The pedagogy of the impressed: How teachers become victims of technological vision

Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 25-41

  Convery, Andy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUNDERLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Methodology; Rhetoric; Teachers; Technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 62649140622     PISSN: 13540602     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13540600802661303     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Becta. (2004). What the research says about portable ICT devices in teaching and learning. Coventry: Becta.
2. Biott, C., & Easen, P. (1994). Collaborative learning in classrooms and staffrooms. London: David Fulton.
3. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4. DETYA. (2001). Information and communication technology for teaching and learning. Retrieved January 10, 2009, from http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/ school-education/publications-resources/ documents/technology-pdf.htm
5. DfES. (2003). Fulfilling the potential: Transforming teaching and learning through ICT in schools. London: DfES.
6. DfES. (2005). Harnessing technology: Transforming learning and children's services. London: DfES.
7. Hennessy, S., Deaney, R., & Ruthven, K. (2005). Emerging teacher strategies for mediating technology-integrated instructional conversations: A sociocultural perspective. Curriculum Journal, 16(3), 265-292.
8. Higgins, S. (2003). Does ICT improve learning and teaching in schools? A professional user review of UK research undertaken for the British Educational Research Association. Nottingham: BERA.
9. Nichol, J., & Watson, K. (2003). Editorial: Rhetoric and reality - the present and future of ICT in education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(2), 131-136.
10. Perry, D. (2003). The use of handheld computers (PDA's) in schools. Coventry: DfES/Becta.
11. Reynolds, D., Treharne, D., & Tripp, H. (2003). ICT - the hopes and the reality. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(2), 151-167.
12. Savill-Smith, C. (2005). The use of palmtop computers for learning: A review of the literature. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 567-568.
13. Savill-Smith, C., & Kent, P. (2003). The use of palmtop computers for learning: A review of the literature. London: LSDA.
14. Selwyn, N. (2002). Learning to love the micro: The discursive construction of 'educational' computing in the UK, 1979-1989. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(3), 427-443.
15. Selwyn, N. (2006). High-tech soc-of-ed? Signs of a 'smart' sociology of education technology. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27(3), 417-426.
16. Sharples, M. (2000). The design of personal mobile technologies for lifelong learning. Computers and Education, 34, 177-193.
17. Smith, H., Higgins, S., Wall, K., & Miller, J. (2005). Interactive whiteboards: Boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 91-101.
18. Somekh, B. (1994). The contribution of action research to development in social endeavours: A position paper on action research methodology. Paper given to Practitioner Research Workshop at British Educational Research Association Conference, Oxford.
19. Somekh, B. (2001). The role of evaluation in ensuring excellence in communication technology initiatives. Education, Communication and Information, 1(1), 75-101.
20. Somekh, B. (2004). Taking the sociological imagination to school: An analysis of the (lack of) impact of information and communication technologies on education systems. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13(2), 163-179.
21. Somekh, B. (2006). Action research: A methodology for change and development. Berks: Oxford University Press.
22. Somekh, B. (2007). Pedagogy and learning with ICT: Researching the art of innovation. London: Routledge.
23. US Department of Education (2004). National Education Technology Plan 2004: Toward a new golden age in American education. Retrieved January 10, 2009, from www.ed.gov/technology/plan
24. Woolgar, S. (2002). Virtual society? Technology, cyberbole, reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.