The linguistic turn within curriculum theory

Pedagogy, Culture and Society

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 193-206

  Englund, Tomas ^a  

^a ÖREBRO UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Communicative practice; Curriculum theory; Deliberation; Habermas; Linguistic turn; Performative function; Rorty

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960898432     PISSN: 14681366     EISSN: 17475104     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14681366.2011.582256     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Achtenhagen, F., J. Bjerg, N. Entwistle, T. Popkewitz, L. Vislie, K. Rosengren, and B. Öhngren, eds. 1997. An evaluation of Swedish research in education. Stockholm: HSFR/Swedish Council for Research in the Humanities and Social Sciences.
2. Austin, J., 1955/1975. How to do things with words, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Bergh, A. 2010. Vad gör kvalitetsbegreppet med utbildning? [What does the concept of quality do to education?] Örebro Studies in Education. Örebro: Örebro Studies in Education 29.
4. Benhabib, S. 1992. Situating the self: Gender, community and postmodernism in contemporary ethics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
5. Bernstein, R. 1983. Beyond objectivism and relativism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
6. Bernstein, R. 1986. Philosophical profiles. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
7. Bernstein, R. 1987. The varieties of pluralism. American Journal of Education 95: 509-33.
8. Biesta, G. 2006. 'Of all affairs, communication is the most wonderful'. The communicative turn in Dewey's Democracy and Education. In John Dewey and our educational prospect. A critical engagement with Dewey's Democracy and Education, ed. D. Hansen, 23-37. Albany: State University of New York Press.
9. Biesta, G. 2007. Den kommunikativa vändningen i Dewey's Demokrati och utbildning [The communicative turn in Dewey's Democracy and Education]. In Utbildning som kommunikation. Deliberativa samtal som möjlighet [Education as communication. Deliberative communication as a possibility], ed. T. Englund, 33-50. Göteborg: Daidalos.
10. Brandom, R. 2000. Introduction. In Rorty and his critics, ed. R. Brandon, ix-x. Oxford: Blackwell.
11. Dewey, J. 1916/1985. Democracy and education. In John Dewey. The middle works 1899-1924, vol. 9, 1-384, ed. J. Boydston. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
12. Dewey, J. 1927/1988. The public and its problems. In John Dewey. The later works 1925-1953, ed. J.Boydston. vol. 2, 235-372, Carbondale: Southern Illinois Press.
13. Englund, T. 1996. The public and the text. Journal of Curriculum Studies 28: 1-35.
14. Englund, T. 1997. Towards a dynamic analysis of the content of schooling: Narrow and broad didactics in Sweden. Journal of Curriculum Studies 29: 267-87.
15. Englund, T. 1999a. Talet om likvärdighet i svensk utbildningspolitik [The discourse on equivalence in Swedish educational policy]. In Textanalys [Text analysis], ed. C.-A. Säfström, and L. Östman, 325-46. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
16. Englund, T. 1999b. Om John Dewey och Demokrati och utbildning [About John Dewey and Democracy and Education]. In John Dewey, Demokrati och utbildning [Democracy and education], 11-32. Göteborg: Daidalos.
17. Englund, T. 2000a. Rethinking democracy and education: Towards an education of deliberative citizens. Journal of Curriculum Studies 32: 305-13.
18. Englund, T. 2000b. Deliberativa samtal som värdegrund - historiska perspektiv och aktuella förutsättningar [Deliberative communication as a value foundation-Historical perspectives and current preconditions]. Stockholm: Skolverket [National Agency for Education].
19. Englund, T. 2005. The discourse on equivalence in Swedish educational policy. Journal of Educational Policy 20, no. 1: 39-57.
20. Englund, T. 2006. Deliberative communication-A pragmatist proposal. Journal of Curriculum Studies 38: 503-520.
21. Englund, T. 2007a. Is there a future for (Swedish) curriculum theory? In Curriculum theory revisited, ed. E. Forsberg, 31-41. Studies in Educational Policy and Educational Philosophy, research report no. 10. Uppsala: Studies in Educational Policy and Educational Philosophy.
22. Englund, T., ed. 2007b. Utbildning som kommunikation. Deliberativa samtal som möjlighet [Education as communication. Deliberative communication as a possibility]. Göteborg: Daidalos.
23. Englund, T. 2008. The university as an encounter for deliberative communication. Creating cultural citizenship and professional responsibility. Utbildning & Demokrati-tidskrift för didaktik och utbildningspolitik [Education & Democracy-Journal for Didactics and Educational Policy] 17, no. 2: 97-114.
24. Englund, T. and A. Quennerstedt, eds. 2008a. Vadå likvärdighet? Studier i utbildningspolitisk språkanvändning [What about equivalence? Studies in the use of language in educational policy]. Göteborg: Daidalos.
25. Englund, T., and A. Quennerstedt. 2008b. Linking curriculum theory and linguistics: The performative use of 'equivalence' as an educational policy concept. Journal of Curriculum Studies 40: 713-24.
26. Englund, T., J. Öhman, and L. Östman. 2008. Deliberative communication for sustainability-A Habermas-inspired approach. In Sustainability and security within liberal societies, ed. S. Gough, and A. Stables, 29-48. London: Routledge.
27. Englund, T., and T. Solbrekke. 2009. How to analyse professional responsibility in a climate of accountability? Towards a conceptual framework. Paper presented at the European Conference on Educational Research (ECER) in Network 2: Vocational Education and Training (VETNET), September 28-30, in Vienna.
28. Gundem, B., and S. Hopmann, eds. 1998. Didaktik and/or curriculum. An international dialogue. New York: Peter Lang.
29. Gutmann, A. 1987. Democratic education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30. Gutmann, A., and D. Thompson. 1996. Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
31. Habermas, J. 1987. The theory of communicative action. Vol. II, Lifeworld and system. Boston: Beacon Press.
32. Habermas, J. 1990. The philosophical discourse on modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
33. Habermas, J. 1996. Between facts and norms. Contributions to discourse theory of law. Cambridge: Polity Press.
34. Habermas, J. 2000. Richard Rorty's pragmatic turn. In Rorty and his critics, ed. R. Brandom, 31-55. Oxford: Blackwell.
35. Hoel, T. 2001. Skriva och samtala Lärande genom responsgrupper [Writing and conversing. Learning through response groups]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
36. Hopmann, S. and K. Riquarts, eds. 1995. Didaktik and/or curriculum. Kiel: IPN.
37. Ljunggren, C. 1996. Medborgarpubliken och det offentliga rummet Om utbildning, medier och demokrati [The public and its need to define itself On education, the media and democracy] Uppsala Studies in Education, no. 68. Uppsala: Uppsala Studies in Education.
38. Mannheim, K. 1968. Essays on the sociology of knowledge. London: Routledge.
39. Morawski, J. 2010. Mellan frihet och kontroll. Om läroplanskonstruktioner i svensk skola. [Between freedom and control. Constructions of curricula in Swedish schools] Örebro Studies in Education, no. 28. Örebro: Örebro Studies in Education.
40. Nussbaum, M. 1997. Cultivating humanity. A classical defense of reform in liberal education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41. Palonen, K. 2003. Quentin Skinner History, politics, rhetoric. Cambridge: Polity Press.
42. Pinar, W., W. Reynolds, P. Slattery, and P. Taubman. 1995. Understanding curriculum: An introduction to the study of historical and contemporary curriculum discourses. New York: Peter Lang.
43. Popkewitz, T. 1997. The curriculum theory tradition: Studies in the socio/cultural and political contexts of pedagogical practices. In An evaluation of Swedish research in education, F. Achtenhagen, J. Bjerg, N. Entwistle, T. Popkewitz, L. Vislie, K. Rosengren, and B. Öhngren, 42-67. Stockholm: HSFR/Swedish Council for Research in the Humanities and Social Sciences.
44. Putnam, H. 1991. A reconsideration of Deweyan democracy. In Pragmatism in law and society, ed. M. Brint, and W. Weaver, 217-43. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
45. Rorty, R., ed. 1967. The linguistic turn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
46. Rorty, R. 1982. Consequences of pragmatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
47. Rorty, R. 1989. Contingency, irony and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48. Rorty, R. 2000. Universality and truth. In Rorty and his critics, ed. R. Brandom, 1-30. Oxford: Blackwell.
49. Searle, J. 1979. Expression and meaning Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50. Solbrekke, T.D., and T. Englund. 2011. Bringing professional responsibility back in. Studies in Higher Education 7. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2010.482205.
51. Tully, J., ed. 1988. Meaning and contex. Quentin Skinner and his critics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
52. Wahlström, N. 2010. Learning to communicate or communicating to learn? A conceptual discussion on communication, meaning, and knowledge. Journal of Curriculum Studies 42: 431-49.
53. Westbury, I., S. Hopmann, and K. Riquarts, eds. 2000. Teaching as reflective practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.