Comparison of common hard tissue cephalometric measurements between computed tomography 3D reconstruction and conventional 2D cephalometric images

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 81, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 13-18

  Yitschaky, Oded ^a   Redlich, Meir ^a   Abed, Yossi ^a   Faerman, Marina ^a   Casap, Nardy ^a   Hiller, Nurith ^b  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^b HADASSAH HEBREW UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

Author keywords

Analysis; Cephalometric; CT

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CADAVER; CEPHALOMETRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FACIAL BONE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; ORTHODONTICS; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SELLA TURCICA; SPIRAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; STATISTICS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VALIDATION STUDY;

CADAVER; CEPHALOMETRY; FACIAL BONES; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; ORTHODONTICS; RADIOGRAPHIC MAGNIFICATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELLA TURCICA; TOMOGRAPHY, SPIRAL COMPUTED;

EID: 78649597075     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 00033219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2319/031710-157.1     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Downs WB. Variations in facial relationship-their significance in treatment and prognosis. Am J Orthod. 1948;34: 812-840.
2. Downs WB. The role of cephalometrics in orthodontic case analysis and diagnosis. Am J Orthod. 1952;38:162-182.
3. Downs WB. Analysis of dentofacial profile. Angle Orthod. 1956;26:191-212.
4. Steiner CC. The use of cephalometrics as an aid to planning and assessing orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod. 1960;46: 721-735.
5. Ricketts RM. Perspectives in the clinical application of cephalometrics. The first fifty years. Angle Orthod. 1981;51: 115-150.
6. McNamara JA Jr. A method of cephalometric evaluation. Am J Orthod. 1984;86:449-468.
7. Broadbent BH. A new X-ray technique and its application to orthodontia. Angle Orthod. 1931;1:45-66.
8. Baumrind S, Carlson S, Beers A, Curry S, Norris N, Boyd RL. Using three-dimensional imaging to assess treatment outcomes in orthodontics: a progress report from the University of the Pacific. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2003;6(suppl):132-142.
9. Halazonetis DJ. From 2-dimensional cephalograms to 3- dimensional computed tomography scans. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;127:627-637.
10. Swennen GRJ, Schutyser F, Hausamen JE. Three Dimensional Cephalometry - A Color Atlas and Manual. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2005.
11. Mah J, Danforth RA, Bumann A, Hatcher D. Radiation absorbed in maxillofacial imaging with a new dental computed tomography device. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003;96:508-513.
12. Mah J, Hatcher D. Current status and future needs in craniofacial imaging. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2003;6(suppl): 10-16.
13. Maki K, Inou N, Takanishi A, Miller AJ. Computer-assisted simulations in orthodontic diagnosis and the application of a new cone beam X-ray computed tomography. Orthod Craniofacial Res. 2003;6(suppl):95-101.
14. Hashimoto K, Arai Y, Iwai K, Araki M, Kawashima S, Terakado M. A comparison of a new limited cone beam computed tomography machine for dental use with multidetector row helical CT machine. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003;95:371-377.
15. Kau CH, Richmond S, Palomo JM, Hans MG. Current products and practice three dimensional cone beam computerized tomography in orthodontics. J Orthod. 2005; 32:282-293.
16. Sukovic P. Cone beam computed tomography in craniofacial imaging. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2003;6(suppl):31-36.
17. Yamamoto K, Uneo K, Seo K, Shinohara D. Development of dento-maxillofacial cone beam X-ray computed tomography system. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2003;6(suppl):160-162.
18. Periago DR, Scarfe WC, Moshiri M, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program. Angle Orthod. 2008;78:387-395.
19. Olszewski R, Reychler H, Cosnard G, Denis JM, Vynckier S, Zech F. Accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) craniofacial cephalometric landmarks on a low-dose 3D computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008;37:261-267.
20. Connor SE, Arscott T, Berry J, Greene L, O'Gorman R. Precision and accuracy of low-dose CT protocols in the evaluation of skull landmarks. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2007; 36:270-276.
21. Cavalcanti MG, Rocha SS, Vannier MW. Craniofacial measurements based on 3D-CT volume rendering: implications for clinical applications. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004; 33:170-176.
22. Chidiac JJ, Shofer FS, Al-Kutombi, Laster LL, Ghafari J. Comparison of CT scanograms and cephalometric radiographs in craniofacial imaging. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2002; 5:104-113.
23. Moshiri M, Scarfe WC, Hilgers ML, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farmen AG. Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from conebeam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132:550-560.
24. Adams GL, Gansky SA, Miller AJ, Harrell WE Jr, Hatcher DC. Comparison between traditional 2-dimensional cephalometry and a 3-dimensional approach on human dry skulls. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;126:397-409.
25. Olszewski R, Zech F, Cosnard G, Nicolas V, Macq B, Reychler H. Three-dimensional computed tomography cephalometric craniofacial analysis: experimental validation in vitro. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;36:828-833.