Bone Tissue Response to Commercially Pure Titanium Implants Blasted with Fine and Coarse Particles of Aluminum Oxide

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 38-45

  Wennerberg, Ann ^a   Albrektsson, Tomas ^a   Andersson, Börje ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Histomorphometric evaluation; Mechanical evaluation; Surface roughness characterization; Three dimensional

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM OXIDE; TITANIUM;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BONE; BONE REGENERATION; BONE SCREW; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HISTOLOGY; MALE; MECHANICAL STRESS; PARTICLE SIZE; PHYSIOLOGY; RABBIT; ROTATION; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIBIA; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ALUMINUM OXIDE; ANIMALS; BONE AND BONES; BONE SCREWS; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; MALE; OSSEOINTEGRATION; PARTICLE SIZE; RABBITS; ROTATION; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIBIA; TITANIUM;

EID: 0029681619     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Kirsch A, Donath K. Tierexperimentelle untersuchungen zur bedentung der mikromorphologie von titanimplantatober-flächen. Fortschr Zahnärztl Implantol 1984;1:35-40.
2. Thomas KA, Cook SD. An evaluation of variables influencing implant fixation by direct bone apposition. J Biomed Mater Res 1985;19:875-901.
3. Gross U, Müller-Mai CH, Fritz T, Voigt C, Knarse W, Schmitz HJ. Implant surface roughness and mode of load transmission influence periimplant bone structure. In: Heimke G, Soltész U, Lee AJC (eds). Clinical Implant Materials: Advances in Biomaterials. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science. 1990;303-308.
4. Maniatopoulos C, Pilliar RM, Smith DC. Threaded versus porous-surfaced designs for implant stabilization in bone-endodontic implant model. J Biomed Mater Res 1986;20:1309-1333.
5. Predecki P, Auslaender BA, Stephan JE. Attachment of bone to threaded implants by ingrowth and mechanical interlocking. J Biomed Mater Res 1972;6:401-412.
6. Denissen HW, de Groot K, Makkes PC, van den Hoff A, Klopper PJ. Tissue response to dense apatite implants in rats. J Biomed Mater Res 1980;14:713-721.
7. Wilke H-J, Claes L, Steinemann S. The influence of Various titanium surfaces on the interface shear strength between implants and bone. In: Heimke G, Soltész U, Lee AJC (eds). Clinical Implant Materials: Advances in Biomaterials. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 1990;309-314.
8. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;25:889-902.
9. Block MS, Kent JN, Kay JF. Evaluation of hydroxyapatite-coated titanium dental implants in dogs. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1987;40:601-607.
10. Cook SD, Thomas KA, Kay JF, Jarcho M. Hydroxyapatite-coated titanium for orthopedic implant applications. Clin Orthop 1988;232:225-243.
11. Carlsson L, Regnér L, Johansson C, Gottlander M, Herberts P. Bone response to hydroxyapatite-coated and commercially pure titanium implants in the human arthritic knee. J Bone Joint Surg 1994;12:274-285.
12. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B, Krol JJ. A histomorphometric and removal torque study of screw-shaped titanium implants with three different surface topographies. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6:24-30.
13. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B. An animal study of cp titanium screws with different surface topographies. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1995;6:302-309.
14. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Johansson C, Andersson B. Experimental study of turned and grit blasted screw-shaped implants with special emphasis on effects of blasting material and surface topography. Biomaterials (in press).
15. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Ulrich H, Krol JJ. An optical three-dimensional technique for topographical descriptions of surgical implants. J Biomed Eng 1992;14:412-418.
16. Dong WP, Luo NL, Sullivan PJ, Stout KJ. A proposal of parameters for characterizing three-dimensional surface topography. For the EC project on 'Development of methods for the characterization of surface topography in three-dimensions.' EC Contract No. 3374/1/0/170/90/2. Birmingham, England: Centre for Metrology, 1992.
17. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B. Design and surface characteristics of 13 commercially available oral implant systems. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:622-633.
18. Donath K. Die trenn-dünnschliff-technik zur herstellung histologischer präparate von nicht schneidbared geweben und materialien. Der Präparator 1988;34:197-206.
19. Stout KJ, Sullivan PJ, Dong WP, Mainsah E, Luo N, Mathia T, Zahouani H. 'The development methods for the characterization of roughness in 3 dimensions.' Phase II report. EC Contract No. 3374/1/0/170/90/2, vol 2. Birmingham, England: Centre for Metrology, 1993.
20. Mummery L. Surface Texture Analysis: The Handbook. Mühlhausen, Germany: Hommelwerke GmbH, 1990:8-22.
21. Abbe T, Bienias M, Thiele K. Vergleich von filteralgorithmen am beispiel von rauheitsmessungen. PTB-Mitteilungen 1991;101:408-412.
22. Osborn JF, Willich P, Meenen N. The release of titanium into human bone from a titanium implant coated with plasma-sprayed titanium. In: Heimke G, Soltész U, Lee AJC (eds). Clinical Implant Materials: Advances in Biomaterials. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 1990:75-80.
23. Pan J, Leygraf C. Electrochemical characterization of the Ti samples with different treated surfaces (in manuscript).
24. Tsuboi V, Albrektsson T, Ektessabi A, Sennerby L, Wennerberg A. Soft tissue reponse to titanium implants manufactured with different surface topography (in manuscript).