Adoption of innovative e-learning support for teaching: A multiple case study at the University of Waikato

Australasian Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 499-513

  Johnson, E Marcia ^a   Cowie, Bronwen ^a   De Lange, Willem ^a   Falloon, Garry ^a   Hight, Craig ^a   Khoo, Elaine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960005630     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14495554     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14742/ajet.957     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bakhurst, D. (2009). Reflections on activity theory. Educational Review, 61(2), 197-210.
2. Black, A. (2005). Spatial ability and earth science conceptual understanding. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(4), 402-414. http://nagt.org/files/nagt/jge/abstracts/Black_v53p402.pdf
3. Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101. https://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/11735/
4. Clark, R. E. (2009). Translating research into new instructional technologies for higher education: The active ingredient process. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 21(1), 4-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12528-009-9013-8
5. Cole, M. & Engestrom, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Saloman (Ed), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations, pp. 1-46. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
6. Convery, A. (2009). The pedagogy of the impressed: How teachers become victims of technological vision. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(1), 25-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13540600802661303
7. Crook, C. (2008). Web 2.0 technologies for learning: The current landscape - opportunities, challenges and tensions. http://www.becta.org.uk[viewed 1March2009].http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/1475/2/becta_2008_web2_currentlandscapeadditional_litrev.pdf
8. Divaharan, S. & Lim, C. P. (2010). Secondary school socio-cultural context influencing ICT integration: A case study approach. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(6), 741-763. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet26/divaharan-2.html
9. Edelson, D. C. (2001). Learning-for-use: A framework for the design of technology-supported inquiry activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 355-385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200103)38:3<355::AID-TEA1010>3.0.CO;2-M
10. Goodfellow, R. (2007). Learning technologies in the university: From 'tools for learning' to 'sites of practice'. In R. Goodfellow & M. R. Lea (Eds), Challenging e-learning in the university: A literacies perspective, pp. 29-49. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.
11. Government of New Zealand (2006). Education Counts. Education attainment of the population. [viewed 15 April 2008]. http://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/statistics/tertiary_education/retention_and_achievement
12. Helsper, E. J. & Eynon, R. (2009). Digital natives: Where is the evidence? British Educational Research Journal, 36(3), 503-520. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/27739/andhttp://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~db=all?content=10.1080/01411920902989227
13. Johnson, E. M., Cowie, B., De Lange, W. & Hight, C. (2009). Leveling the playing field: Exploiting technology to enhance tertiary learning. In Same places, different spaces. Proceedings ascilite Auckland 2009. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/auckland09/procs/johnson.pdf
14. Johnson, E. M., Haines, A. & Strang, P. (2009). Transforming our work: E-learning initiatives. In Proceedings of the 2008 annual conference of the Association of Tertiary Learning Advisors of Aotearoa New Zealand, 37-49. Porirua, New Zealand.
15. Kanuka, H. & Jugdev, K. (2006). Distance education MBA students: An investigation into the use of an orientation course to address academic and social integration issues. Open Learning, 21(2), 153-166.
16. Krause, K. L., Hartley, R., James, R. & McInnis, C. (2005). The first year experience in Australian universities: Findings from a decade of national studies. Centre for the Study of Higher Education. Melbourne, Australia: University of Melbourne. http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/higher_education/publications_resources/profiles/first_year_experience.htm
17. Kastens, K. A., Manduca, C. A., Cervato, C., Frodeman, R., Goodwin, C., Liben, L. S., Mogk, D. W., Spangler, T. C., Stillings, N. A. & Titus, S. (2009). How geoscientists think and learn. EOS Transactions, 90(31), 265-272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009EO310001
18. Lather, P. (1992). Critical frames in educational research: Feminist and post-structural perspectives. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 87-99.
19. Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
20. Maykut, P. & Morehouse, R. (1994). Beginning qualitative research: A philosophic and practical guide. London: Falmer Press.
21. McGrenere, J. & Ho, W. (2000). Affordances: Clarifying and evolving a concept. In S. Fels & P. Poulin (Eds), Proceedings of Graphic Interface 2000, pp. 179-186. Montreal: Canadian Human-Computer Communications Society. [viewed 29 Dec 2009, verified 2 Jun 2011]. http://www.cs.ubc.ca/~joanna/papers/GI2000_McGrenere_Affordances.pdf
22. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M. & Jones, K. (2010). Evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Center for Technology in Learning, U.S. Department of Education. http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf
23. Moore, M. (1997). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed), Theoretical principles of distance education, pp. 22-38. New York: Routledge.
24. Murphy, E. & Rodriguez-Manzanares, M. A. (2008). Using activity theory and its principle of contradictions to guide research in educational technology. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(4), 442-457. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet24/murphy.html
25. Patel, F. (2010). Exploring a model and approach to the scholarship of teaching: The scholarship teaching academy. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1(1). http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cjsotl_rcacea/vol1/iss1/3/ [viewed 28 July 2010].
26. Reeves, T. C., McKenney, S. & Herrington, J. (2011). Publishing and perishing: The critical importance of educational design research. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(1), 55-65. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet27/reeves.html
27. Russell, M. (2007). 'Slicing up the funding pie': Tertiary funding in New Zealand: Where it's been and where it's going. New Zealand Journal of Teacher's Work, 4(2), 111-116. http://www.teacherswork.ac.nz/journal/volume4_issue2/russell.pdf
28. Salaway, G., Caruso, J. B. & Nelson, M. R. (2007). The ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2007. Research study from the EDUCAUSE Centre for Applied Research. [viewed 22 Jul 2008, verified 2 Jun 2011]. http://www.educause.edu/ECAR/TheECARStudyofUndergraduateStu/161967
29. Selander, S. (2008). Designs of learning and the formation and transformation of knowledge in an era of globalization. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27(4), 267-281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11217-007-9068-9
30. Shulman, L. S. (1999). Visions of the possible: Models for campus support of the scholarship of teaching and learning. Comments made at meetings during November and December. [viewed 5 Aug 2010, verified 2 Jun 2011]. http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/elibrary/visions-possible-models-campus-support-scholarship-teaching-and-learning
31. Thorpe, M. (2008). Effective online interaction: Mapping course design to bridge from research to practice. Australasion Journal of Educational Technology, 24(1), 57-72. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet24/thorpe.html
32. Wesch, M. (2009). From knowledgable to knowledge-able: Learning in new media environments. [viewed 21 Jan 2009; verified 2 Jun 2011]. http://www.academiccommons.org/commons/essay/knowledgable-knowledge-able
33. Whitworth, W. (2006). Dynamic but prosaic: A methodology for studying e-learning environments. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 29(2), 151-163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17437270600891556