Investigating the role of response in spatial context learning

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 64, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1563-1579

  Makovski, Tal ^a   Jiang, Yuhong V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Contextual cueing; Eye movement; Perception and action; Touch response; Visual search

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; ORIENTATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; ORIENTATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SPACE PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79961073176     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2011.564291     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Abrams, R. A., Davoli, C. C., Du, F., Knapp, W. K., & Paull, D. (2008). Altered vision near the hands. Cognition, 107, 1035-1047.
2. Allport, D. A. (1989). Visual attention. In M. I. Posner (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science (pp. 631-682). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Aston-Jones, G., Rajkowski, J., Kubiak, P., & Alexinsky, T. (1994). Locus coeruleus neurons in monkey are selectively activated by attended cues in a vigilance task. Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 4467-4480.
4. Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617-645.
5. Beck, D. M., Rees, G., Frith, C. D., & Lavie, N. (2001). Neural correlates of change detection and change blindness. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 645-650.
6. Brady, T. F., & Chun, M. M. (2007). Spatial constraints on learning in visual search: Modeling contextual cuing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 798-815.
7. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.
8. Buttaccio, R., & Hahn, S. (2010). The effect of behavioral response on affective evaluation. Acta Psychologica, 135, 343-348.
9. Chua, K.-P., & Chun, M. M. (2003). Implicit scene learning is view point dependent. Perception and Psychophysics, 65, 72-80.
10. Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. H. (1998). Contextual-cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28-71.
11. Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1999). Top-down attentional guidance based on implicit learning of visual covariation. Psychological Science, 10, 360-365.
12. Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (2003). Implicit, long-term spatial contextual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 29, 224-234.
13. Clayton, E. C., Rajkowski, J., Cohen, J. D., & Aston-Jones, G. (2004). Phasic activation of monkey locus coeruleus neurons by simple decisions in a forcedchoice task. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 9914-9920.
14. Dennis, N. A., Howard, J. H., Jr., & Howard, D. V. (2006). Implicit sequence learning without motor sequencing in young and old adults. Experimental Brain Research, 175, 153-164.
15. Dixon, M. L., Zelazo, P. D., & De Rosa, E. (2010). Evidence for intact memory-guided attention in school-aged children. Developmental Science, 13, 161-169.
16. Duncan, J. (1985). Visual search and visual attention. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention & Performance XI (pp. 85-106). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2001). Effect anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology; Human Perception and Performance, 27, 229-240.
18. Fiser, J. Z., & Aslin, R. N. (2002). Statistical learning of higher-order temporal structure from visual shape sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 28, 458-467.
19. Forster, J., & Stark, F. (1996). Influence of overt head movements on memory for valenced words: A case of conceptual-motor compatibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 421-430.
20. Geyer, T., Shi, Z., & Müller, H. J. (2010). Contextual cueing in multiconjunction visual search is dependent on color- and configuration-based intertribal contingencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 515-532.
21. Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences, 15, 20-25.
22. Hommel, B., Alonso, D., & Fuentes, L. J. (2006). Acquisition and generalization of action effects. Visual Cognition, 10, 965-986.
23. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849-937.
24. Jiang, Y., Olson, I. R., & Chun, M. M. (2000). Organization of visual-short term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 683-702.
25. Jiang, Y., & Song, J. H. (2005). Spatial context learning in visual search and change detection. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 1128-1139.
26. Jiang, Y., & Wagner, L. C. (2004). What is learned in spatial contextual cueing: Configuration or individual locations? Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 454-463.
27. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility-a model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
28. Kühn, S., & Brass, M. (2010). The cognitive representation of intending not to act: Evidence for specific non-action-effect binding. Cognition, 117, 9-16.
29. Kunar, M. A., Flusberg, S., Horowitz, T. S, & Wolfe, J. M. (2007). Does contextual cueing guide the deployment of attention? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 816-828.
30. le Dantec, C. C., & Seitz, A. R. (2010, November). Perceptual learning and contextual learning of a visual search, Poster presented at the Society for Neuroscience conference, San Diego, CA.
31. MacLeod, C. M., Gopie, N, Hourihan, K. L., Neary, K. R., & Ozubko, J. D. (2010). The production effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 671-685.
32. Makovski, T., Swallow, K. M., & Jiang, Y. V. (in press). Attending to unrelated targets boosts short-term memory for color arrays. Neuropsychologia.
33. Makovski, T., Vazquez, G. A., & Jiang, Y. V. (2008). Visual learning in multiple-object tracking. PLoS ONE, 3(5), e2228.
34. Miller, J. (1988). Components of the location probability effect in visual search tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 453-471.
35. Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (2006). The visual brain in action (p. 2). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
36. Nakayama, K., & Mackeben, M. (1989). Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention. Vision Research, 29(11), 1631-1647.
37. Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1-32.
38. Olson, I. R., & Chun, M. M. (2002). Perceptual constraints on implicit learning of spatial context. Visual Cognition, 9, 273-302.
39. Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming number into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442.
40. Peterson, M. S., & Kramer, A. F. (2001). Attentional guidance of the eyes by contextual information and abrupt onsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1239-1249.
41. Reber, A. S. (1989). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 219-235.
42. Remillard, G. (2003). Pure perceptual-based sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 581-597.
43. Ress, D., & Heeger, D. J. (2003). Neuronal correlates of perception in early visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 414-420.
44. Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L., Dascola, I., & Umiltá, C. (1987). Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia, 25, 31-40.
45. Seitz, A. R., & Watanabe, T. (2003). Is subliminal learning really passive? Nature, 422, 36.
46. Shen, Y. J., & Jiang, Y. V. (2006). Interrupted visual searches reveal volatile search memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 32, 1208-1220.
47. Song, J. H., & Nakayama, K. (2009). Hidden cognitive states revealed in choice reaching tasks. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 360-366.
48. Stock, A., & Stock, C. (2004). A short history of ideomotor action. Psychological Research, 68, 176-188.
49. Swallow, K. M., & Jiang, Y. V. (2010). Attentional boost effect: Transient increases in attention to one task enhance performance in a second task. Cognition, 115, 115-132.
50. Swallow, K. M., & Jiang, Y. V. (2011). The role of timing in the attentional boost effect. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 389-404.
51. Swallow, K.M., & Zacks, J. M. (2008). Sequences learned without awareness can orient attention during the perception of human activity. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15, 116-122.
52. Swallow, K. M., Zacks, J. M., & Abrams, R. A. (2009). Event boundaries in perception affect memory encoding and updating. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 236-257.
53. Turk-Browne, N. B., Junge, J. A., & Scholl, B. J. (2005). The automaticity of visual statistical learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 552-564.
54. Umemoto, A., Scolari, M., Vogel, E. K., & Awh, E. (2010). Statistical learning induces discrete shifts in the allocation of working memory resources. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1419-1429.
55. Vaidya, C. J., Huger, M., Howard, D. V., & Howard, J. H., Jr. (2007). Developmental differences in implicit learning of spatial context. Neuropsychology, 21, 497-506.
56. Willingham, D. B. (1999). Implicit motor sequence learning is not purely perceptual. Memory and Cognition, 27, 561-572.
57. Ziessler, M., & Nattkemper, D. (2001). Learning of event sequences is based on response-effect learning: Further evidence from serial reaction task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 595-613.