Cephalometric measurements from 3D reconstructed images compared with conventional 2D images

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 81, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 856-864

  Zamora, Natalia ^a   Llamas, Jose M ^a   Cibrián, Rosa ^b   Gandia, Jose L ^a   Paredes, Vanessa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

Author keywords

2D; 3D; CBCT; Cephalometric; LCR; Measurement

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INCISOR; MALE; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; NASAL BONE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PALATE; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SELLA TURCICA; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INCISOR; MALE; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; NASAL BONE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PALATE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELLA TURCICA; SOFTWARE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80052495088     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 19457103     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2319/121210-717.1     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Arai Y, Tammisalo E, Iwai K, Hashimoto K, Shinoda K. Development of a compact computed tomographic apparatus for dental use. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1999;28:245-248.
2. Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol. 1998;8:1558-1564. (Pubitemid 128662693)
3. Mah J, Hatcher D. Diagnóstico por imagen craneofacial en ortodoncia. Capítulo 2. In: Grabber TM, Vanarsdall RL, Vig KWL, eds. Orthodontics: Current Principles and Techniques. St Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2005:71-100.
4. Kitaura H, Yonetsu K, Kitamori H, Kobayashi K, Nakamura T. Standardization of 3-D CT measurements for length and angles by matrix transformation in the 3-D coordinate system. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2000;37:349-356. (Pubitemid 30441682)
5. Pinsky HM, Dyda S, Pinsky RW, Misch KA, Sarment DP. Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements using conebeam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006;35:410-416. (Pubitemid 44904797)
6. Lascala CA, Panella J, Marques MM. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom). Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004;33:291-294. (Pubitemid 40288455)
7. Marmulla R, Wörtche R, Mühling J, Hassfeld S. Geometric accuracy of the NewTom 9000 Cone Beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2005;34:28-31. (Pubitemid 40352815)
8. Mischkowski RA, Pulsfort R, Ritter L, Neugebauer J, Brochhagen HG, Keeve E, Zöller JE. Geometric accuracy of a newly developed cone-beam device for maxillofacial imaging. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;104:551-559.
9. Moshiri M, Scarfe WC, Hilgers ML, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG. Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from conebeam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132:550-560.
10. Moerenhout BA, Gelaude F, Swennen GR, Casselman JW, Van der Sloten J, Mommaerts MY. Accuracy and repeatability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements used in the determination of facial indices in the laboratory setup. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2008;22:1-6.
11. Lagravère MO, Carey J, Toogood RW, Major PW. Threedimensional accuracy of measurements made with software on cone-beam computed tomography images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134:112-116.
12. Stratemann SA, Huang JC, Maki K, Miller AJ, Hatcher DC. Comparison of cone beam computed tomography imaging with physical measures. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008;37:80-93.
13. Periago DR, Scarfe WC, Moshiri M, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program. Angle Orthod. 2008;78:387-395.
14. Oliveira AE, Cevidanes LH, Phillips C, Motta A, Burke B, Tyndall D. Observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on cone-beam computerized tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;107:256-265.
15. Kumar V, Ludlow JB, Mol A, Cevidanes L. Comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2007;36:263-269. (Pubitemid 47218404)
16. Cattaneo PM, Melsen B. The use of cone-beam computed tomography in an orthodontic department in between research and daily clinic. World J Orthod. 2008;9:269-282.
17. Kobayashi K, Shimod S, Nakagawa Y, Yamamoto A. Accuracy measurement of distance using limited conebeam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19:228-231. (Pubitemid 38561060)
18. Suri S, Utreja A, Khandelwal N, Mago SK. Craniofacial computerized tomography analysis of the midface of patients with repaired complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134:418-429.
19. Brown AA, Scarfe WC, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG. Linear accuracy of cone beam CT derived 3D images. Angle Orthod. 2009;79:150-157.
20. Grauer D, Cevidanes L, Styner MA, Heulfed I, Harmon ET, Zhuf H, Proffit WR. Accuracy and landmark error calculation using cone-beam computed tomography-generated cephalograms. Angle Orthod. 2010;80:286-294.
21. Cattaneo PM, Bloch CB, Calmar D, Hjortshøj M, Melsen B. Comparison between conventional and cone-beam computed tomography-generated cephalograms. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134:798-802.
22. Lamichane M, Anderson NK, Rigali PH, Seldin EB, Wille LA. Accuracy of reconstructed images from cone-beam computed tomography scans. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136:156.e1-6.
23. Van Vlijmen OJ, Bergé SJ, Swennen GR, Bronkhorst EM, Katsaros C, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Comparison of cephalometric radiographs obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans and conventional radiographs. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67:92-97.
24. Van Vlijmen OJ, Bergé SJ, Bronkhorst EM, Swennen GR, Katsaros C, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. A comparison of frontal radiographs obtained from cone beam CT scans and conventional frontal radiographs of human skulls. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;38:773-778.
25. Hassan B, Stelt P, Sanderink G. Accuracy of threedimensional measurements obtained from cone beam computed tomography surface-rendered images for cephalometric analysis: influence of patient scanning position. Eur J Orthod. 2009;31:129-134.
26. Van Vlijmen OJ, Rangel FA, Bergé SJ, Bronkhorst EM, Becking AG, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Measurements on 3D models of human skulls derived from two different cone beam CT scanners. Clin Oral Investig. 2010; Jul. 17 (Epub ahead of print).
27. Van Vlijmen OJ, Maal T, Bergé SJ, Bronkhorst EM, Katsaros C, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. A comparison between 2D and 3D cephalometry on CBCT scans of human skulls. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;39:156-160.
28. Van Vlijmen OJ, Maal TJ, Bergé SJ, Bronkhorst EM, Katsaros C, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional cephalometry on frontal radiographs and on cone beam computed tomography scans of human skulls. Eur J Oral Sci. 2009;117:300-305.
29. Yitschaky O, Redlich M, Abed Y, Faerman M, Casap N, Hiller N. Comparison of common hard tissue cephalometric measurements between computed tomography 3D reconstruction and conventional 2D cephalometric images. Angle Orthod. 2011;81:13-18.
30. Nalçaci R, Oztürk F, Sökücü O. A comparison of twodimensional radiography and three-dimensional computed tomography in angular cephalometric measurements. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010;39:100-106.