Translating research into new instructional technologies for higher education: The active ingredient process

Journal of Computing in Higher Education

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 4-18

  Clark, Richard E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

External validity; Instructional technology development; Intervention design; Research and development cycle; Research design

Indexed keywords

EID: 78449312594     PISSN: 10421726     EISSN: 18671233     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12528-009-9013-8     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
2. Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-152.
3. Clark, R. E. (1982). Antagonism between achievement and enjoyment in ATI studies. Educational Psychologist, 17(2), 92-101.
4. Clark, R. E. (1989). Questions and designs for research in instructional technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 1(1), 27-36.
5. Clark, R. E. (2001). Learning from media: Arguments, analysis and evidence. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishers. ISBN 1-930608-77-2.
6. Clark, R. E. (2005). Motivating individuals, teams and organizations. In J. Pershing (Ed.), Handbook of human performance improvement (Third ed., pp. 268-286). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Pfeiffer.
7. Clark, R. E. (2009a). Resistance to change: Unconscious knowledge and the challenge of unlearning. In D. C. Berliner & H. Kupermintz (Eds.), Changing institutions, environments and people (pp. 75-94). New York: Routledge.
8. Clark, R. E. (2009b). How much and what type of guidance is optimal for learning from instruction? In S. Tobias & T. M. Duffy (Eds.), Constructivist theory applied to instruction: Success or failure? (pp. 158-183). New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.
9. Clark, R. E., & Elen, J. (2006). When less is more: Research and theory insights about instruction for complex learning. In J. Elen & R. Clark (Eds.), Handling complexity in learning environments: Research and theory (pp. 283-297). Oxford: Elsevier Science Limited.
10. Clark, R. E., & Estes, F. (1998). Technology or craft: What are we doing? Educational Technology, 38(5), 5-11.
11. Clark, R. E., & Estes, F. (1999). The development of authentic educational technologies. Educational Technology, 37(2), 5-16.
12. Clark, R. E., & Estes, F. (2008). Turning research into results: A guide to selecting the right performance Solutions (2nd ed.). Greenwich Conn: Information Age Publishers.
13. Clark, R. E., Yates, K., Early, S., & Moulton, K. (in press). An analysis of the failure of electronic media and discovery-based learning: Evidence for the performance benefits of guided training methods. In K. H. Silber & R. Foshay (Eds.), Handbook of training and improving workplace performance, volume I: Instructional design and training deliver. International Society for Performance Improvement.
14. Colquitte, J. A., LePine, A. A., & Noe, R. A. (2000). Toward an integrative theory of training motivation: A meta-analytic path analysis of the past 20 years of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 678-707.
15. Cook, T. D., Appleton, H., Conner, R. F., Shaffer, A., Tamkin, G., & Weber, S. J. (1975). "Sesame Street" revisited. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
16. Cronbach, L. J., & Snow, R. E. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions. New York: Irvington Publishers.
17. Druckman, D., Singer, J. E., & van Cott, H. (Eds.). (1997). Enhancing organizational performance. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
18. Gage, N. (1985). Hard gains in the soft sciences: The case of pedagogy. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa, Center on Evaluation, Development and Research.
19. Handelsman, J., Egert-May, D., Beichner, R., Bruns, P., Change, A., DeHaan, R., et al. (2004). Scientific teaching. Science, 304, 521-522.
20. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Hofstede, G., & McCrae, R. R. (2004). Personality and culture revisited: Linking traits and dimensions of culture. Cross-Cultural Research, 38(1), 52-88.
22. Kirschner, P., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimally guided learning does not work: An analysis of the failure of discovery learning, problem-based learning, experiential learning and inquiry-based learning. Educational Psychologist, 41(1), 75-86.
23. Landa, L. N. (1983). The algo-heuristic theory of instruction. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models (pp. 163-211). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.
24. Mayer, R. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist, 59(1), 14-19.
25. Mayer, R. (Ed.). (2005). Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Merrill, M. D. (1983). Component display theory. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models (pp. 279-333). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43-59.
28. Merrill, M. D. (2006). Hypothesized performance on complex tasks as a function of scaled instructional strategies. In J. Elen & R. Clark (Eds.), Handling complexity in learning environments: Research and theory (pp. 265-282). Oxford: Elsevier Science Limited.
29. Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research and applications (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
30. Prochaska, J. M., Norcross, J., & DiClemente, C. (1994). Changing for good. New York: Avon Press.
31. Prochaska, J. M., Prochaska, J. O., & Levesque, D. A. (2001). A transtheoretical approach to changing organizations. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 28(4), 247-261.
32. Ravitch, D., & Viteritti, J. P. (2001). Making good citizens: Education and Civil Society. New Haven: Yale University Press.
33. Reigeluth, C. M. (1983). Instructional design, what is it and why is it? In C. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models (pp. 4-31). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.
34. Rossett, A. (1999). First things fast: A handbook for performance analysis. SF: Jossey Bass.
35. Rossett, A., & Czech, C. (1996). They really wanna but...The aftermath of professional preparation in performance technology. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 8(4), 114-132.
36. Sitzman, T., Kraiger, K., Stewart, D., & Wisher, R. (2006). The comparative effectictiveness of web-based and classroom instruction: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 59, 623-664.
37. Sweller, J. (2006). How the human cognitive system deals with complexity. In J. Elen & R. E. Clark (Eds.), Handling complexity in learning environments: Research and theory (pp. 13-26). Oxford, GB: Elsevier Science Limited.
38. Sweller, J., Kirschner, P. A., & Clark, R. E. (2007). Why minimally guided teaching techniques do not work: A reply to commentaries. Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 115-121.
39. Winthrop, H. (1963). Some considerations concerning the status of phenomenology. Journal of General Psychology, 68, 127-140.