise-resistance in genetic oscillators. PNAS 2002, 99:5988-5992. 10.1073/pnas.092133899, 122889, 11972055.
56. Novak B, Tyson J. Numerical analysis of a comprehensive model of M-phase control in Xenopus oocyte extracts and intact embryos. J Cell Sci 1993, 106:1153-1168.
57. Klipp E, Herwig R, Kowald A, Wierling C, Lehrach H. Systems biology in practice 2006, Weinheim: Wiley-vch.
58. Lee K, Loros J, Dunlap JC. Interconnected feedback loops in the Neurospora circadian system. Science 2000, 289:107-110. 10.1126/science.289.5476.107, 10884222.
59. Gallego M, Virshup DM. Post-translational modifications regulate the ticking of the circadian clock. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007, 8:139-148.
60. Rust MJ, Markson JS, Lane WS, Lane DS, Fisher DS, O'Shea EK. Ordered Phosphorylation Governs Oscillation of a Three-Protein Circadian Clock. Science 2007, 318:809-812. 10.1126/science.1148596, 2427396, 17916691.
61. Bunger MK, Wilsbacher LD, Moran SM, Clendenin C, Radcliffe LA, Hogenesch JB, Simon MC, Takahashi JS, Bradfield CA. Mop3 is an essential component of the master circadian pacemaker in mammals. Cell 2000, 103:1009-1017. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00205-1, 11163178.
62. Smolen P, Baxter D, Byrne JH. Modeling circadian oscillations with interlocking positive and negative feedback loops. The Journal of Neuroscience 2001, 21:6644-6656.
63. Smolen P, Baxte D, Byrne JH. A reduced model clarifies the role of feedback loops and time Delays in Drosophila circadian oscillator. J Biophys 2002, 86:2786-2802.
64. Becker-Weimann S, Wolf J, Herzel H, Kramer A. Modeling Feedback loops of the Mammalian Circadian Oscillator. J Biophys 2004, 87:3023-3034.
65. Locke JCL, Southern MM, Kozma-Bognar L, Hibberd V, Brown PE, Turner MS, Millar AJ. Extension of a genetic network model by iterative experimentation and mathematical analysis. Molecular Systems Biology 2005, 1.
66. Gutenkunst RN, Waterfall JJ, Casey FP, Brown KS, Myers CR, Sethna JP. Universally sloppy parameter sensitivities in systems biology models. PLoS Comput Biol 2007, 3:e189.
67. Mortensen JJ, Kaasbjerg K, Frederiksen SL, Nørskov JK, Sethna JP, Jacobsen KW. Bayesian Error Estimation in Density-Functional Theory. Phys Rev Lett 2005, 95:216401.