Spatial ability and earth science conceptual understanding

Journal of Geoscience Education

Volumn 53, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 402-414

  Black, Alice A ^a  

^a MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EARTH SCIENCE; EDUCATION;

EID: 27744450409     PISSN: 10899995     EISSN: 10899995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5408/1089-9995-53.4.402     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Anastasi, A., and Urbina, S., 1997, Psychological Testing, 7th ed., Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice Hall.
2. Baenninger, M., and Newcombe, N., 1995, Environmental input to the development of sex-related differences in spatial and mathematical ability, Learning and Individual Differences, v. 7, p. 363-379.
3. Battista, M.T., Wheatley, G.H., and Talsma, G., 1982, The importance of spatial visualization and cognitive development for geometry learning in preservice elementary teachers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, v. 13, p. 332-340.
4. Bem, L.L., 1974, The measurement of psychological androgyny, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, v. 42, p. 155-162.
5. Bennett, G.K., Seashore, H.G., and Wesman, A.G., 1991, DAT differential aptitude tests for personnel and career assessment technical manual, San Antonio, TX, The Psychological Corporation, 41 p.
6. Bezzi, A., 1991, A Macintosh program for improving three-dimensional thinking, Journal of Geological Education, v. 39, p. 284-288.
7. Black, A.A., 2005, An Instrument for Testing Earth Science Misconceptions and Conceptual Difficulties: Development, Field Testing and Results, in preparation for publication.
8. Bodner, G., and Guay, R., 1995, The Purdue Visualization of Rotations Test. Unpublished work.
9. Branoff, T., 1998, The effects of adding coordinate axes to a mental rotations task in measuring spatial visualization ability in introductory undergraduate technical graphics courses, Engineering Design Graphics Journal, v. 62, p. 16-34.
10. Brosnan, M., 1998, The implications for academic attainment of perceived gender-appropriateness upon spatial task performance, British Journal of Educational Psychology, v. 68, p. 203-215.
11. Carpenter, J.R., Tolhurst, J.W., Day, E.A., Zenger, S., Barron, A., and Dozier, K., 1999, A constructivist approach to a high-enrollment undergraduate environmental-education course, Journal of Geoscience Education, v. 47, p. 249-254.
12. Carter, C.S., LaRussa, M.A., and Bodner, G.M., 1987. A study of two measures of spatial ability as predictors of success in different levels of general chemistry, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, v. 24, p. 645-657.
13. Chang, C.-Y., Hua, H.P., and Barufaldi, J.P., 1999, Earth science student attitudes toward a constructivist teaching approach in Taiwan, Journal of Geoscience Education, v. 47, p. 331-335.
14. Chang, J., 1999, Teachers college students' conceptions about evaporation, condensation, and boiling, Science Education, v. 83, p. 511-526.
15. DeAvila, E.A., Havassy, B., and Pascual-Leone, J., 1976, Mexican-American school children: A neo-Piagetian analysis. Washington, DC, Georgetown University Press.
16. DeLaughter, J.E., Stein, S., Stein, C., and Bain, K.R., 1998, Preconceptions abound among students in an introductory earth science course, EOS: American Geophysical Union, v. 79, p. 429,432-433.
17. Dodick, J., and Orion, N., 2003a, Cognitive factors affecting student understanding of geologic time, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, v. 40, p. 415-442.
18. Dodick, J., and Orion, N., 2003b, Measuring student understanding of geological time, Science Education, v.87, p. 708-731.
19. Downs, R.M., and Liben, L.S., 1991, The development of expertise in geography: A cognitive-developmental approach to geographic education, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, v. 81, p. 304-327.
20. Dunnivant, F.M., and Newman, M.E., 1999, A comprehensive stream study designed for an undergraduate non-majors course in earth science, Journal of Geoscience Education, v. 47, p. 158-165.
21. Dyche, S., McClurg, P., Stepans, J., and Veath, M.L., 1993, Questions and conjectures concerning models, misconceptions, and spatial ability, School Science and Mathematics, v. 93, p. 191-197.
22. Ekstrom, R.B., French, J.W., Harman, H.H., and Derman, D., 1976, Kit of factor referenced cognitive tests, Princeton, NJ, Educational Testing Service, 224 p..
23. Eliot, J., 1980, Classification of figural spatial tests. Perceptual and Motor Skills, v. 51, p. 847-851.
24. Fennema, E., and Sherman, J., 1977, Sex-related differences in mathematics achievement, spatial visualization and affective factors, American Educational Research Journal, v. 14, p. 51-71.
25. Finegold, A., 1988, Cognitive gender differences are disappearing, American Psychologist, v. 43, p. 95-103.
26. Firth, R., and Brosnan, M., 2000, The implications for academic attainment of perceived gender-appropriateness upon spatial task performance: A corrigendum, British Journal of Educational Psychology, v. 70, p. 273-274.
27. Ford, D.J., 2003, Sixth graders' conceptions of rocks in their local environments, Journal of Geoscience Education, v. 51, p. 373-377.
28. Friedman, W.J., 2000, The development of children's knowledge of the times of future events, Child Development, v. 71, p. 913-932.
29. Geary, D.C., 1998, Male, female: The evolution of human sex differences, Washington, D.C., American Psychological Association, 397 p.
30. Gobert, J.D., 2000, A typology of causal models for plate tectonics: Inferential power and barriers to understanding, International Journal of Science Education, v. 22, p. 937-977.
31. Gobert, J.D., and Clement, J., 1999, The effects of student-generated diagrams on conceptual understanding of causal and dynamic knowledge in science, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, v. 36, p. 39-53.
32. Grandits, D.P., and Young, D.D., 1975, A study of college nonscience majors to ascertain positive trends in science course selection. Science Education, v. 59, p. 191-198.
33. Griffiths, A.K., and Preston, K.R., 1992, Grade-12 students' misconceptions relating to fundamental characteristics of atoms and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, v. 29, p. 611-628.
34. Guay, R.B., 1980, Spatial ability measurement: A critique and an alternative, Paper presented at the 1980 annual meeting of the American Educational Resesarch Association, April, Boston, MA, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED189166.
35. Halpern, D.F., 1992, Sex differences in cognitive abilities, 2nd ed., Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 308 p..
36. Halpern, D.F., and LaMay, M.L., 2000, The smarter sex: A critical review of sex differences in intelligence, Educational Psychology Review, v. 12, p. 229-246.
37. Hawkins, B., 2000, Young children's interpretations of aerial views as it relates to their ability to understand the Earth as spherical, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for the Education of Science Teachers, Akron, OH, 28 p.
38. Huck, S., and Cormier, W., 1996, Reading statistics and research, 2nd. ed., New York, Longman Publishing. Hult, R.E., and B.Wial visualization: Athletic skills and sex differences. Perceptual and Motor Skills, v. 63, p. 163-168.
39. Inhelder, B., and Piaget, J., 1958, The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence, New York, Basic.
40. Kali, Y., and Orion, N., 1996, Spatial abilities of high-school students in the perception of geologic structures, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, v. 33, p. 369-391.
41. Kikas, E., 1998, Pupils' explanations of seasonal changes: Age differences and the influence of teaching, British Journal of Educational Psychology, v. 68, p. 505-516.
42. Kimura, D., 1999, Sex and Cognition, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 213 p.
43. Kusnick, J., 2002, Growing pebbles and conceptual prisms - understanding the source of student misconceptions about rock formation, Journal of Geoscience Education, v. 50, p. 31-39.
44. Kwon, Y., and Lawson, A.E., 2000, Linking brain growth with the development of scientific reasoning ability and conceptual change during adolescence, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, v. 37, p. 44-62.
45. Kyllonen, P.S., Lohman, D.F., and Snow, R.E., 1984, Effects of aptitudes, strategy training, and task facets on spatial task performance, Journal of Educational Psychology, v. 76, p. 130-143.
46. Linn, M., and Petersen, A.C., 1985, Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis, Child Development, v. 56, p. 1479-1498.
47. Lord, T.R.., 1985. Enhancing the visuo-spatial aptitude of students, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, v. 227, p. 395-405.
48. Lord, T.R., 1987, A look at spatial abilities in undergraduate women science majors, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, v. 24, p. 757-767.
49. Lord, T.R., and Rupert, J.L., 1995, Visual-spatial aptitude in elementary education majors in science and math tracks, Journal of Elementary Science Education, v. 7, p. 47-58.
50. Maloney, D.P., 1981, Comparative reasoning abilities of college students, American Journal of Physics, v. 49, p. 7894-786.
51. Mathewson, J.H., 1999, Visual-spatial thinking: An aspect of science overlooked by educators, Science Education, v. 83, p. 33-54.
52. McCormack, A.J., and Mason, C.L., 2001, Visual/spatial thinking: A forgotten fundamental for school science programs. Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers of Science, Akron, OH. 16 p.
53. McGee, M.G., 1979, Human spatial abilities: Psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neurological influences, Psychological Bulletin, v. 86, p. 889-918.
54. Meyer, W.B., 1987, Vernacular American theories of earth science, Journal of Geological Education, v. 35, p. 193-196.
55. Nordvik, H., and Amponsah, B., 1998, Gender differences in spatial abilities and spatial activity among university students in an egalitarian educational system, Sex Roles, v. 38, p. 1009-1023.
56. Philips, W.C., 1991, Earth science misconceptions, The Science Teacher, v. 58,p. 21-23.
57. Piburn, M.D., Reynolds, S.J., Leedy, D.E., McAuliffe, C.M., Birk, J.P., and Johnson, J.K., 2002, The hidden earth: Visualization of geologic features and the subsurface geometry, proceedings of the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA, 46 p.
58. Pribyl, J.R., and Bodner, G.M., 1987, Spatial ability and its role in organic chemistry: A study of four organic courses, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, v. 24, p. 229-240.
59. Provo-Klimek, J.A., and Cash, W.C., 2001, Relationship of spatial ability and gender to performance in veterinary gross anatomy, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, St. Louis, MO.
60. Repine, T., and Rockey, D., 1997, Constructive contours: Build a life-size topographic map on school grounds, The Science Teacher, v. 64, p. 26-29.
61. Riggs, E.M., and Kimbrough, D.L., 2002, Implementation of a constructivist pedagogy in a geoscience course desinged for pre-service K-6 teachers: Progress, pitfalls, and lessons learned, Journal of Geoscience Education, v. 50, 49-55.
62. Ryan, J., 1989, Study skills for the sciences: A bridge over troubled waters, Journal of College Science Teaching, v. 18, p. 373-377.
63. Schneps, M., and Sadler, P., 1989, A private universe (video), Pyramid Films, Santa Monica, CA.
64. Schofield, N.J., and Kirby, J.R., 1994, Position location on topographical maps: Effects of task factors, training, and strategies, Cognition and Instruction, v. 12, p. 35-60.
65. Schoon, K.J., 1992, Students' alternative conceptions of earth and space, Journal of Geological Education, v. 40, p. 209-214.
66. Schoon, K.J., 1995, The origin and extent of alternative conceptions in the earth and space sciences: A survey of pre-service elementary teachers, Journal of Elementary Science Education, v. 7, p. 27-46.
67. Signorella, M.L., and Jamison, W., 1978, Sex differences in the correlations among field dependence, spatial ability, sex role orientation, and performance of Piaget's water-level task, Developmental Psychology, v. 14, p. 689-690.
68. Slater, T.F., Safko, J.L., and Carpenter, J.R., Long-term attitude sustainability from a constructivist-based astronomy-for-teachers course, Journal of Geoscience Education, v. 47, p. 36-374.
69. Sorby, S.A., 1999, Developing 3-D spatial visualization skills, Engineering Design Graphics Journal, vol. 63, p. 21-32.
70. Sorby, S.A., and Baartmans, B.J., 1996, A course for the development of 3-D spatial visualization skills, Engineering design Graphics Journal, vol. 60, p. 13-20.
71. Trend, R., 2000, Conceptions of geological time among primary teacher trainees, with reference to their engagement with geoscience, history, and science, International Journal of Science Education, v. 22, p. 539-555.
72. Trend, R.D., 2001, Deep time framework: A preliminary study of U.K. primary teachers' conceptions of geological time and perceptions of geoscience, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, v. 38, p. 191-221.
73. Tretter, T.R., and Jones, M.G., 2003, A sense of scale: Studying how scale affects systems and organisms, The Science Teacher, v. 32, p. 22-25.
74. Vandenberg, S.G., and Kuse, A.R., 1978, Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, v. 47, p. 599-604.
75. Vasta, R., Knott, J.A., and Gaze, C.E., 1996, Can spatial training erase the gender differences on the water-level task? Psychology of Women Quarterly, v. 20, p. 549-567.
76. Wampler, J.M., 1999, Misconceptions - A column about errors in geoscience textbooks: How two rights can make a wrong, Journal of Geoscience Education, v. 47, p. 182-184.
77. Wampler, J.M., 2001, Misconceptions - A column about errors in geoscience textbooks: Unnatural restrictions on the evaporation of water, Journal of Geoscience Education, v. 49, p. 397-399.
78. Witkin, H.A., Oltman, P.K., Raskin, E., Karp, S.A., 1971, A manual for the embedded figures test, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA,
79. Witkin, H.A., 1948, The effect of training and of structural aids on performance in three tests of space orientation. Report No. 80, Division of Research, Civil Aeronautics Administration, Washing, DC.
80. Witkin, H.A., Oltman, P.K., Raskin, E., Karp, S.A., 2002, Group embedded figures test manual, Mind Garden, Inc., Redwood City, CA, 35 p.
81. Zavotka, S., 1987, Three-dimensional computer animated graphics: A tool for spatial instruction Educational Communications and Technology Journal, v. 35, p. 133-144.