Histologic evaluation of early human bone response to different implant surfaces

Journal of Periodontology

Volumn 77, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 1736-1743

  Grassi, Sauro ^a   Piattelli, Adriano ^b   de Figueiredo, Luciene Cristina ^a   Feres, Magda ^a   de Melo, Leandro ^a   Iezzi, Giovanna ^b   Alba Jr , Rodolfo Candia ^c   Shibli, Jamil Awad ^a  

^a GUARULHOS UNIVERSITY   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHIETI   (Italy)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Dental implants; Histology; Osseointegration; Titanium; Wound healing

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; BONE REGENERATION; BONE TISSUE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALING; HISTOLOGY; HISTOMETRY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MALE; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TOPOGRAPHY;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; AIR ABRASION, DENTAL; BONE DENSITY; BONE REMODELING; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; JAW, EDENTULOUS, PARTIALLY; MALE; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; MIDDLE AGED; OSSEOINTEGRATION; OSTEOBLASTS; OSTEOCYTES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 33750591646     PISSN: 00223492     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2006.050325     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Thomas K, Cook SD. Relationship between surface characteristics and the degree of bone-implant integration. J Biomed Mater Res 1992;26:831-833.
2. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H. influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;25:889-902.
3. Hallgren C, Sawase T, Ortengren U, Wennerberg A. Histomorphometric and mechanical evaluation of the bone-tissue response to implants prepared with different orientation of surface topography. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2001;3:194-203.
4. Jaffin RA, Berman CL. The excessive loss of Brånemark fixtures in type IV bone. A 5-year analysis. J Periodontol 1991;62:2-4.
5. Friberg B, Jemt T, Lekholm U. Early failures in 4,641 consecutively placed Brånemark dental implants. A study from stage I surgery to the connection of completed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:142-146.
6. Quirynen M, Naert I, van Steenberghe D, Teerlinck J, Dekeyser C, Theuniers G. Periodontal aspects of osseo-integrated fixtures supporting an overdenture. A 4-year retrospective study. J Clin Periodontol 1991;18: 719-728.
7. Kim YH, Koak JY, Chang IT, Wennerberg A, Heo SJ. A histomorphometric analysis of the effects of various surface treatment methods on osseointegration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:349-356.
8. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B, Kroll JJ. A histomorphometrical and removal torque study of screw-shaped titanium implants with three different surface topographies. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995; 6:24-30.
9. Wong M, Eulemberger J, Schenk RK, Hunziker E. Effect of surface topography on the osseointegration of implant materials in trabecular bone. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:1567-1575.
10. Matsuo M, Nakamura T, Kishi Y, Takahashi K. Microvascular changes after placement of titanium implants: Scanning electron microscopy observations of machined and titanium plasma-sprayed implants in dogs. J Periodontol 1999;70:1330-1338.
11. Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Lussi A, Higginbottom FL, Buser D. Bone response to unloaded and loaded titanium implant with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: A histometric study in the canine mandible. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;40:1-11.
12. Placko HE, Mishra S, Weimer JJ, Lucas LC. Surface characterization of titanium-based implant materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:355-363.
13. Trisi P, Lazarra R, Rebaudi A, Rao W, Testori T, Porter SS. Bone-implant contact on machined and dual acid-etched surfaces after 2 months of healing in the human maxilla. J Periodontol 2003;74:945-956.
14. Ivanoff CJ, Widmark G, Johansson C, Wennerberg A. Histologic evaluation of bone response to oxidized and turned titanium micro-implants in human jawbone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:341-348.
15. 2 blasted and turned titanium microimplants in human. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12: 128-134.
16. Degidi M, Petrone G, Iezzi G, Piattelli A. Bone contact around acid-etched implants: A histological and histomorphometrical evaluation of two human-retrieved implants. J Oral Implantol 2003;29:13-18.
17. Bolind PK, Johansson CB, Becker W, Langer L, Sevetz EB Jr., Albrektsson TO. A descriptive study on retrieved non-threaded and threaded implant designs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:447-455.
18. Piattelli A, Scarano A, Quaranta M. High-precision, cost-effective system for producing thin sections of oral tissues containing dental implants. Biomaterials 1997;18:577-579.
19. Den Braber ET, De Ruijter JE, Smits HTJ, Ginsel LA, von Recum AF, Jansen JA. Effect of parallel surface microgrooves and surface energy on cell growth. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:511-518.
20. Klokkevold PR, Johnson P, Dadgostari S, Caputo A, Davies JE, Nishimura RD. Early endosseous integration enhanced by dual acid etching of titanium: A torque removal study in the rabbit. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:350-357.
21. Buser D, Nydegg T, Oxland T, et al. Interface shear strength of titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid etched surface: A biomechanical study in the maxilla of miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1999; 45:75-83.
22. Trisi P, Keith DJ, Rocco S. Human histologic and histomorphometric analyses of hydroxyapatite-coated implants after 10 years of function: A case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:124-130.
23. Davies JE. Mechanisms of endosseous integration. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:391-401.
24. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Linder E, Lang NP, Lindhe J. The early bone formation adjacent to rough and turned endosseous implant surfaces. An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15:381-392.
25. Martin JY, Schwartz Z, Hummert TW, Schraub DM, Simpson J, Cochran DL. Effect of titanium surface roughness on proliferation, differentiation and protein synthesis of human osteoblast-like cells. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:389-401.
26. Schwartz Z, Lohmann CH, Oefinger J, Bonewald LF, Dean DD, Boyan BD. Implant surface characteristics modulate differentiation behavior of cells in the osteoblastic lineage. Adv Dent Res 1999;13:38-48.
27. D'Hoedt B. The influence of implant materials and material surfaces on blood clotting: A scanning electron microscopy study. In: van Steenberghe D, Albrektsson T, Brånemark PI, Henry PJ, Holt R, Linden C, eds. Tissue Integration in Oral and Maxillofacial Reconstruction. Proceedings of an International Congress, vol. 29. Madison, WI: Current Clinical Practice Series; 1985:46-50.
28. Meyer A, Baier R, Natiella J, Meenaghan M. Investigation of tissue/ implant interactions during the first two hours of implantation. J Oral Implantol 1988;14: 363-379.
29. Wen X, Wang X, Zhang N. Microrough surface of metallic biomaterials: A review. Biomed Mater Eng 1996;6:173-189.
30. Zechner W, Tangl S, Fürst G, et al. Osseous healing characteristics of three different implant types. A histological and histomorphometric study in minipigs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:150-157.
31. Schneider GB, Zaharias R, Seabold D, Keller J, Stanford C. Differentiation of preosteoblasts is affected by implant surface microtopographies. J Biomed Mater Res A 2004;69:462-468.
32. Schneider GB, Perinpanayagam H, Clegg M, et al. Implant surface roughness affects osteoblast gene expression. J Dent Res 2003;82:372-376.
33. Jemt T. Fixed implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous maxilla. A five-year follow-up report. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5:142-147.
34. Jemt T, Chai J, Harnett J, et al. A 5-year prospective multicenter follow-up report on overdentures supported by osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:291-298.
35. 2-blasted titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992;3:77-84.
36. 2-blasted, HA-coated, and machined implants: An experimental study in rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res 1995; 29:1223-1231.
37. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Johanson CB, Andersson B. Experimental study of turned and grit blasted screw-shaped implants with special emphasis on effects of blasting material and surface topography. Biomaterials 1996;17:15-22.
38. Abron A, Hopfensperger M, Thompson J, Cooper LF. Evaluation of a predictive model for implant surface topography effects on early osseointegration in the rat tibia model. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:40-46.
39. Buser D, Nydegger T, Hirt HP, Cochran DL, Nolte LP. Removal torque values of titanium implants in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:611-619.
40. Weng D, Hoffmeyer M, Hürzeler MB, Richter EJ. Osseotite vs. machined surface in poor bone quality. A study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14: 703-708.
41. Li D, Ferguson SJ, Beutler T, et al. Biomechanical comparison of the sandblasted and acid-etched and the machined and acid-etched titanium surface for dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;60:325-332.
42. Shibli JA, Grassi S, Figueiredo LC, et al. Influence of implant surface topography on early osseointegration. A histological study in human jaws. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2006; in press.