A comparison of two-dimensional radiography and threedimensional computed tomography in angular cephalometric measurements

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 100-106

  Nalçaci, Ruhi ^a   Ozturk F ^b   Sokucu O ^c  

^a CUMHURIYET UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b INONU UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c GAZIANTEP UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Cephalometric measurements; Computed tomography; Three dimensional cephalometry

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIATION DOSE; RADIOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CEPHALOMETRY; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 75949094768     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/82724776     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Broadbent BH. A new x-ray technique and its application to orthodontia. Angle Orthod 1931; 51: 93-114.
2. Halazonetis DJ. From 2-dimensional cephalograms to 3-dimensional computed tomography scans. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 127: 627-637.
3. Papadopoulos MA, Jannowitz C, Boettcher P, Henke J, Stolla R, Zeilhofer HF, et al. Three-dimensional fetal cephalometry: an evaluation of the reliability of cephalometric measurements based on three-dimensional CT reconstructions and on dry skulls of sheep fetuses. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2005; 33: 229-237.
4. Moyers RE, Bookstein FL, Hunter WS. Analysis of the craniofacial skeleton: cephalometrics. In: Moyers RE (ed). Handbook of orthodontics. Chicago: Year Book Medical, 1988, pp 247-309.
5. Baumrind S, Frantz RC. The reliability of head film measurements. 1. Landmark identification. Am J Orthod 1971; 60: 111-127.
6. Adams GL, Gansky SA, Miller A, Harrell WE, Hatcher DC. Comparison between traditional 2-dimensional cephalometry and a 3-dimensional approach on human dry skulls. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 126: 397-409.
7. Van Der Meij A. Reliability and reproducibility of the landmarks of postero anterior cephalometry. Masters Thesis. Aarhus: The Royal Dental College, 1997.
8. Herman GT, Lie HK. Three-dimensional display of human organs from computed tomograms. Comput Graphics Image Process 1979; 9: 1.
9. Xia J, Ip HH, Samman N, Wang D, Kot CS, Yeung RW, et al. Computer-assisted three-dimensional surgical planning and simulation: 3D virtual osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000; 29: 11-17.
10. Lagravére MO, Major PW. Proposed reference point for 3-dimensional cephalometric analysis with cone-beam computerized tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 128: 657-660.
11. Kirzioǧlu Z, Karayilmaz H, Baykal B. Value of computed tomography (CT) in imaging the morbidity of submerged molars: a case report. Eur J Dent 2007; 1: 246-250.
12. Hatcher DC, Aboudara CL. Diagnosis goes digital. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 125: 512-515.
13. Mah JK, Danforth RA, Bumann A, Hatcher D. Radiation absorbed in maxillofacial imaging with a new dental computed tomography device. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003; 96: 508-513.
14. Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. New York, NY: Interscience Publications, 1940.
15. Berkowitz S. A multicenter retrospective 3D study of serial complete unilateral cleft lip and palate and complete bilateral cleft lip and palate casts to evaluate treatment. Part 1. The participating institutions and research aims. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1999; 36: 413-424.
16. Lagravére MO, Hansen L, Harzer W, Major PW. Plane orientation for standardization in 3-dimensional cephalometric analysis with computerized tomography imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 129: 601-614.
17. Doruk C, Sökücü O, Biçakçi AA, Yilmaz U, Taş F. Comparison of nasal volume changes during rapid maxillary expansion using acoustic rhinometry and computed tomography. Eur J Orthod 2007; 29: 251-255.
18. Katsumata A, Fujishita M, Maeda M, Ariji Y, Ariji E, Langlais RP. 3D-CT evaluation of facial asymmetry. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005; 99: 212-220.
19. Matteson SR, Bechtold W, Phillips C. A method for three dimensional image reformation for quantitative cephalometric analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1989; 47: 1053-1061.
20. Hildebolt CF, Vannier MW, Knapp RH. Validation study of skull three-dimensional computerized tomography measurements. Am J Phys Anthropol 1990; 82: 283-294.
21. Cevidanes LHS, Styner MA, Proffit WR. Image analysis and superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 129: 611-618.
22. Stabrun AE, Danielsen K. Precision in cephalometric landmark identification. Eur J Orthod 1982; 4: 185-196.
23. Chan CK, Tng TH, Hägg U, Cooke MS. Effects of cephalometric landmark validity on incisor angulation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994; 106: 487-495.
24. Whyte AM, Hourihan MD, Earley MJ, Sugar A. Radiological assessment of hemifacial microsomia by three-dimensional computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1990; 19: 119-125.
25. Tyndall DA, Renner JB, Phillips C, Matteson SR. Positional changes of the mandibular condyle assessed by three-dimensional computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992; 50: 1164-1172.
26. Silva MA, Wolf U, Heinicke F, Bumann A, Visser H, Hirsch E. Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 133: 640.e1-640.e5.
27. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, White SC. Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examinations: the impact of 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations regarding dose calculation. J Am Dent Assoc 2008; 139: 237-243.
28. Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 106: 106-114.