A comparison of frontal radiographs obtained from cone beam CT scans and conventional frontal radiographs of human skulls

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Volumn 38, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 773-778

  van Vlijmen, O J C ^a,b   Berge S J ^a,b   Bronkhorst, E M ^b   Swennen, G R J ^a,c   Katsaros, C ^d   Kuijpers Jagtman, A M ^a,b  

^a 3D Facial Imaging Research Group Nijmegen Bruges (3D FIRG)   (Netherlands)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c AZ Sint Jan AV ^*  (Belgium)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Cephalometry; Maxillofacial; Orthodontics; Reproducibility; Three dimensional imaging; X ray computed tomography

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRARATER RELIABILITY; PATIENT POSITIONING; REPRODUCIBILITY; SKULL; SKULL RADIOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

CADAVER; CEPHALOMETRY; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; POSTURE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SKULL;

EID: 68749113803     PISSN: 09015027     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2009.02.024     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Broadbent B.H. A new X-ray technique and its application to orthodontia. Angle Orthod 1 (1931) 45-66
2. Ghafari G.G. Posteroanterior cepahalometry: Craniofacialfrontal analysis. In: Jacobson A. (Ed). Radiographic Cephalometry (2006), Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc., Hanover Park 267-292
3. Gottlieb E.L., and Nelson A.H. Vogels: 1990 JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures. 1. Results and trends. J Clin Orthod: 25 (1991) 145-156
4. Greiner M., Greiner A., and Hirschfelder U. Variance of landmarks in digital evaluations: comparison between CT-based and conventional digital lateral cephalometric radiographs. J Orofac Orthop 68 (2007) 290-298
5. Hajeer M.Y., Ayoub A.F., Millett D.T., Bock M., and Siebert J.P. Three-dimensional imaging in orthognathic surgery: the clinical application of a new method. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 17 (2002) 318-330
6. Hofrath H. Bedeutung der Röntgenfern und Abstands Aufnahme für die Diagnostik der Kieferanomalien. Fortschr Orthod 1 (1931) 231-258
7. Houston W.J. The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod 83 (1983) 382-390
8. Kumar V., Ludlow J.B., Mol A., and Cevidanes L. Comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 36 (2007) 263-269
9. Lou L., Lagravere M.O., Compton S., Major P.W., and Flores-Mir C. Accuracy of measurements and reliability of landmark identification with computed tomography (CT) techniques in the maxillofacial area: a systematic review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 104 (2007) 402-411 Epub 2006 Oct 27
10. Ludlow J.B., Davies-Ludlow L.E., Brooks S.L., and Howerton W.B. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 35 (2006) 219-226
11. Moshiri M., Scarfe W.C., Hilgers M.L., Scheetz J.P., Silveira A.M., and Farman A.G. Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 132 (2007) 550-560
12. Silva M.A., Wolf U., Heinicke F., Bumann A., Visser H., and Hirsch E. Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 133 (2008) 640 e1-5
13. In: Swennen G.R.J., Schutyser F., and Hausamen J.E. (Eds). Three-dimensional cephalometry. A color atlas and manual (2005), Heidelberg Springer, Berlin 183-226
14. Swennen G.R.J., and Schutyser F. Three-dimensional virtual approach to diagnosis and treatment planning of maxillo-facial deformity. In: Bell W.H., and Guerrero C.A. (Eds). Distraction Osteogenesis of the Facial Skeleton (2007), BC Decker Inc, Hamilton 55-79
15. Van Vlijmen O.J., Bergé S.J., Swennen G.R., Bronkhorst E.M., Katsaros C., and Kuijpers-Jagtman A.M. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67 (2009) 92-97