Using 2-DE for the differentiation of local chicken breeds

Proteomics

Volumn 11, Issue 13, 2011, Pages 2613-2619

  Zanetti, Enrico ^a   Molette, Caroline ^b,c,d   Chambon, Christophe ^c   Pinguet, Jeremy ^c   Rémignon, Hervé ^b,c,d   Cassandro, Martino ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

^c CEMAGREF   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

Author keywords

2 DE; Animal proteomics; Chicken; Differentiation; Local breeds; Population proteomics

Indexed keywords

MUSCLE PROTEIN;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BREED; CHICKEN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; ITALY; MALE; MASS SPECTROMETRY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEOMICS; SARCOPLASM;

ANIMALS; BREEDING; CHICKENS; ELECTROPHORESIS, GEL, TWO-DIMENSIONAL; GENETIC VARIATION; HUMANS; MALE; PHYLOGENY; PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS; SPECTROMETRY, MASS, MATRIX-ASSISTED LASER DESORPTION-IONIZATION;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 79959765265     PISSN: 16159853     EISSN: 16159861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201000639     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Biron, D. G., Loxdale, H. D., Ponton, F., Moura, H. et al., Population proteomics: an emerging discipline to study metapopulation ecology. Proteomics 2006, 6, 1712-1715.
2. Okabayashi, H., Kamiya, S., Tanabe, Y., Phylogenetic relationships among Japanese native chicken breeds based on blood protein polymorphisms. J. Poult. Sci. 1998, 35, 173-181.
3. Inafuku, K., Maeda, Y., Okamoto, S., Ardiningsasi, S. M., Hashiguchi, T., Polymorphisms of egg white proteins in native chickens in Indonesia. J. Poult. Sci. 1998, 35, 278-284.
4. Gygi, S. P., Rist, B., Gerber, S. A., Turecek, F. et al., Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags. Nat. Biotechnol. 1999, 17, 994-999.
5. Ross, P. L., Huang, Y. N., Marchese, J. N., Williamson, B. et al., Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2004, 3, 1154-1169.
6. Burgess, S. C., Proteomics in the chicken: tools for understanding immune responses to avian diseases. Poult. Sci. 2004, 83, 552-573.
7. Doherty, M. K., McLean, L., Beynon, R. J., Avian proteomics: advances, challenges and new technologies. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2007, 117, 358-369.
8. Karr, T. L., Application of proteomics to ecology and population biology. Heredity 2008, 100, 200-206.
9. Navas, A., Albar, J. P., Application of proteomics in phylogenetic and evolutionary studies. Proteomics 2004, 4, 299-302.
10. Kwasiborski, A., Sayd, T., Chambon, C., Santé-Lhoutellier, V. et al., Pig Longissimus lumborum proteome: part I. Effects of genetic background, rearing environment and gender. Meat Sci. 2008, 80, 968-981.
11. Remignon, H., Molette, C., Babile, R., Fernandez, X., Current advances in proteomic analysis and its use for the resolution of poultry meat quality problem. World Poult. Sci. J. 2006, 62, 123-129.
12. Teltathum, T., Mekchay, S., Proteome changes in Thai indigenous chicken muscle during growth period. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2009, 5, 679-685.
13. Mekchay, S., Teltathum, T., Nakasathien, S., Pongpaichan, P., Proteomic analysis of tenderness trait in Thai native and commercial broiler chicken muscles. J. Poult. Sci. 2010, 47, 8-12.
14. Zanetti, E., Dalvit, C., Molette, C., Remignon, H. et al., A proteomic approach to study local chicken breeds characterization. It. J. Anim. Sci. 2009, 8, 174-176.
15. De Marchi, M., Cassandro, M., Targhetta, C., Baruchello, M. et al., Conservation of poultry genetic resource in the Veneto region of Italy. Anim. Genet. Res. Inf. 2005, 37, 63-74.
16. Rathgeber, B. M., Boles, J. A, Shand, P. J., Rapid post mortem pH decline and delayed chilling reduce quality of Turkey breast meat. Poult. Sci. 1999, 78, 477-484.
17. Shevchenko, A., Wilm, M., Vorm, O., Mann, M., Mass spectrometric sequencing of proteins silver-stained polyacrylamide gels. Anal. Chem. 1996, 68, 850-858.
18. ® User's Guide: Statistics, Version 6.12, SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC 1997.
19. Felsenstein, J., PHYLIP v.3.6., Department of Genome Sciences, Washington University, Seattle 2005.
20. Tamura, K., Dudley, J., Nei, M., Kumar, S., MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2007, 24, 1596-1599.
21. Meunier, B., Bouley, J., Piec, I., Bernard, C. et al., Data analysis methods for detection of differential protein expression in two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Anal. Biochem. 2005, 340, 226-230.
22. Laville, E., Sayd, T., Morzel, M., Blinet, S. et al., Proteome changes during meat aging in tough and tender beef suggest the importance of apoptosis and protein solubility for beef aging and tenderization. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 10755-10764.
23. Perkins, D. N., Pappin, D. J. C., Creasy, D. M., Cottrell, J. S., Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Elecrophoresis 1999, 20, 3551-3567.
24. Zanetti, E., De Marchi, M., Dalvit, C., Cassandro, M., Genetic characterization of Italian local chicken breeds undergoing in situ conservation. Poult. Sci. 2010, 89, 420-427.
25. Doherty, M. K., McLean, L., Hayter, J. R., Pratt, J. M. et al., The proteome of chicken skeletal muscle: changes in soluble protein expression during growth in a layer strain. Proteomics 2004, 4, 2082-2093.