Etched Implants: A Comparative Surface Analysis of Four Implant Systems

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials

Volumn 69, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 46-57

  Szmukler Moncler, Serge ^a,b,c   Testori, T ^b   Bernard, J P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^c NONE   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Acid etching; Osseotite; Sandblasting; SLA; Surface treatment

Indexed keywords

DATA REDUCTION; DENTAL PROSTHESES; ETCHING; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE ROUGHNESS;

SURFACE ANALYSIS; SURFACE TEXTURING;

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING;

ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; DRUG INDUSTRY; ETCHED IMPLANT; IMPLANT; INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION; REPRODUCIBILITY; SAND; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOPOGRAPHY;

EID: 1642272832     PISSN: 00219304     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.20021     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann SG, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants: A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;25:889-902.
2. Szmukler-Moncler S, Reingewirtz Y, Weber HP. Bone response to early loading: The effect of surface state. In: Davidovitch Z, Norton LA, editors. Biological mechanisms of tooth movement & craniofacial adaptation. Boston: Harvard Society for the Advancement of Orthodontics; 1996. p 611-616.
3. Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Lussi A, Higginbottom FL, Buser D. Bone response to unloaded and loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: A histometric study in the canine mandible. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;40:1-11.
4. Szmukler-Moncler S, Perrin D, Ahossi V, Pointaire P. Evaluation of BONIT, a fully resorbable calcium phosphate (CaP) coating obtained by electrochemical deposition, after 6 weeks of healing: A pilot study in the pig maxilla. Key Eng Mater 2001;192-195:395-398.
5. Wilke HJ, Claes L, Steinemann S. The influence of various titanium surfaces on the interface shear strength between implants and bone. In: Heimke G, Soltész U, Lee AJC, editors. Clinical materials. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1990. p 309-314.
6. Wong M, Eulenberger J, Schenk R, Hunziker E. Effect of surface topology on the osseointegration of implant materials in trabecular bone. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:1567-1575.
7. Klokkevold PR, Johnson P, Dadgostari S, Caputo A, Davies JE, Nishimura RD. Early endosseous integration enhanced by dual acid etching of titanium: A removal torque study in the rabbit. Clin Oral Implant Res 2001;12:350-357.
8. Szmukler-Moncler, S, Perrin D, Bernard JP, Pointaire P. Biological properties of acid etched titanium surfaces: Effect of sandblasting on bone anchorage. J Biomed Mater Res Appl Biomater (in press).
9. Lazzara RJ, Testori T, Trisi P, Porter SS, Weinstein RL. A human histologic analysis of Osseotite and machined surfaces using implants with 2 opposing surfaces. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1999;19:3-16.
10. Baker DA, London RM, O'Neil RB. Rate of pull-out strength gain of dual-etched titanium implants: A comparative study in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998:14:722-728.
11. Lazzara RJ, Porter SS, Testori T, Galante J, Zetterquist LA. A prospective multicenter study evaluating loading of Osseotite implants two months after placement. J Esthet Dent 1998;10: 280-289.
12. Roccuzzo M, Bunino M, Prioglio F, Bianchi SD. Early loading of sandblasted and acid etched (SLA) implants: A prospective split-mouth comparative study. Clin Oral Implant Res 2001;12: 572-578.
13. Cochran DL, Buser D, ten Bruggenkate C, Weingart D, Taylor TM, Bernard JP, Simpson JP, Peters F. The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface. Early results from clinical trials on SLA implants. Clin Oral Implant Res 2002;13:144-153.
14. Testori T, Del Fabbro, M, Feldman S, Vincenzi G, Sullivan G, Rossi R Jr, Anitua E, Bianchi F, Francetti L, Weinstein RL. A multi-center prospective evaluation of 2-months loaded Osseotite implants in the posterior jaws: 3-year follow-up results. Clin Oral Implant Res 2002;13:154-161.
15. Schulte W, d'Hoedt D, Axman D, Gomez-Roman G. 15 Jahre tübinger implantat und seine weiterentwicklung zum frialit-2-system. Z Zahnarzt Implantol 1992;8:77-96.
16. Beaty KD. U.S. Patent No.5,876,453. Implant surface preparation; March 2, 1999.
17. Steinemann SG, Claes L. U.S. Patent No. 5,456,723. Metallic implant anchorable to bone tissue for replacing a broken or diseased bone; October 10, 1995.
18. Gomez-Roman G, Schulte W, d'Hoedt W, Axman-Kremar D. The Frialit-2 implant system: Five-year clinical experience in single tooth and immediately post-extraction applications. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:299-309.
19. Nedir R, Bischof M, Briaux JM, Beyer S, Szmukler-Moncler S, Bernard JP. A 7-year life table analysis from a prospective study on ITI implants with special emphasis on the use of short implants. Results from a private practice. Clin Oral Implant Res (in press).
20. Buser D, Nydegger T, Hirt HP, Cochran DL, Nolte LP. Removal torque values of titanium implants in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:611-619.
21. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Suggested guidelines for the topographic evaluation of implant surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:331-344.
22. Hansson S. Surface roughness parameters as predictors of anchorage strength in bone: a critical analysis. J Biomech 2000; 23:1297-1303.
23. Gotfredsen K, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Anchorage of titanium implants with different surface characteristics: An experimental study in rabbits. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2:120-128.
24. Chen CQL, Scott W, Barker TM. Effect of metal surface topography on mechanical bonding at simulated total hip stem-cement interfaces. J Biomed Mater Res Appl Biomater 1999; 48:440-446.
25. Arola DD, Yang DT, Stoffel KA. The apparent volume of interdigitation: A new parameter for evaluating the influence of surface topography on mechanical interlock. J Biomed Mater Res Appl Biomater 2001;58:519-524.
26. Testori T, Wiseman L, Woolfe S, Porter SS. A prospective multicenter clinical study of the Osseotite implant: Four-year interim report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:193-200.
27. Davies JE. Mechanisms of endosseous integration. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:391-401.
28. Gross U, Muller-Mai CM, Fritz T, Voigt C, Knarse W, Schmitz HJ. Implant surface roughness and mode of load transmission influence peri-implant bone structure. In: Heimke G, Soltész U, Lee AJC, editors. Clinical materials. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1990. p 303-308.
29. Muller-Mai CM, Voigt C, Gross U, Berger G. Bone development and bone structure depend on surface roughness and structure of metallic implants. In: Wise D, editor. Biomaterials and bioengineering handbook. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2000. p 457-481.
30. Van Oosterwyck H, Duyck J, Vander Sloten J, Van der Perre G, De Cooman M, Lievens S, Puers R, Naert I. The influence of bone mechanical properties and implant fixation upon bone loading around oral implants. Clin Oral Implant Res 1998;9: 407-418.
31. Bernard JP, Szmukler-Moncler S, Pessotto S, Vazquez L, Belser UC. The anchorage of Brånemark and ITI implants of various lengths. I. An experimental study in the canine mandible. Clin Oral Implant Res 2003;14:593-600.
32. Sennerby L, Thomsen P, Ericson LE. Ultrastructure of the bone-titanium interface in rabbits. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1992;3:262-271.
33. Lazzara R, Siddiqui AA, Binon P, Feldman SA, Weiner R, Philipps R. Gonshor A. Retrospective multicenter analysis of 3i endosseous dental implants placed over a 5-year period. Clin Oral Implant Res 1996;7:73-83.
34. Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (I). Success criteria and epidemiology. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106: 527-551.
35. Senneby L, Roos J. Surgical determinants of clinical success of osseointegrated implants: A review of literature. Int J Prosth 1998;11:408-420.
36. Buser D, Nydegger T, Oxland TR, Schenk RK, Cochran DL, Snétivy D, Nolte LP. The interface shear strength of titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface. A biomechanical study in the maxilla of miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;45:75-83.