Group selection and kin selection: Formally equivalent approaches

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 26, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 325-332

  Marshall, James A R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTIONARY THEORY; FITNESS; GROUP SELECTION; KIN SELECTION; LITERATURE REVIEW; NUMERICAL MODEL; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; EVOLUTION; GENETIC SELECTION; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS; REVIEW; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; GENETIC FITNESS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SELECTION, GENETIC; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 80052860961     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.04.008     Document Type: Review

References (96)

1. Hamilton W.D. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. J. Theor. Biol. 1964, 7:17-52.
2. Hamilton W.D. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. J. Theor. Biol. 1964, 7:1-16.
3. Bourke A.F.G., Franks N.R. Social Evolution in Ants 1995, Princeton University Press.
4. Foster K.R., Ratnieks F.L.W. Facultative worker policing in a wasp. Nature 2000, 407:692-693.
5. Wenseleers T., Ratnieks F.L.W. Comparative analysis of worker reproduction and policing in eusocial Hymenoptera supports relatedness theory. Am. Nat. 2006, 168:163-179.
6. Boomsma J.J. Kin selection versus sexual selection: why the ends do not meet. Curr. Biol. 2007, 17:R673-R683.
7. Hughes W.O.H., et al. Ancestral monogamy shows kin selection is key to the evolution of eusociality. Science 2008, 320:1213-1216.
8. Cornwallis C.K., et al. Promiscuity and the evolutionary transition to complex societies. Nature 2010, 466:969-972.
9. Williams G.C. Adaptation and Natural Selection 1966, Princeton University Press.
10. Hamilton W.D. Innate social aptitudes of man: an approach from evolutionary genetics. Biosoc. Anthropol. 1975, 133-155.
11. Nowak M.A., et al. The evolution of eusociality. Nature 2010, 466:1057-1062.
12. Abbott P. Inclusive fitness theory eusociality. Nature 2011, 471:E1-E4.
13. Boomsma J.J., et al. Only full-sibling families evolved eusociality. Nature 2011, 471:E4-E5.
14. Strassmann J.E., et al. Kin selection and eusociality. Nature 2011, 471:E5-E6.
15. Ferriere R., Michod R.E. Inclusive fitness in evolution. Nature 2011, 471:E6-E8.
16. Herre E.A., Wcislo W.T. In defence of inclusive fitness theory. Nature 2011, 471:E8-E9.
17. Nowak M.A., et al. Nowak et al. Reply. Nature 2011, 471:E9-E10.
18. Okasha S. Altruism researchers must cooperate. Nature 2010, 467:653-655.
19. van Veelen M. Group selection, kin selection, altruism and cooperation: when inclusive fitness is right and when it can be wrong. J. Theor. Biol. 2009, 259:589-600.
20. Traulsen A Mathematics of kin- and group-selection: formally equivalent?. Evolution 2010, 64:316-323.
21. Okasha S. Evolution and the Levels of Selection 2006, Oxford University Press.
22. Gardner A., Foster K.R. The evolution and ecology of cooperation - history and concepts. Ecol. Soc. Evol. 2008, 1-36.
23. Foster K.R. A defense of sociobiology. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 2009, 74:403-418.
24. Darwin C. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex 1871, John Murray.
25. Maynard Smith J. Group selection and kin selection. Nature 1964, 201:1145-1146.
26. Price G.R. Extension of covariance selection mathematics. Ann. Hum. Genet. 1972, 35:485-490.
27. Wilson D.S. A theory of group selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1975, 72:143-146.
28. Dawkins R. The Selfish Gene 1976, Oxford University Press.
29. Price G.R. Selection and covariance. Nature 1970, 227:520-521.
30. Queller D.C. A general model for kin selection. Evolution 1992, 46:376-380.
31. Gardner A., et al. The relation between multilocus population genetics and social evolution theory. Am. Nat. 2007, 169:207-226.
32. Gardner A., et al. The genetical theory of kin selection. J. Evol. Biol. 2011, 24:1020-1043.
33. Queller D.C. Kinship, reciprocity and synergism in the evolution of social behaviour. Nature 1985, 318:366-367.
34. Smith J., et al. A generalization of Hamilton's rule for the evolution of microbial cooperation. Science 2010, 328:1700-1703.
35. Rousset F. Genetic Structure and Selection in Subdivided Populations 2004, Princeton University Press.
36. Hauert C., et al. Synergy and discounting of cooper ation in social dilemmas. J. Theor. Biol. 2006, 239:195-202.
37. Marshall J.A.R. Queller's rule OK: comment on van Veelen 'when inclusive fitness is right and when it can be wrong'. J. Theor. Biol. 2010, 270:185-188.
38. Ohtsuki H. Evolutionary games in Wright's island model: kin selection meets evolutionary game theory. Evolution 2010, 64:3344-3353.
39. Grafen A. A geometric view of relatedness. Oxford Surveys Evol. Biol. 1985, 2:28-89.
40. Gardner A., West S.A. Greenbeards. Evolution 2010, 64:25-38.
41. Grafen A. The hawk-dove game played between relatives. Anim. Behav. 1979, 27:905-907.
42. Lehmann L., Keller L. The evolution of cooperation and altruism - a general frame work and a classification of models. J. Evol. Biol. 2006, 19:1365-1376.
43. Grafen A. Various remarks on Lehmann and Keller's article. J. Evol. Biol. 2006, 19:1397-1399.
44. Fisher R.A. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection 1930, Clarendon Press.
45. Metz J.A.J., et al. How should we define 'fitness' for general ecological scenarios?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1992, 7:198-202.
46. Roff D.A. Defining fitness in evolutionary models. J. Genet. 2008, 87:339-348.
47. Taylor P.D. Altruism in viscous populations an inclusive fitness model. Evol. Ecol. 1992, 6:352-356.
48. Queller D.C. Genetic relatedness in viscous populations. Evol. Ecol. 1994, 8:70-73.
49. Grafen A., Archetti M. Natural selection of altruism in inelastic viscous homogeneous populations. J. Theor. Biol. 2008, 252:694-710.
50. Van Dyken J.D. The components of kin competition. Evolution 2010, 64:2840-2854.
51. Ohtsuki H., Nowak M.A. Evolutionary games on cycles. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2006, 273:2249-2256.
52. Grafen A. An inclusive fitness analysis of altruism on a cyclical network. J. Evol. Biol. 2007, 20:2278-2283.
53. Wilson D.S., et al. Can altruism evolve in purely viscous populations?. Evol. Ecol. 1992, 6:331-341.
54. Taylor P.D. Inclusive fitness in a homogeneous environment. Proc. R. Soc. Ser. B: Biol. Sci. 1992, 249:299-302.
55. Platt T.G., Bever J.D. Kin competition and the evolution of cooperation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2009, 24:370-377.
56. Breden F. Partitioning of covariance as a method for studying kin selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1990, 5:224-228.
57. Queller D.C. Quantitative genetics, inclusive fitness, and group selection. Am. Nat. 1992, 139:540-558.
58. Grafen A. Hamilton's rule OK. Nature 1985, 318:310-311.
59. Killingback T., et al. Evolution in group-structured populations can re solve the tragedy of the commons. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2006, 273:1477-1481.
60. Traulsen A., Nowak M.A. Evolution of cooperation by multilevel selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:10952-10955.
61. Ohtsuki H., et al. A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks. Nature 2006, 441:502-505.
62. Marshall J.A.R. Ultimate causes and the evolution of altruism. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2010, 1-10.
63. Lehmann L., et al. Group selection and kin selection: two concepts but one process. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:6736-6739.
64. Grafen A. Detecting kin selection at work using inclusive fitness. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2007, 274:713-719.
65. Lehmann L., et al. The evolution of helping and harming on graphs: the return of the inclusive fitness effect. J. Evol. Biol. 2007, 20:2284-2295.
66. Wild G., et al. Adaptation and the evolution of parasite virulence in a connected world. Nature 2009, 459:983-986.
67. Wade M.J., et al. Multilevel and kin selection in a connected world. Nature 2010, 463:E8-E9.
68. Wild G., et al. Wild Gardner & West reply. Nature 2010, 463:E9-E10.
69. Wade M.J. Soft selection, hard selection, kin selection, and group selection. Am. Nat. 1985, 125:61-73.
70. Wade M.J. Kin selection: its components. Science 1980, 210:665.
71. Queller D.C. Group selection and kin selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1991, 6:64.
72. Frank S.A. Foundations of Social Evolution 1998, Princeton University Press.
73. Wilson E.O., Hölldobler B. Eusociality: origin and consequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102:13367-13371.
74. Wilson E.O. Kin selection as the key to altruism: its rise and fall. Soc. Res. 2005, 72:159-166.
75. Thompson G.J. Kin selection in disguise?. Insectes Sociaux 2006, 53:496-497.
76. Foster K.R., et al. Kin selection is the key to altruism. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2006, 21:57-60.
77. Oster G.F., Wilson E.O. Caste and Ecology in the Social Insects 1978, Princeton University Press.
78. Ratnieks F.L.W. Reproductive harmony via mutual policing by workers in eusocial Hymenoptera. Am. Nat. 1988, 132:217-236.
79. West S.A., et al. Social semantics: altruism, cooperation, mutualism, strong reciprocity and group selection. J. Evol. Biol. 2007, 20:415-432.
80. West S.A, et al. Social semantics: how useful has group selection been?. J. Evol. Biol. 2008, 21:374-385.
81. Lion S., et al. Evolution in structured populations: beyond the kin versus group debate. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2011, 26:193-201.
82. Hamilton W.D. Selfish and spiteful behaviour in an evolutionary model. Nature 1970, 228:1218-1220.
83. Weiss N.A., et al. A Course in Probability 2005, Pearson Addison-Wesley.
84. Gardner A., Grafen A. Capturing the superorganism: a formal theory of group adaptation. J. Evol. Biol. 2009, 22:659-671.
85. McGlothlin J.W., et al. Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process. III. Social evolution. Evolution 2010, 64:2558-2574.
86. Taylor P.D., Frank S.A. How to make a kin selection model. J. Theor. Biol. 1996, 180:27-37.
87. Taylor P.D., et al. Direct fitness or inclusive fitness: how shall we model kin selection?. J. Evol. Biol. 2007, 20:301-309.
88. Grafen A. Optimization of inclusive fitness. J. Theor. Biol. 2006, 238:541-563.
89. Grafen A. Formalizing Darwinism and inclusive fitness theory. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Ser. B: Biol. Sci. 2009, 364:3135-3141.
90. Gardner A. Adaptation as organism design. Biol. Lett. 2009, 5:861-864.
91. Dawkins R. Twelve misunderstandings of kin selection. Zeitschrift Tierpsychologie 1979, 51:184-200.
92. Gardner A. The Price equation. Curr. Biol. 2008, 18:R198-R202.
93. Taylor P.D., et al. Evolution of cooperation in a finite homogeneous graph. Nature 2007, 447:469-472.
94. Taylor P.D. Inclusive fitness arguments in genetic models of behaviour. J. Math. Biol. 1996, 34:654-674.
95. Wenseleers T., et al. Social evolution theory: a review of methods and approaches. Social Behaviour: Genes, Ecology and Evolution 2010, 132-158. Cambridge University Press. T. Székely (Ed.).
96. Queller D.C. Kinship is relative. Nature 2004, 430:975-976.