The complex analytical landscape of gene flow inference

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 26, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 448-456

  Marko, Peter B ^a   Hart, Michael W ^b  

^a CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL METHOD; CONNECTIVITY; DEMOGRAPHIC HISTORY; ENDANGERED SPECIES; GENE FLOW; GENEALOGY; GENETIC VARIATION; LOCAL ADAPTATION; POPULATION MODELING; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION;

ANIMAL; GENE FLOW; GENETICS; LIZARD; METHODOLOGY; POPULATION GENETICS; REVIEW; SNAIL; STARFISH;

ANIMALS; GENE FLOW; GENETICS, POPULATION; LIZARDS; SNAILS; STARFISH;

EID: 80051473401     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.05.007     Document Type: Review

References (98)

1. Manel S., Segelbacher G. Perspectives and challenges in landscape genetics. Mol. Ecol. 2009, 18:1821-1822.
2. Holderegger R., Wagner H.H. Landscape genetics. Bioscience 2008, 58:199-207.
3. Sork V.L., Waits L. Contributions of landscape genetics-approaches, insights, and future potential. Mol. Ecol. 2010, 19:3489-3495.
4. Selkoe K.A., et al. Taking the chaos out of genetic patchiness: seascape genetics reveals ecological and oceanographic drivers of genetic patterns in three temperate reef species. Mol. Ecol. 2010, 19:3708-3726.
5. Slatkin M. Gene flow in natural populations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1985, 16:393-430.
6. Slatkin M. Gene flow and the geographic structure of natural populations. Science 1987, 236:787-792.
7. Mallet J. Gene flow. Insect Movement: Mechanisms and Consequences 2001, 337-360. CAB International. I.P. Woiwod (Ed.).
8. Marko P.B., Barr K.B. Basin-scale patterns of mtDNA differentiation and gene flow in the Bay Scallop, Argopecten irradians concentricus Say. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2007, 349:139-150.
9. Keever C.C., et al. Discordant distribution of populations and genetic variation in a sea star with high dispersal potential. Evolution 2009, 63:3214-3227.
10. Hart M.W., Marko P.B. It's about time: divergence, demography, and the evolution of developmental modes in marine invertebrates. Integr. Comp. Biol. 2010, 50:643-661.
11. McGovern T.M., et al. Divergence genetics analysis reveals historical population genetic processes leading to contrasting phylogeographic patterns in co-distributed species. Mol. Ecol. 2010, 19:5043-5060.
12. Nielsen R., Wakeley J. Distinguishing migration from isolation: a Markov chain Monte Carlo approach. Genetics 2001, 158:885-896.
13. Hey J., Nielsen R. Multilocus methods for estimating population sizes, migration rates and divergence time, with applications to the divergence of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. Genetics 2004, 167:747-760.
14. Hey J., Nielsen R. Integration within the Felsenstein equation for improved Markov chain Monte Carlo methods in population genetics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:2785-2790.
15. Becquet C., Przeworski M. A new approach to estimate parameters of speciation models with application to apes. Genome Res. 2007, 17:1505-1519.
16. Anderson C.N.K., et al. Serial SimCoal: a population genetic model for data from multiple populations and points in time. Bioinformatics 2005, 21:1733-1734.
17. Huang W., et al. MTML-msBayes: approximate Bayesian comparative phylogeographic inference from multiple taxa and multiple loci with rate heterogeneity. BMC Bioinform. 2011, 12:1-14.
18. Jobin M.J., Mountain J.L. Rejector: software for population history inference from genetic data via a rejection algorithm. Bioinformatics 2008, 24:2936-2937.
19. Lopes J.S., et al. PopABC: a program to infer historical demographic parameters. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:2747-2749.
20. Kuhner M.K. Coalescent genealogy samplers: windows into population history. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2009, 24:86-93.
21. Beaumont M.A., et al. In defense of model-based inference in phylogeography. Mol. Ecol. 2010, 19:436-446.
22. Hickerson M.J., et al. Phylogeography's past, present, and future: 10 years after Avise, 2000. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2010, 54:291-301.
23. Pearse D.E., Crandall K.A. Beyond FST: analysis of population genetic data for conservation. Conserv. Genet. 2004, 5:585-602.
24. Fagundes N.J.R., et al. Statistical evaluation of alternative models of human evolution. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:17614-17619.
25. Evans, et al. A coalescent framework for comparing alternative models of population structure with genetic data: evolution of Celebes toads. Biol. Lett. 2008, 4:430-433.
26. Lopes J.S., Boessenkool S. The use of approximate Bayesian computation in conservation genetics and its application in a case study on yellow-eyed penguins. Conserv. Genet. 2010, 11:421-433.
27. Reagon M., et al. Genomic patterns of nucleotide diversity in divergent populations of U.S. weedy rice. BMC Evol. Biol. 2010, 10:180-196.
28. Grosberg R.K., Cunningham C.W. Genetic structure in the sea: from populations to communities. Marine Community Ecology 2001, 61-84. Sinauer Associates. M.D. Bertness (Ed.).
29. Crisp D.J. Genetic consequences of different reproductive strategies in marine invertebrates. NATO Conf. Ser. IV Mar. Sci. 1978, 2:257-273.
30. Burton R.S. Protein polymorphisms and genetic differentiation of marine invertebrate populations. Mar. Biol. Lett. 1983, 4:193-206.
31. Hickerson M.J., Cunningham C.W. Contrasting Quaternary histories in an ecologically divergent sister pair of low-dispersing intertidal fish (Xiphister) revealed by multilocus DNA analysis. Evolution 2005, 59:344-360.
32. Marko P.B., et al. The expansion-contraction model of Pleistocene demography: rocky shores suffer a sea change?. Mol. Ecol. 2010, 19:146-169.
33. Teske P.R., et al. Connectivity between marine reserves and exploited areas in the philopatric reef fish Chrysoblephus laticeps (Teleostei: Sparidae). Mar. Biol. 2010, 156:2029-2042.
34. Cowen R.K., Sponaugle S. Larval dispersal and marine population connectivity. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 2009, 1:443-466.
35. Pelc R.A., et al. Geographical patterns of genetic structure in marine species with contrasting life histories. J. Biogeogr. 2009, 36:1881-1890.
36. Chan L.M., et al. The scale of genetic differentiation in the Dunes Sagebrush-Lizard (Sceloporus arenicolus), an endemic habitat specialist. Conserv. Genet. 2009, 10:131-142.
37. Waples R.S., Gaggiotti O. What is a population? An empirical evaluation of some genetic methods for identifying the number of gene pools and their degree of connectivity. Mol. Ecol. 2006, 15:1419-1439.
38. Lowe W.H., Allendorf F.W. What can genetics tell us about population connectivity?. Mol. Ecol. 2010, 19:3038-3051.
39. Wares J.P. Community genetics in the northwestern Atlantic intertidal. Mol. Ecol. 2002, 11:1131-1144.
40. Avise J.C. Gene trees and organismal histories: a phylogenetic approach to population biology. Evolution 1989, 43:1192-1208.
41. Hare M.P. Prospects for nuclear gene phylogeography. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2001, 16:700-706.
42. Zink R.M., Barrowclough G.F. Mitochondrial DNA under siege in avian phylogeography. Mol. Ecol. 2008, 17:2107-2121.
43. Edwards S., Bensch S. Looking forwards or looking backwards in avian phylogeography?. A comment on Zink and Barrowclough 2008. Mol. Ecol. 2009, 18:2930-2933.
44. Brito P.H., Edwards S.V. Multilocus phylogeography and phylogenetics using sequence-based markers. Genetica 2009, 135:439-455.
45. Hedrick P.W. Perspective: highly variable loci and their interpretation in evolution and conservation. Evolution 1999, 53:313-318.
46. Hedrick P.W. A standardized genetic differentiation measure. Evolution 2005, 59:1633-1638.
47. Ellegren H. Microsatellites: simple sequences with complex evolution. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2004, 5:435-445.
48. Strasburg J.L., Rieseberg L.H. How robust are 'isolation with migration' analyses to violations of the IM model? A simulation study. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2009, 27:297-310.
49. Rannala B., Yang Z. Bayes estimation of species divergence times and ancestral population sizes using DNA sequences from multiple loci. Genetics 2003, 164:1645-1656.
50. Yang Z. Likelihood and Bayes estimation of ancestral population sizes in hominoids using data from multiple loci. Genetics 2002, 162:1811-1823.
51. Jennings W.B., Edwards S.V. Speciational history of Australian grass finches (Poephila) inferred from thirty gene trees. Evolution 2005, 59:2033-2047.
52. Carstens B.C., Knowles L.L. Shifting distributions and speciation: species divergence during rapid climate change. Mol. Ecol. 2007, 16:619-627.
53. Maddison W.P. Molecular approaches and the growth of phylogenetic biology. Molecular Zoology: Advances, Strategies, and Protocols 1996, 47-63. Wiley-Liss. J.D. Ferraris, S.R. Palumbi (Eds.).
54. Roderick G.K. Geographic structure of insect populations: gene flow, phylogeography, and their uses. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1996, 41:325-352.
55. Galindo H.M., et al. Seascape genetics: a coupled oceanographic-genetic model predicts population structure of Caribbean corals. Curr. Biol. 2006, 16:1622-1626.
56. Loveless M.D., Hamrick J.L. Ecological determinants of genetic structure of plant populations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1984, 15:65-95.
57. Hamrick J.L., Godt M.J. Allozyme diversity in plant species. Plant Population Genetics, Breeding and Germplasm Resources 1989, 43-63. Sinauer Associates. A.H.D. Brown (Ed.).
58. Bohonak A.J. Dispersal, gene flow, and population structure. Quart. Rev. Biol. 1999, 74:21-45.
59. Tatarenkov A., et al. Microgeographic population structure of green swordtail fish: Genetic differentiation despite abundant migration. Mol. Ecol. 2010, 19:257-268.
60. Wang Y., Hey J. Estimating divergence parameters with small samples from a large number of loci. Genetics 2010, 184:363-379.
61. Wright S. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations. Variability Within and Between Populations 1969, Vol. 4. University of Chicago Press.
62. Slatkin M., Barton N.H. A comparison of three indirect methods for estimating average levels of gene flow. Evolution 1989, 43:1349-1368.
63. Neigel J.E., et al. Estimation of single generation migration distances from geographic variation in animal mitochondrial DNA. Evolution 1991, 45:423-432.
64. Slatkin M. Isolation by distance in equilibrium and nonequilibrium populations. Evolution 1993, 47:264-279.
65. Bossart J.L., Prowell D.P. Genetic estimates of population structure and gene flow: limitations, lessons and new directions. Trends. Ecol. Evol. 1998, 13:202-206.
66. Whitlock M.C., McCauley D.E. Short review: Indirect measures of gene flow-FST does not equal 1/(4Nm+1). Heredity 1999, 82:117-125.
67. Neigel J.E. Is FST obsolete?. Conserv. Genet. 2002, 3:167-173.
68. Hellberg M.E. Relationships between inferred levels of gene flow and geographic distance in a philopatric coral, Balanophyllia elegans. Evolution 1994, 48:1829-1854.
69. Hutchison D.W., Templeton A.R. Correlation of pairwise genetic and geographic distance measures: inferring the relative influences of gene flow and drift on the distribution of genetic variability. Evolution 1999, 53:1898-1914.
70. Hedgecock D., et al. Genetic approaches to measuring connectivity. Oceanography 2007, 20:70-79.
71. Hanski I., Simberloff D. The metapopulation approach, its history, conceptual domain and application to conservation. Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution 1997, 5-26. Academic Press. I.A. Hanski, M.E. Gilpin (Eds.).
72. Marine Metapopulations 2006, Academic Press. J.P. Kritzer, P.F. Sale (Eds.).
73. Wade M.J., McCauley D.E. Extinction and recolonization: their effects on the genetic differentiation of local populations. Evolution 1988, 42:995-1005.
74. Whitlock M.C., McCauley D.E. Some population genetic consequences of colony formation and extinction: genetic correlations within founding groups. Evolution 1990, 44:1717-1724.
75. Giles B.E., Goudet J. A case study of genetic structure in a plant metapopulation. Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution 1997, 429-454. Academic Press. I. Hanski, M. Gilpin (Eds.).
76. Pannell J.R., Charlesworth B. Neutral genetic diversity in a metapopulation with recurrent local extinction and recolonization. Evolution 1999, 53:664-667.
77. Pannell J.R. Coalescence in a metapopulation with recurrent local extinction and recolonization. Evolution 2003, 57:949-961.
78. Wakeley J. Metapopulation models for historical inference. Mol. Ecol. 2004, 13:865-875.
79. Ewens W.J. Population genetics theory-the past and the future. Mathematical and Statistical Developments of Evolutionary Theory 1990, 177-227. Kluwer Academic. S. Lessard (Ed.).
80. Avise J.C. Molecular Markers, Natural History and Evolution 2004, Sinauer. 2nd edn.
81. Wakeley J. Coalescent Theory: An Introduction 2008, Roberts & Co.
82. Holsinger K.E., Weir B.S. Genetics in geographically structured populations: defining, estimating and interpreting FST. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2009, 10:639-650.
83. Anderson C.D., et al. Considering spatial and temporal scale in landscape-genetic studies of gene flow. Mol. Ecol. 2010, 19:3565-3575.
84. Storfer A., et al. Landscape genetics: where are we now?. Mol. Ecol. 2010, 19:3495-3514.
85. Cornuet J.M., et al. New methods employing multilocus genotypes to select or exclude populations as origins of individuals. Genetics 1999, 153:1989-2000.
86. Pritchard J.K., et al. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 2000, 155:945-959.
87. Wilson G.A., Rannala B. Bayesian inference of recent migration rates using multilocus genotypes. Genetics 2003, 163:1177-1191.
88. Yu H., et al. Slatkin's paradox: when direct observation and realized gene flow disagree. A case study in Ficus. Mol. Ecol. 2010, 19:4441-4453.
89. Jones A. Reconciling field observations of dispersal with estimates of gene flow. Mol. Ecol. 2010, 19:4379-4382.
90. McKechnie S.W., et al. Population genetics of Euphydryas butterflies. I. Genetic variation and the neutrality hypothesis. Genetics 1975, 81:571-594.
91. Ahmed S., et al. Wind-borne insects mediate directional pollen transfer between desert fig trees 160 kilometers apart. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:20342-20347.
92. Ashley M.V. Plant parentage, pollination, and dispersal, how DNA microsatellites have altered the landscape. Crit. Rev. Plant. Sci. 2010, 29:14-161.
93. Taneyhill D.E., et al. Estimating rates of gene flow in endemic butterfly races: the effect of metapopulation dynamics. Genes in the Environment: 15th Special Symposium of the British Ecological Society 2001, 3-25. British Ecological Society. S. Hails (Ed.).
94. Marko P.B., Hart M.W. Retrospective coalescent methods and the reconstruction of metapopulation histories in the sea. Evol. Ecol. 2011, 10.1007/s10682-011-9467-9.
95. Kelly R.P., Palumbi S.R. Genetic structure among 50 species of the northeastern Pacific rocky intertidal community. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:pe8594.
96. Wares J.P., Cunningham C.W. Phylogeography and historical ecology of the North Atlantic intertidal. Evolution 2001, 55:2455-2469.
97. Beerli P. Effect of unsampled populations on the estimation of population sizes and migration rates between sampled populations. Mol. Ecol. 2004, 13:827-836.
98. Slatkin M. Seeing ghosts: the effect of unsampled populations on migration rates estimated for sampled populations. Mol. Ecol. 2005, 14:67-73.