Ran-dependent docking of importin β- to RanBP2/Nup358 filaments is essential for protein import and cell viability

Journal of Cell Biology

Volumn 194, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 597-612

  Hamada, Masakazu ^a   Haeger, Anna ^b   Jeganathan, Karthik B ^b   van Ree, Janine H ^b   Malureanu, Liviu ^b   Wälde, Sarah ^c   Joseph, Jomon ^d   Kehlenbach, Ralph H ^c   van Deursen, Jan M ^a,b  

^a MAYO GRADUATE SCHOOL   (United States)

^b MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^d NATIONAL CENTRE FOR CELL SCIENCE   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

KARYOPHERIN BETA; MUTANT PROTEIN; PROTEIN; PROTEIN NUP358; PROTEIN RANBP2; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CELL VIABILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FIBROBLAST; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; KNOCKOUT MOUSE; MOLECULAR DOCKING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN TRANSPORT;

ACTIVE TRANSPORT, CELL NUCLEUS; ANIMALS; BETA KARYOPHERINS; BINDING SITES; CELL LINE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SURVIVAL; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CYTOSKELETON; FIBROBLASTS; HETEROGENEOUS-NUCLEAR RIBONUCLEOPROTEIN GROUP A-B; HUMANS; MICE; MICE, KNOCKOUT; MICROSCOPY, FLUORESCENCE; MICROSCOPY, VIDEO; MITOSIS; MOLECULAR CHAPERONES; MUTATION; NUCLEAR LOCALIZATION SIGNALS; NUCLEAR PORE; NUCLEAR PORE COMPLEX PROTEINS; PEPTIDE FRAGMENTS; PROTEIN INTERACTION DOMAINS AND MOTIFS; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEIN SORTING SIGNALS; RAN GTP-BINDING PROTEIN; RECOMBINANT FUSION PROTEINS; RNA, MESSENGER; SMALL UBIQUITIN-RELATED MODIFIER PROTEINS; TIME FACTORS; TRANSFECTION; UBIQUITIN-PROTEIN LIGASES;

EID: 80052614266     PISSN: 00219525     EISSN: 15408140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201102018     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Arnaoutov, A., and M. Dasso. 2005. Ran-GTP regulates kinetochore attachment in somatic cells. Cell Cycle. 4:1161-1165.
2. Arnaoutov, A., Y. Azuma, K. Ribbeck, J. Joseph, Y. Boyarchuk, T. Karpova, J. McNally, and M. Dasso. 2005. Crm1 is a mitotic effector of Ran-GTP in somatic cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 7:626-632.
3. Aslanukov, A., R. Bhowmick, M. Guruju, J. Oswald, D. Raz, R.A. Bush, P.A. Sieving, X. Lu, C.B. Bock, and P.A. Ferreira. 2006. RanBP2 modulates Cox11 and hexokinase I activities and haploinsufficiency of RanBP2 causes deficits in glucose metabolism. PLoS Genet. 2:e177.
4. Balciunas, D., K.J. Wangensteen, A. Wilber, J. Bell, A. Geurts, S. Sivasubbu, X. Wang, P.B. Hackett, D.A. Largaespada, R.S. McIvor, and S.C. Ekker. 2006. Harnessing a high cargo-capacity transposon for genetic applications in vertebrates. PLoS Genet. 2:e169.
5. Bastos, R., A. Lin, M. Enarson, and B. Burke. 1996. Targeting and function in mRNA export of nuclear pore complex protein Nup153. J. Cell Biol. 134:1141-1156.
6. Bernad, R., H. van der Velde, M. Fornerod, and H. Pickersgill. 2004. Nup358/ RanBP2 attaches to the nuclear pore complex via association with Nup88 and Nup214/CAN and plays a supporting role in CRM1-mediated nuclear protein export. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:2373-2384.
7. Castedo, M., J.L. Perfettini, T. Roumier, K. Andreau, R. Medema, and G. Kroemer. 2004. Cell death by mitotic catastrophe: a molecular definition. Oncogene. 23:2825-2837.
8. Chook, Y.M., and K.E. Suel. 2010. Nuclear import by karyopherin-(s: recognition and inhibition. Biochim. Biophys. Acta.
9. Dasso, M. 2002. The Ran GTPase: theme and variations. Curr. Biol. 12:R502- R508.
10. Dasso, M. 2006. Ran at kinetochores. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 34:711-715.
11. Dawlaty, M.M., L. Malureanu, K.B. Jeganathan, E. Kao, C. Sustmann, S. Tahk, K. Shuai, R. Grosschedl, and J.M. van Deursen. 2008. Resolution of sister centromeres requires RanBP2-mediated SUMOylation of topoisomerase IIalpha. Cell. 133:103-115.
12. Delphin, C., T. Guan, F. Melchior, and L. Gerace. 1997. RanGTP targets p97 to RanBP2, a filamentous protein localized at the cytoplasmic periphery of the nuclear pore complex. Mol. Biol. Cell. 8:2379-2390.
13. Dobles, M., V. Liberal, M.L. Scott, R. Benezra, and P.K. Sorger. 2000. Chromosome missegregation and apoptosis in mice lacking the mitotic checkpoint protein Mad2. Cell. 101:635-645.
14. Engelsma, D., R. Bernad, J. Calafat, and M. Fornerod. 2004. Supraphysiological nuclear export signals bind CRM1 independently of RanGTP and arrest at Nup358. EMBO J. 23:3643-3652.
15. Forler, D., G. Rabut, F.D. Ciccarelli, A. Herold, T. Köcher, R. Niggeweg, P. Bork, J. Ellenberg, and E. Izaurralde. 2004. RanBP2/Nup358 provides a major binding site for NXF1-p15 dimers at the nuclear pore complex and functions in nuclear mRNA export. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:1155-1167.
16. Hutten, S., and R.H. Kehlenbach. 2006. Nup214 is required for CRM1-dependent nuclear protein export in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26:6772-6785.
17. Hutten, S., A. Flotho, F. Melchior, and R.H. Kehlenbach. 2008. The Nup358-RanGAP complex is required for efficient importin alpha/betadependent nuclear import. Mol. Biol. Cell. 19:2300-2310.
18. Hutten, S., S. Wälde, C. Spillner, J. Hauber, and R.H. Kehlenbach. 2009. The nuclear pore component Nup358 promotes transportin-dependent nuclear import. J. Cell Sci. 122:1100-1110.
19. Jeganathan, K., L. Malureanu, D.J. Baker, S.C. Abraham, and J.M. van Deursen. 2007. Bub1 mediates cell death in response to chromosome missegregation and acts to suppress spontaneous tumorigenesis. J. Cell Biol. 179:255-267.
20. Joseph, J., and M. Dasso. 2008. The nucleoporin Nup358 associates with and regulates interphase microtubules. FEBS Lett. 582:190-196.
21. Joseph, J., S.T. Liu, S.A. Jablonski, T.J. Yen, and M. Dasso. 2004. The RanGAP1-RanBP2 complex is essential for microtubule-kinetochore interactions in vivo. Curr. Biol. 14:611-617.
22. Kasper, L.H., P.K. Brindle, C.A. Schnabel, C.E. Pritchard, M.L. Cleary, and J.M. van Deursen. 1999. CREB binding protein interacts with nucleoporin-specific FG repeats that activate transcription and mediate NUP98-HOXA9 oncogenicity. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:764-776.
23. Loonstra, A., M. Vooijs, H.B. Beverloo, B.A. Allak, E. van Drunen, R. Kanaar, A. Berns, and J. Jonkers. 2001. Growth inhibition and DNA damage induced by Cre recombinase in mammalian cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 98:9209-9214.
24. Love, D.C., T.D. Sweitzer, and J.A. Hanover. 1998. Reconstitution of HIV-1 rev nuclear export: independent requirements for nuclear import and export. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 95:10608-10613.
25. Mahajan, R., C. Delphin, T. Guan, L. Gerace, and F. Melchior. 1997. A small ubiquitin-related polypeptide involved in targeting RanGAP1 to nuclear pore complex protein RanBP2. Cell. 88:97-107.
26. Malureanu, L.A., K.B. Jeganathan, M. Hamada, L. Wasilewski, J. Davenport, and J.M. van Deursen. 2009. BubR1 N terminus acts as a soluble inhibitor of cyclin B degradation by APC/C(Cdc20) in interphase. Dev. Cell. 16:118-131.
27. Malureanu, L., K.B. Jeganathan, F. Jin, D.J. Baker, J.H. van Ree, O. Gullon, Z. Chen, J.R. Henley, and J.M. van Deursen. 2010. Cdc20 hypomorphic mice fail to counteract de novo synthesis of cyclin B1 in mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 191:313-329.
28. Matunis, M.J., J. Wu, and G. Blobel. 1998. SUMO-1 modification and its role in targeting the Ran GTPase-activating protein, RanGAP1, to the nuclear pore complex. J. Cell Biol. 140:499-509.
29. Petersen, C., N. Orem, J. Trueheart, J.W. Thorner, and I.G. Macara. 2000. Random mutagenesis and functional analysis of the Ran-binding protein, RanBP1. J. Biol. Chem. 275:4081-4091.
30. Pichler, A., A. Gast, J.S. Seeler, A. Dejean, and F. Melchior. 2002. The nucleoporin RanBP2 has SUMO1 E3 ligase activity. Cell. 108:109-120.
31. Reverter, D., and C.D. Lima. 2005. Insights into E3 ligase activity revealed by a SUMO-RanGAP1-Ubc9-Nup358 complex. Nature. 435:687-692.
32. Salina, D., P. Enarson, J.B. Rattner, and B. Burke. 2003. Nup358 integrates nuclear envelope breakdown with kinetochore assembly. J. Cell Biol. 162:991-1001.
33. Singh, B.B., H.H. Patel, R. Roepman, D. Schick, and P.A. Ferreira. 1999. The zinc finger cluster domain of RanBP2 is a specific docking site for the nuclear export factor, exportin-1. J. Biol. Chem. 274:37370-37378.
34. Strambio-De-Castillia, C., M. Niepel, and M.P. Rout. 2010. The nuclear pore complex: bridging nuclear transport and gene regulation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11:490-501.
35. Taylor, S.S., D. Hussein, Y. Wang, S. Elderkin, and C.J. Morrow. 2001. Kinetochore localisation and phosphorylation of the mitotic checkpoint components Bub1 and BubR1 are differentially regulated by spindle events in human cells. J. Cell Sci. 114:4385-4395.
36. Terry, L.J., and S.R. Wente. 2009. Flexible gates: dynamic topologies and functions for FG nucleoporins in nucleocytoplasmic transport. Eukaryot. Cell. 8:1814-1827.
37. Villa Braslavsky, C.I., C. Nowak, D. Görlich, A. Wittinghofer, and J. Kuhlmann. 2000. Different structural and kinetic requirements for the interaction of Ran with the Ran-binding domains from RanBP2 and importin-beta. Biochemistry. 39:11629-11639.
38. Vitale, I., L. Galluzzi, M. Castedo, and G. Kroemer. 2011. Mitotic catastrophe: a mechanism for avoiding genomic instability. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 12:385-392.
39. Walther, T.C., H.S. Pickersgill, V.C. Cordes, M.W. Goldberg, T.D. Allen, I.W. Mattaj, and M. Fornerod. 2002. The cytoplasmic filaments of the nuclear pore complex are dispensable for selective nuclear protein import. J. Cell Biol. 158:63-77.
40. Wente, S.R., and M.P. Rout. 2010. The nuclear pore complex and nuclear transport. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2:a000562.
41. Wozniak, R., B. Burke, and V. Doye. 2010. Nuclear transport and the mitotic apparatus: an evolving relationship. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 67:2215-2230.
42. Wu, J., M.J. Matunis, D. Kraemer, G. Blobel, and E. Coutavas. 1995. Nup358, a cytoplasmically exposed nucleoporin with peptide repeats, Ran-GTP binding sites, zinc fingers, a cyclophilin A homologous domain, and a leucine-rich region. J. Biol. Chem. 270:14209-14213.
43. Wu, X., L.H. Kasper, R.T. Mantcheva, G.T. Mantchev, M.J. Springett, and J.M. van Deursen. 2001. Disruption of the FG nucleoporin NUP98 causes selective changes in nuclear pore complex stoichiometry and function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 98:3191-3196.
44. Yamasaki, H., T. Sekimoto, T. Ohkubo, T. Douchi, Y. Nagata, M. Ozawa, and Y. Yoneda. 2005. Zinc finger domain of Snail functions as a nuclear localization signal for importin beta-mediated nuclear import pathway. Genes Cells. 10:455-464.
45. Yaseen, N.R., and G. Blobel. 1999. GTP hydrolysis links initiation and termination of nuclear import on the nucleoporin nup358. J. Biol. Chem. 274:26493-26502.
46. Yokoyama, N., N. Hayashi, T. Seki, N. Panté, T. Ohba, K. Nishii, K. Kuma, T. Hayashida, T. Miyata, U. Aebi, et al. 1995. A giant nucleopore protein that binds Ran/TC4. Nature. 376:184-188.
47. Zhang, H., H. Saitoh, and M.J. Matunis. 2002. Enzymes of the SUMO modification pathway localize to filaments of the nuclear pore complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:6498-6508.
48. Zhang, X.D., J. Goeres, H. Zhang, T.J. Yen, A.C. Porter, and M.J. Matunis. 2008. SUMO-2/3 modification and binding regulate the association of CENP-E with kinetochores and progression through mitosis. Mol. Cell. 29:729-741.
49. Zhu, S., J. Goeres, K.M. Sixt, M. Békés, X.D. Zhang, G.S. Salvesen, and M.J. Matunis. 2009. Protection from isopeptidase-mediated deconjugation regulates paralog-selective sumoylation of RanGAP1. Mol. Cell. 33: 570-580.