Measuring strategy use with self-report instruments: Theoretical and empirical considerations

Metacognition and Learning

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 83-90

  Schellings, Gonny ^a   van Hout Wolters, Bernadette ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Assessment methods; Learning strategies

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960716240     PISSN: 15561623     EISSN: 15561631     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11409-011-9081-9     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Aarnoutse, C. A. J., & Schellings, G. L. M. (2003). Learning reading strategies by triggering reading motivation. Educational Studies, 29, 387-409.
2. Alexander, P. A. (2006). Psychology in learning and instruction. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Pearson Prentice Hall.
3. Broekkamp, H., & van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. (2007). Students adaptation of study strategies when preparing for classroom tests. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 228-401.
4. Burke Johnson, R., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.
5. Cohen, L., Manion, L., Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. (6th ed.) Routledge Falmer.
6. Dinsmore, D. L., Alexander, P. A., & Loughlin, S. M. (2008). Focusing the conceptual lens on metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 391-409.
7. Greene, J. A., & Azevedo, R. (2010). The measurement of learners' self-regulated cognitive and metacognitive processes while using computer-based learning environments. Educational Psychologist, 45, 203-209.
8. Hadwin, A. L., Winne, P. H., Stockley, D. B., Nesbit, J. C., & Woszczyna, C. (2001). Context moderates students' self-reports about how they study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 477-487.
9. Karabenick, S. A., Woolley, M. E., Friedel, J. M., Ammon, B. V., Blazevski, J., Bonney, C. R., et al. (2007). Cognitive processing of self-report items in educational research: Do they think what we mean? Educational Psychologist, 42(3), 139-151.
10. Mevarech, Z., & Fridkin, S. (2006). The effects of IMPROVE on mathematical knowledge, mathematical reasoning, and metacognition. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 85-97.
11. Muis, K. R., Winne, P. H., & Jamieson-Noel, D. (2007). Using a multitrait-multimethod analysis to examine conceptual similarities of three self-regulated learning inventories. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 177-195.
12. Perry, N. E., & Winne, P. H. (2006). Learning from learning kits: gStudy traces of students' self-regulated engagements with computerized content. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 211-228.
13. Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385-408.
14. Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40.
15. Richardson, J. T. E. (2004). Methodological issues in questionnaire-based research on student learning in higher education. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 347-358.
16. Samuelstuen, M. S., & Bråten, I. (2007). Examining the validity of self-reports on scales measuring students' strategic processing. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 351-378.
17. Schellings, G. L. M., Aarnoutse, C. A. J., & van Leeuwe, J. (2006). Third-grader's think aloud protocols: Types of reading activities in reading an expository text. Learning and Instruction, 16, 549-568.
18. Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460-475.
19. van der Stel, M., & Veenman, M. J. V. (2008). Relation between intellectual ability and metacognitive skillfulness as predictors of learning performance of young students performing tasks in different domains. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 128-134.
20. van Gog, T., Paas, F., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Witte, P. (2005). Uncovering the problem- solving process: Cued retrospective reporting versus concurrent and retrospective reporting. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 11(4), 237-244.
21. van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. (2000). Assessing self-directed learning. In P. R. J. Simons, J. van der Linden, & T. Duffy (Eds.), New learning (pp. 83-101). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
22. van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. (2009). Leerstrategieën meten. Soorten meetmethoden en hun bruikbaarheid in onderwijs en onderzoek. [Measuring Learning strategies. Different kinds of assessment methods and their usefulness in education and research]. Pedagogische Studiën, 86, 103-110.
23. van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., Simons, P. R. J., & Volet, S. (2000). Active learning: Self-directed learning and independent work. In P. R. J. Simons, J. L. van der Linden, & T. M. Duffy (Eds.), New learning (pp. 21-37). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
24. Veenman, M. V. J. (2005). The assessment of metacognitive skills: What can be learned from multimethod designs? In C. Artelt & B. Moschner (Eds.), Lernstrategien und Metakognition: Implikationen für Forschung und Praxis (pp. 75-97). Berlin: Waxmann.
25. Veenman, M. V. J. (2011). Learning to self-monitor and self-regulate. In R. Mayer & P. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction (pp. 197-218). New York: Routledge.
26. Veenman, M. V. J., van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 3-15.
27. Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277-304). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
28. Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In P. R. Pintrich, M. Boekaerts, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531-567). Orlando: Academic.
29. Winne, P. H., Jamieson-Noel, D. L., & Muis, K. (2002). Methodological issues and advances in researching tactics, strategies, and self-regulated learning. In P. R. Pintrich & M. L. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: New directions in measures and methods, vol. 12 (pp. 121-155). Greenwich: JAI.