InParanoid 6: Eukaryotic ortholog clusters with inparalogs

Nucleic Acids Research

Volumn 36, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2008, Pages

  Berglund, Ann Charlotte ^a   Sjölund, Erik ^b   Östlund, Gabriel ^b   Sonnhammer, Erik L L ^b  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEOME;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GENE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; EUKARYOTE; GENE DUPLICATION; GENETIC DATABASE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INPARANOID DATABASE; INTERNET; MARKUP LANGUAGE; NONHUMAN; ORTHOLOGY; PARALOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; SPECIES DIVERSITY;

ANIMALS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DATABASES, PROTEIN; GENE DUPLICATION; HUMANS; INTERNET; PHYLOGENY; PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS;

ESCHERICHIA COLI; EUKARYOTA;

EID: 38549122308     PISSN: 03051048     EISSN: 13624962     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkm1020     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Fitch, W.M. (1970) Distinguishing homologous from analogous proteins. Syst. Zool., 19, 99-113.
2. Sonnhammer, E.L.L. and Koonin, E.V. (2002) Orthology, paralogy and proposed classification for paralog subtypes. Trends Genet., 18 619-620.
3. Remm, M., Storm, C.E.V. and Sonnhammer, E.L.L. (2001) Automatic clustering of orthologs and In-paralogs from pairwise species comparisons. J. Mot. Behav., 314, 1041-1052.
4. O'Brien, Remm, M and Sonnhammer, E.L.L. (2005) Inparanoid: A comprehensive database of eukaryotic orthologs. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, D476-D480.
5. Alexeyenko, A., Lindberg, J., Perez-Bercoff, A. and Sonnhammer, E.L.L. (2006) Overview and comparison of ortholog databases. Drug Discovery Today: Technol., 3, 137-143.
6. Tatusov, R.L., Fedorova, N.D., Jackson, J.D., Jacobs, A.R., Kiryutin, B., Koonin, E.V., Krylov, D.M., Mazumder, R., Mekhedov, S.L. et al. (2003) The COG database: An updated version includes eukaryotes. BMC Bioinformatics, 4, 41.
7. Dessimoz, C., Boeckmann, B., Roth, A.C. and Gonnet, G.H. (2006) Detecting non-orthology in the COGs database and other approaches grouping orthologs using genome-specific best hits. Nucleic Acids Res., 34, 3309-3316.
8. Wheeler, D.L., Barrett, T., Benson, D.A., Bryant, S.H., Canese, K., Chetvernin, V., Church, D.M., DiCuccio, M., Edgar, R. et al. (2007) Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res., 35, D5-D12.
9. Hulsen, T., Huynen, M.A., de Vlieg, J. and Groenen, P.M. (2006) Benchmarking ortholog identification methods using functional genomics data. Genome Biol., 7, R31.
10. Chen, F., Mackey, A.J., Vermunt, J.K. and Roos, D.S. (2007) Assessing performance of orthology detection strategies applied to eukaryotic genomes. PLoS ONE, 2, e383.
11. Dujon, B., Sherman, D., Fischer, G., Durrens, P., Casaregola, S., Lafontaine, I., De Montigny, J., Marck, C., Neuveglise, C. et al. (2004) Genome evolution in yeasts. Nature, 439, 35-44.
12. Chimpanzee Sequencing and Analysis Consortium (2005) Initial sequence of the chimpanzee genome and comparison with the human genome. Nature 437, 69-87.