Publishing and perishing: The critical importance of educational design research

Australasian Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 55-65

  Reeves, Thomas C ^a   McKenney, Susan ^b   Herrington, Jan ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^c MURDOCH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79953846606     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14495554     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14742/ajet.982     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Atkinson, R. (2010). Editorial 26(3). AJET 26(3) published: Matters arising. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(3), iii-viii. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet26/editorial26-3.html.
2. Ball, D. L. & Forzani, F. M. (2007). What makes education research "educational"? Educational Researcher, 36(9), 529-540.
3. Barab, S. A., Thomas, M., Dodge, T., Carteaux, R. & Tuzun, H. (2005). Making learning fun: Quest Atlantis, a game without guns. Educational Technology Research & Development, 53(1), 86-108.
4. Bok, D. (2006). Our underachieving colleges: A candid look at how much students learn and why they should be learning more. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5. Bransford, J. D., Stipek, D. J., Vye, N. J., Gomez, L. M. & Lam, D. (Eds.) (2009). The role of research in educational improvement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
6. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141-178.
7. Clark, R. E. (1998). Bloodletting, media and learning. In T. L. Russell (Ed.). The no significant difference phenomenon (pp. i-iv). Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University Press.
8. Coady, T. (Ed.) (2000). Why universities matter: A conversation about values, means and directions. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
9. Collins, A. (1992). Towards a design science of education. In E. Scanlon & T. O'Shea (Eds.), New directions in educational technology (pp. 15-22). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
10. Creswell, J. W. & Plano-Clark, V. L. (2006). Designing and conducting mixed methods of research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
11. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.
13. Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The flat world and education: How America's commitment to equity will determine our future. New York: Teachers College Press.
14. De Vaney, A. (1998). Can and need educational technology become a postmodern enterprise? Theory into Practice, 37(1), 72-80.
15. Gagné, R. M. (1997). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
16. Gladwell, M. (2010). The treatment: Why is it so difficult to develop drugs for cancer? The New Yorker, 86(17 May), 68-77.
17. Goodyear, R. K., Brewer, D. J., Symms-Gallagher, K., Tracey, T. J. G., Claiborn, C. D., Lichtenberg, J. W. & Bruce E. Wampold, B. E. (2009). The intellectual foundations of education: Core journals and their impact on scholarship and practice. Educational Researcher, 38, 700-706.
18. Hacker, A. & Dreifus, C. (2010). Higher education: How colleges are wasting our money and failing our kids-and what we can do about it. New York: Times Books.
19. Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses related to achievement. New York: Routledge.
20. Herrington, J., McKenney, S., Reeves, T. C. & Oliver, R. (2007). Design-based research and doctoral students: Guidelines for preparing a dissertation proposal. In C. Montgomerie & J. Seale (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia 2007: World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 4089-4097). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
21. Horton, R. (2000). Genetically modified food: Consternation, confusion, and crack-up. Medical Journal of Australia, 172, 148-149.
22. Hussey, T. & Smith, P. (2009). The trouble with higher education: A critical examination of our universities. London: Routledge.
23. Ioannidis J. P. A. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. Public Library of Science, Medicine, 2(8), e124. http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124.
24. Kelly, A. E. (2003). Research as design. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 3-4.
25. Kelly, A., Lesh R. & Baek, J. (Eds.) (2008). Handbook of design research methods in education. New York: Routledge.
26. Krathwohl, D. R. (2009). Methods of educational and social science research: The logic of methods (3rd ed.). Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
27. Laurel, B. (2004). Design research: Methods and perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
29. Neuman, D. (1991). Learning disabled students' interactions with commercial courseware: A naturalistic study. Educational Technology Research & Development, 39(1), 31-49.
30. Newman, D. (1990). Opportunities for research on the organizational impact of school computers. Educational Researcher, 19(3), 8-13.
31. Pardee, A. B. & Stein, G. S. (2009). The biology and treatment of cancer: Understanding cancer. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
32. Ravitch, D. (2010). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York: Basic Books.
33. Reeves, T. C. (2000). Socially responsible educational technology research. Educational Technology, 40(6), 19-28.
34. Reeves, T. C. & Laffey, J. M. (1999). Design, assessment, and evaluation of a problem-based learning environment in undergraduate engineering. Higher Education Research and Development, 18(2), 219-232.
35. Smil, V. (2010). Energy myths and realities: Bringing science to the energy policy debate. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
36. Tarabini, A. (2010). Education and poverty in the global development agenda: Emergence, evolution and consolidation. International Journal of Educational Development, 30(2), 204-212.
37. Taylor, M. (2010). Crisis on campus: A bold plan for reforming our colleges and universities. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
38. Togia, A. & Tsigilis, N. (2006). Impact factor and education journals: A critical examination and analysis. International Journal of Educational Research, 45(6), 362-379.
39. UN Millennium Project (2005). Investing in development: A practical plan to achieve the Millennium Development Goals. New York: United National Development Program.
40. van Aalst, J. (2010). Using Google Scholar to estimate the impact of journal articles in education. Educational Researcher, 39, 387-400.
41. van den Akker, J. (1999). Principles and methods of development research. In J. van den Akker, N. Nieveen, R. M. Branch, K. L. Gustafson & T. Plomp (Eds.), Design methodology and developmental research in education and training (pp. 1-14). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
42. van den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S. & Nieveen, N. (2006). Educational design research. London: Routledge.
43. Whitehurst, G. J. (2010). Spurring innovation through education: Four ideas. Brookings Institute Policy Brief No. 174. [verified 18 Jan 2010] http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/rc/papers/2010/0603_innovation_whitehurst/pb_174.pdf.