Scanning electron microscopical analysis of laser-treated titanium implant surfaces-a comparative study

Biomaterials

Volumn 21, Issue 10, 2000, Pages 1067-1073

  Gaggl, A ^a   Schultes, G ^a   Muller W D ^b   Karcher H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

^b HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

EDS analysis; Scanning electron microscopy; Titanium implants

Indexed keywords

ENERGY DISPERSIVE SPECTROSCOPY; LASER APPLICATIONS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SPRAYED COATINGS; SURFACE ROUGHNESS; SURFACE TREATMENT; TITANIUM;

LASER SURFACE TREATMENT; MECHANICAL PROFILOMETRY;

IMPLANTS (SURGICAL);

ALUMINUM OXIDE; TITANIUM; TITANIUM DIOXIDE; TOOTH CEMENT;

ARTICLE; BONE REGENERATION; CONTAMINATION; IMPLANT; LASER; MECHANICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ALUMINUM OXIDE; CAUSTICS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; LASERS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM;

EID: 0034059429     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00002-8     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Steflik D.E., Corpe R.S., Lake F.T., Young T.R., Sisk A.L., Parr G.R., Hanes P.J., Berkery D.J. Ultrastructural analyses of the attachment zone between bone and implanted biomaterials. J Biomed Mater Res. 39:1998;611-620.
2. Pebe P., Bardot R., Trinidad J., Pesquara A., Lucente J., Nishimura R., Nasr H. Countertorque testing and histomorphometric analysis of various implant surfaces in canines. a pilot study Implant Dent. 6:1997;256-265.
3. König-Junior B., Beck T.J., Kappert H.F., Kappert C.C., Masuko T.S. A study of different calcification areas in newly formed bone 8 weeks after insertion of dental implants in rabbit tibias. Anat Anz. 180:1998;471-475.
4. Davies J.E. Mechanisms of osseous integration. Int J Prosthodont. 11:1998;391-401.
5. Overgaard S., Lind M., Glerup H., Bunger C., Soballe K. Porous-coated versus grit-blasted surface texture of hydroxyapatite-coated implants during controlled micromotion. mechanical and histomorphological results J Arthroplasty. 13:1998;449-458.
6. Wennerberg A., Hallgren C., Johansson C., Danelli S. A histomorphometric evaluation of screw-shaped implants each prepared with two surface roughnesses. Clin Oral Implant Res. 9:1998;11-19.
7. Branemark P.I., Hansson B.O., Adell R., Breine U., Lindstrom J., Hallen O., Ohman A. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the endentulous jaw. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 11:1977;1-8.
8. Han C.H., Johansson C.B., Wennerberg A., Albrektsson T. Quantitative and qualitative investigations of surface enlarged titanium and titanium alloy implants. Clin Oral Implant Res. 9:1998;1-10.
9. Johannson C.B., Han C.H., Wennerberg A., Albrektsson T. A quantitative comparison of machined commercially pure titanium and titanium-aluminum-vanadium implants in rabbit bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 13:1998;315-321.
10. Han C.H., Johannson C.B., Wennerberg A., Albrektsson T. Quantitative and qualitative investigations of surface enlarged titanium and titanium alloy implants. Clin Oral Implant Res. 9:1998;1-10.
11. Ivanoff C.J., Sennerby L., Johansson C., Rangert B., Lekholm U. Influence of implant diameters on the integration of screw implants. An experimental study in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 26:1997;141-148.
12. D'Lima D.D., Lemperle S.M., Chen P.C., Holmes R.E., Colwell C.W. Bone response to implant surface morphology. J Arthroplasty. 13:1998;928-934.
13. Klokkevold P.R., Nishimura R.D., Adachi M., Caputo A. Osseointegration enhanced by chemical etching of the titanium surface. A torque removal study in the rabbit. Clin Oral Implant Res. 8:1997;442-447.
14. Wie H., Hero H., Solheim T. Hot isostatic pressing-processed hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants. light microscopic and scanning electron microscopic investigation Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 13:1998;837-844.
15. Piatelli A., Corigliano M., Scarano A., Quaranta M. Bone reactions to early occlusal loading of two stage titanium plasma-sprayed implants. a pilot study in monkeys Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 17:1997;162-169.
16. Wennerberg A., Ektessabi A., Albrektsson T., Johansson C., Andersson B. A 1-year follow-up of implants of differing surface roughness placed in rabbit bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 12:1997;486-494.
17. Cole B.J., Bostrom M.P., Pritchard T.L., Sumner D.R., Tomin E., Lane J.M., Weiland A.J. Use of bone morphogenetic protein 2 on ectopic porous coated implants in the rat. Clin Orthop. 345:1997;219-228.
18. 3 J Biomed Mater Res. 41:1998;489-496.
19. ®-System. Z Zahnärztl Implantologie. 8:1992;77-96.
20. D'Lima D.D., Lemperle S.M., Chen P.C., Holmes R.E., Collwell C.W. Bone response to implant surface morphology. J Arthroplasty. 13:1998;928-934.
21. Klokkevold P.R., Nishimura R.D., Adachi M., Caputo A. Osseointegration enhanced by chemical etching of the titanium surface. A torque removal study in the rabbit. Clin Oral Implant Res. 8:1997;442-447.
22. Albrektsson T., Branemark P.L., Hansson H.A., Skalak R. The interface zone of inorganic implants in vivo. titanium implants in the bone Ann Biomed Eng. 11:1983;1.
23. Sutherland D.S., Forshaw P.D., Allen G.C., Brown I.T., Williams K.R. Surface analysis of titanium implants. Biomaterials. 14:1993;893-899.