Direct fitness or inclusive fitness: How shall we model kin selection?

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 301-309

  Taylor, P D ^a   Wild, G ^a   Gardner, A ^a  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Class structure; Hamilton's rule; Price equation; Relatedness; Reproductive value

Indexed keywords

INCLUSIVE FITNESS; KIN SELECTION; NUMERICAL MODEL; REPRODUCTIVE COST;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COOPERATION; EVOLUTION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; POPULATION GENETICS; REPRODUCTION; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; THEORETICAL MODEL;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; EVOLUTION; GENETICS, POPULATION; MODELS, THEORETICAL; REPRODUCTION; SELECTION (GENETICS); SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 33845688657     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01196.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Cheverud, J.M. 1984. Evolution by kin selection: a quantitative genetic model illustrated by maternal performance in mice. Evolution 38: 766-777.
2. Day, T. 2001. Population structure inhibits evolutionary diversi-fication under resource competition. Genetica 112-113: 71-86.
3. Frank, S.A. 1997. Multivariate analysis of correlated selection and kin selection, with an ESS maximization method. J. Theor. Biol. 189: 307-316.
4. Frank, S.A. 1998. Foundations of Social Evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
5. Gandon, S. 1999. Kin competition, the cost of inbreeding and the evolution of dispersal. J. Theor. Biol. 200: 345-364.
6. Gardner, A. & West, S.A. 2006. Demography, altruism, and the benefits of budding. J. Evol. Biol. (in press).
7. Grafen, A. 1985a. Hamilton's rule ok. Nature 318: 310-311.
8. Grafen, A. 1985b. A geometric view of relatedness. Oxford Surv. Evol. Biol. 2: 28-89.
9. Grafen, A. 1999. Formal Darwinism, the individual-as-maximizing agent analogy and bet-hedging. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266: 799-803.
10. Fisher, R. A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
11. Hamilton, W.D. 1964. The genetical evolution of social behaviour, I and II. J. Theor. Biol. 7: 1-52.
12. Hamilton, W.D. 1971. Selection of selfish and altruistic behaviour in some extreme models. In: Man and Beast: Comparative Social Behavior (J. F. Eisenberg & W. S. Dillon, eds), pp. 59-91. Smithsonian Institute Press, Washington, DC.
13. Leturque, H. & Rousset, F. 2002. Dispersal, kin competition, and the ideal free distribution in a spatially heterogeneous population. Theor. Popul. Biol. 62: 169-180.
14. Leturque, H. & Rousset, F. 2003. Joint evolution of sex ratio and dispersal: conditions for higher dispersal rates from good habitats. Evol. Ecol. 17: 67-84.
15. Michod, R.E. & Hamilton, W.D. 1980. Coefficients of relatedness in sociobiology. Nature 288, 694-697.
16. Orlove, M.J. & Wood, C.L. 1978. Coefficients of relationship and coefficients of relatedness in kin selection: a covariance form for the rho formula. J. Theor. Biol. 73: 679-686.
17. Pen, I. 2006. When boys want to be girls: effects of mating system and dispersal on parent-offspring sex ratio conflict. Evol. Ecol. Res. 8: 103-113.
18. Pen, I. & Taylor, P.D. 2005. Modeling information exchange in worker-queen conflict over sex allocation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 272: 2403-2408.
19. Perrin, N. & Mazalov, V. 2000. Local competition, inbreeding, and the evolution of sex-biased dispersal. Am. Nat. 155: 116-127.
20. Price, G.R. 1970. Selection and covariance. Nature 227: 520-521.
21. Price, G.R. & Smith, C.A.B. 1972. Fisher's Malthusian parameter and reproductive value. Ann. Hum. Genet. 36: 1-7.
22. Queller, D.C. 1985. Kinship, reciprocity and synergism in the evolution of social behaviour. Nature 318, 366-367.
23. Queller, D.C. 1992. A general model for kin selection. Evolution 46: 376-380.
24. Rousset, F. 2004. Genetic Structure and Selection in Subdivided Populations. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
25. Seger, J. 1981. Kinship and covariance. J. Theor. Biol. 91: 191-213.
26. Taylor, P.D. 1990. Allele frequency change in a class-structured population. Am. Nat. 135: 95-106.
27. Taylor, P.D. 1992a. Altruism in viscous populations - an inclusive fitness model. Evol. Ecol. 6, 352-356.
28. Taylor P.D. 1992b. Inclusive fitness in a homogeneous environment. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 249: 299-302.
29. Taylor, P.D. 1996. Inclusive fitness arguments in genetic models of behaviour. J. Math. Biol. 34: 654-674.
30. Taylor, P.D. & Frank, S.A. 1996. How to make a kin selection model. J. Theor. Biol. 180: 27-37.
31. Wild, G. & Taylor, P.D. 2005. A kin-selection approach to the resolution of sex-ratio conflict between mates. J. Theor. Biol. 236: 126-136.
32. Wilson, D.S., Pollock, G.B. & Dugatkin, L.A. 1992. Can altruism evolve in purely viscous populations? Evol. Ecol. 6: 331-341.
33. Wright, S. 1943. Isolation by distance. Genetics 28: 114-138.