Effect of laser micromachining of titanium on viability and responsiveness of osteoblast-like cells

Implant Dentistry

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 285-291

  Cei, Silvia ^a   Legitimo, Annalisa ^a   Barachini, Serena ^a   Consolini, Rita ^a   Sammartino, Gilberto ^b   Mattii, Letizia ^a   Gabriele, Mario ^a   Graziani, Filippo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PISA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

Author keywords

dental implant; DPSS laser; primary osteoblast; titanium surfaces

Indexed keywords

PLATELET DERIVED GROWTH FACTOR; TETRAZOLIUM; TITANIUM;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SHAPE; CELL SURVIVAL; CULTURE MEDIUM; CYTOLOGY; DENTAL ETCHING; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; METABOLISM; OSTEOBLAST; POROSITY; PSEUDOPODIUM; SOLID STATE LASER; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CELL ADHESION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SHAPE; CELL SURVIVAL; CELLS, CULTURED; CULTURE MEDIA, CONDITIONED; CULTURE MEDIA, SERUM-FREE; DENTAL ETCHING; HUMANS; LASERS, SOLID-STATE; OSTEOBLASTS; PLATELET-DERIVED GROWTH FACTOR; POROSITY; PSEUDOPODIA; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TETRAZOLIUM SALTS; TITANIUM; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80051801982     PISSN: 10566163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31821bfa9f     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Cooper LF. Biologic determinants of bone formation for osseointegration: Clues for future clinical improvements. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80:439-449.
2. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: A systematic review. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2009;20 (suppl 4):172-184.
3. Shalabi MM, Gortemaker A, Van't Hof MA, et al. Implant surface roughness and bone healing: A systematic review. J Dent Res. 2006;85:496-500. (Pubitemid 43945484)
4. Bachle M, Kohal RJ. A systematic review of the influence of different titanium surfaces on proliferation, differentiation and protein synthesis of osteoblast-like MG63 cells. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004; 15:683-692. (Pubitemid 40115756)
5. Ellingsen JE. Surface configurations of dental implants. Periodontol 2000. 1998;17:36-46. (Pubitemid 128556015)
6. Grassi S, Piattelli A, de Figueiredo LC, et al. Histologic evaluation of early human bone response to different implant surfaces. J Periodontol. 2006;77:1736-1743. (Pubitemid 44680239)
7. Trisi P, Lazzara R, Rebaudi A, et al. Bone-implant contact on machined and dual acid-etched surfaces after 2 months of healing in the human maxilla. J Periodontol. 2003;74:945-956. (Pubitemid 37038528)
8. Berglundh T, Gotfredsen K, Zitzmann NU, et al. Spontaneous progression of ligature induced peri-implantitis at implants with different surface roughness: An experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18:655-661.
9. Quirynen M, Abarca M, Van Assche N, et al. Impact of supportive periodontal therapy and implant surface roughness on implant outcome in patients with a history of periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2007; 34:805-815.
10. Szmukler-Moncler S, Testori T, Bernard JP. Etched implants: A comparative surface analysis of four implant systems. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2004;69:46-57. (Pubitemid 38396783)
11. Zhao G, Zinger O, Schwartz Z, et al. Osteoblast-like cells are sensitive to submicron-scale surface structure. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17:258-264. (Pubitemid 43709392)
12. Zinger O, Anselme K, Denzer A, et al. Time-dependent morphology and adhesion of osteoblastic cells on titanium model surfaces featuring scale-resolved topography. Biomaterials. 2004;25:2695-2711. (Pubitemid 38201297)
13. Zinger O, Zhao G, Schwartz Z, et al. Differential regulation of osteoblasts by substrate microstructural features. Biomaterials. 2005;26:1837-1847. (Pubitemid 39575326)
14. Gaggl A, Schultes G, Mü ller, et al. Scanning electron microscopical analysis of laser-treated titanium implant surfaces-A comparative study. Biomaterials. 2000;21: 1067-1073. (Pubitemid 30145698)
15. Cho SA, Jung SK. A removal torque of the laser-treated titanium implants in rabbit tibia. Biomaterials. 2003; 24:4859-4863.
16. Joó b-Fancsaly A, Divinyi T, Fazekas Á , et al. Pulsed laser-induced micro-and nanosized morphology and composition of titanium dental implants. Smart Mater Struct. 2002;11:819.
17. Shephard JD, Couny F, Russell PS, et al. Improved hollow-core photonic crystal fiber design for delivery of nanosecond pulses in laser micromachining applications. Appl Opt. 2005;44:4582-4588. (Pubitemid 41101464)
18. Berardi D, De Benedittis S, Polimeni A, et al. In vitro evaluation of the efficacy of a new laser surface implant: Cellular adhesion and alkaline phosphatase production tests. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2009;22:125-131.
19. Hallgren C, Reimers H, Gold J, et al. The importance of surface texture for bone integration of screw shaped implants: An in vivo study of implants patterned by photolithography. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001;57:485-496. (Pubitemid 32937529)
20. Graziani F, D'Aiuto F, Arduino PG, et al. Perioperative dexamethasone reduces post-surgical sequelae of wisdom tooth removal. A split-mouth randomized double-masked clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;35:241-246. (Pubitemid 43154392)
21. Graziani F, Ivanovski S, Cei S, et al. The in vitro effect of different PRP concentrations on osteoblasts and fibroblasts. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17:212-219. (Pubitemid 43374309)
22. Gruber R, Varga F, Fischer MB, et al. Platelets stimulate proliferation of bone cells: Involvement of platelet-derived growth factor, microparticles and membranes. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;13:529-535. (Pubitemid 41713080)
23. Kim Y, Ohyama H, Patel V, et al. Mutation of Cys105 inhibits dimerization of p12CDK2-AP1 and its growth suppressor effect. J Biol Chem. 2005;80:23273-23279. (Pubitemid 40853239)
24. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B. Bone tissue response to commercially pure titanium implants blasted with fine and coarse particles of aluminum oxide. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996; 11:38-45. (Pubitemid 126442752)
25. Stangl R, Rinne B, Kastl S, et al. The influence of pore geometry in cp Tiimplants-A cell culture investigation. Eur Cell Mater. 2001;2:1-9. (Pubitemid 38904459)
26. Hallgren C, Reimers H, Chakarov D, et al. An in vivo study of bone response to implants topographically modified by laser micromachining. Biomaterials. 2003; 24:701-710. (Pubitemid 35449823)
27. Duncan AC, Weisbuch F, Rouais F, et al. Laser microfabricated model surfaces for controlled cell growth. Biosens Bioelectron. 2002;17:413-426. (Pubitemid 34219140)
28. Meyer U, Bü chter A, Wiesmann HP, et al. Basic reactions of osteoblasts on structured material surfaces. Eur Cell Mater. 2005;26:39-49. (Pubitemid 41008177)
29. Hansson S, Norton M. The relation between surface roughness and interfacial shear strength for bone-anchored implants. A mathematical model. J Biomech. 1999;32:829-836. (Pubitemid 29287105)
30. Rosa AL, Crippa GE, de Oliveira PT, et al. Human alveolar bone cell proliferation, expression of osteoblastic phenotype, and matrix mineralization on porous titanium produced by powder metallurgy. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:472-481.
31. Brunette DM. The effects of implant surface topography on the behavior of cells. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1988;3:231-246.
32. Clover J, Gowen M. Are MG-63 and HOS TE85 human osteosarcoma cell lines representative models of the osteoblastic phenotype? Bone. 1994;15:585-591. (Pubitemid 24332649)