In vitro evaluation of the efficacy of a new laser surface implant: Cellular adhesion and alkaline phosphatase production tests

International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 125-131

  Berardi, D ^a   De Benedittis, S ^a   Polimeni, A ^b   Malagola, C ^b   Cassinelli, C ^c   Perfetti, G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHIETI   (Italy)

^b SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^c Nobil Bio Ricerche Srl   (Italy)

Author keywords

Alkaline phosphatase; Cell proliferation differentiation; Laser implant surface; Osseointegration; Titanium surface

Indexed keywords

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; TITANIUM;

ARTICLE; BONE TISSUE; CELL ADHESION; CELL GROWTH; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SURFACE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CULTURE MEDIUM; ENZYME ACTIVITY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; IMPLANT; IN VITRO STUDY; LASER; OSTEOBLAST; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 62649135303     PISSN: 03946320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/039463200902200114     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bowers KT, Keller JC, Randolph BR, Michaels CM, Wick DG. Optimization of surface micromorphology for enhanced osteoblast responses in vitro. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992; 7:302-310.
2. Groessner-Schreiber B, Tuan RS. Enhanced extracellular matrix production and mineralization by osteoblast cultured on titanium surfaces in vitro. J Cell Sci 1992; 101:209-217.
3. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B, Kroll JJ. A histomorphometric and removal torque study of screw-shaped titanium implants with three different surface topographies. Clin Oral Impl Res 1995; 6:24-30.
4. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B. Bone tissue response to commercially pure titanium implants blasted with fine and coarse particles of aluminium oxide. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996; 11:38-45.
5. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Johansson C, Andersson B. Experimental study of turned and gritblasted implants with special emphasis on effect of blasting material surface topography. Biomaterials 1996; 17:15-22.
6. Wennerberg A, Ektessabi A, Albrektsson T, Johansson C, Andersson B. A 1-year follow-up of implants of differing surface roughness placed in rabbit bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997; 12: 486-494.
7. Wenneberg A. Patent WO 01/35871 A1.
8. Albrektsson, T, Branemark, P-I, Hansson H-A, Lindstrom J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirement for ensuring a long-lasting direct bone anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 1981; 52:155-170.
9. Park JB, Bronzino JD, Kim YK. Metallic Biomaterials, Ceramic Biomaterials, In: Biomaterials Principles and Application: Park J.B. and Bronzino J.D. (eds), pp 1-45, CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA, 2003.
10. Tan J, Saltzman WM. Biomaterials with hierarchically defined micro- and nanoscale structure. Biomaterials 2004; 25:3593-3601.
11. Ji B, Gao H. Mechanical properties of nanostructure of biological materials. J. Mech Phy Solids 2004; 52: 1963-1990.
12. Dan N. Synthesis of hierarchical materials. Trends Biotechnol 2000; 18:370-374.
13. Mann S. Biomaterializations and biomimetic materials chemistry. J Mater Chem 1995; 5:935-946.
14. Robinson R. The possible significance of hexosephosphoric ester in ossification. Biochem J 1923; 17:286-293.
15. Miao D, Scutt A. Histochemical localization of alkaline phosphatase activity in decalcified bone and cartilage. J Histochem Cytochem 2002; 50:333-340.
16. Henthorn P, Millan JL, Leboy P. Principles of bone biology, 1999 eds. Seibel MJ, Robins SP, Bilezikian JP. Academic, San Diego, pp. 127-136.
17. Harris H. The Human alkaline phosphatases: what we know and what we don't know. Clin Chim Acta 1989; 186:133-200.
18. Puleo DA, Nanci A. Understanding and controlling the bone-implant interface. Biomaterials 1999; 20: 2311-21.
19. Wieland M, Textor M, Chehroudi B, Brunette DM. Synergistic interaction of topographic features in the production of bone-like nodules on Ti surfaces by rat osteoblasts. Biomaterials 2005; 26(10):1119-30.
20. Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Lussi A, Higginbottom FL, Buser D. Bone response to unloaded and loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a histometric study in the canine mandible. J Biomed Mater Res 1998; 40:1-11.
21. Clover J, Gowen M. Are MG-63 and HOS TE 85 Human osteosarcoma cell lines representative models of the osteoblastic phenotype? Bone 1994; 15:585-91.
22. Boyan BD, Schwartz Z, Lohmann CH, Sylvia VL, Cochran DL, Dean DD, et al. Pretreatment of bone with osteoclasts affects phenotypic expression of osteoblast- like cells. J Orthop Res 2003; 21(4):638-47.
23. Zinger O, Zhao G, Schwartz Z, Simpson J, Wieland M, Landolt D, et al. Differential regulation of osteoblasts by substrate microstructural features. Biomaterials 2005; 26:1837-47.
24. Owen TA, Holthuis J, Markose E, van Wijnen AJ, Wolfe SA, Grimes SR, et al. Modification of protein- DNA interactions in the proximal promoter of a cell-growth-regulated histone gene during onset and progression of osteoblast differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990; 87:5129-33.
25. Geckeler K, Wacker R, Martini F, Hack A, Aicher W. Enhanced biocompatibility for SAOS-2 osteosarcoma cells by surface coating with hydrofilic epoxy resins. Cell Physiol Biochem 2003; 13:155-64.
26. Muhonen V, Heikkinen R, Danilov A, Jamsa T, Ilvesaro J, Tuukkanen J. The phase state of NiTi implant material affects osteoclastic attachment. J Biomed Mater Res 2005; 75:681-8.